-Removed by request-

In case no one knew, Jim Webb was crazy, which was why he didn't make it in the race.

I find it sort of amusing that he endorsed trump, saying they're both fools.

He wasn't going to influence the election anyway, so his endorsement is pointless.

Barathemos :
Still, I look forward to seeing Trump winning the race. This should be a welcomed change of pace for America and Europe.

That's kind of like endorsing poop over pee.

blohis : You do not live in America and actually know what Donald Trump does do you?
 
 To be honest all of them are crap. Yet Trump is the worst yet I can understand how he picked Trump. 

This is hilarious to me, because I don't know too many Democrats that were in huge support of Webb EVER. The only reason why Obama almost chose him as a VP was because of his MODERATE views and his military experience. But I would stop WAY SHORT of saying that he was a champion for anyone with Liberal views.

No one cares about Jim Webb, which is why he thought twice about running for president. This was just some sort of publicity grab

It's also VERY short-sighted to say that Trump has ANY liberal views. Considering most of his platform is based of Racism and hate mongering/fear. No true democrat/liberal would support Trump in ANY WAY, shape or form.

-Removed by request-

Rasenganfan2 : I totally disagree with just about everything you said. Especially since most of it is not based on any sort of facts. But you can feel free to live your life that way, and I will continue to live my life based on facts.

-Removed by request-

I may not be much into politics, but why would he endorse any of them? They both kinda suck in terms of what they bring to the table, so why?

Rasenganfan2 : Hmm. Well, actually I'm an Admin. And yes, I do read and watch stuff outside of Fox News. I'm wondering if you do the same based on the links your shared, I'm figuring facts don't play much into your thought process.

I would stop short of sitting here and flaming me, as I have given you the same respect to agree to disagree. I can assure you that you don't want to have an actual debate with me regarding this subject because I'm confident you will lose. So If I was you, I would slink back into whatever corner you came from.

I cannot stand that stupid woman. If it comes down to Trump vs. Clinton, which it most likely will. Trump is pretty much the only option. Unless the LP can get a candidate on the debate stage.

-Removed by request-

Rasenganfan2 : Look. I've yet to flame you in any way or say anything negative about you as a person. Just that what you present as "facts" are far from it. I've certainly not stooped to the level you have when you started getting all bent out of shape and started attacking me personally because I disagreed with you.

I would encourage you to re-read what you wrote to me before in your previous post, and I'm sure any of the other Admins/globals probably would have either closed this thread or worse. The fact that I let it roll off my back and let the thread continues says a lot about the fact that I let it go, despite the fact that you turned it into some personal attack on me because you listen to some "less than trustworthy Internet sites" as somehow a source of news. It's also apperent that you are in no way an "independent" thinker, when rather than posting historical facts, you post some blog posts from people no one has ever heard of.

It's apparent that you are threatened by the fact that I disagree with you and that's ok, but I would stop short of saying I have the rational thinking of a 3rd grader. You don't know me. Because if you did, you would have already realized that I have 2 graduate degrees and a successful professional career in the IT field as well as numerous other personal accomplishments.

It's ok to disagree, and as I said before earlier in this thread. You feel free to live in your version of reality, and I will live in mine and leave it at that.