Remove Ad, Sign Up
Register to Remove Ad
Register to Remove Ad
Remove Ad, Sign Up
Register to Remove Ad
Register to Remove Ad
Register
Signup for Free!
-More Features-
-Far Less Ads-
☷ Vizzed.com Play Retro Games Vizzed Board Video Games Game Music Market Minecraft Radio Widgets Virtual Bible
☷ Register   Login  
New Posts All Threads Contribution Points Your Threads News and Updates Active Users User Ranks
About   Users   Help
Users & Guests Online
On Page: 1
Directory: 1 & 112
Entire Site: 6 & 860
Page Staff: pennylessz, pokemon x, Barathemos, tgags123, alexanyways, RavusRat,
04-19-24 05:21 AM

Forum Links

Related Threads
Coming Soon

Thread Information

Views
915
Replies
7
Rating
1
Status
CLOSED
Thread
Creator
Buga-the-Knut
04-10-15 12:02 PM
Last
Post
gamerforlifefor..
04-11-15 08:42 PM
Additional Thread Details
Views: 433
Today: 0
Users: 0 unique

Thread Actions

Thread Closed
New Thread
New Poll
Order
 

world peace or world hunger

 
world peace
 
100.0%, 3 votes
world hunger
 
0.0%, 0 vote
Multi-voting is disabled

04-10-15 12:02 PM
Buga-the-Knut is Offline
Link
| ID: 1156515 | 18 Words

Buga-the-Knut
Level: 22

POSTS: 55/92
POST EXP: 3655
LVL EXP: 51256
CP: 285.8
VIZ: 974

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
if you had a choice between creating world peace or solving world hunger which would you choose? why
if you had a choice between creating world peace or solving world hunger which would you choose? why
Perma Banned

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 01-23-15
Location: pennsylvania
Last Post: 3237 days
Last Active: 3237 days

04-10-15 12:15 PM
zanderlex is Offline
Link
| ID: 1156518 | 93 Words

zanderlex
dark mode
Level: 263


POSTS: 12926/28312
POST EXP: 1930095
LVL EXP: 295910394
CP: 156516.0
VIZ: 12362157

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
If it's based on how it is now, I would have to go with world peace because if some war breaks out, everything could end, however, if as in world hunger, you mean the possibilty of everyone in the world losing food, then I would go with that.

Basically the way it is now, I'd go with world peace because more people are at risk, however at worst case scenario, I'd go with hunger because if it gets to it, every person in the world not having food would be worse than war.
If it's based on how it is now, I would have to go with world peace because if some war breaks out, everything could end, however, if as in world hunger, you mean the possibilty of everyone in the world losing food, then I would go with that.

Basically the way it is now, I'd go with world peace because more people are at risk, however at worst case scenario, I'd go with hunger because if it gets to it, every person in the world not having food would be worse than war.
Vizzed Elite
Sergei's Mustache


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 09-25-13
Location: Inaba
Last Post: 94 days
Last Active: 6 days

04-10-15 07:46 PM
janus is Offline
Link
| ID: 1156705 | 40 Words

janus
SecureYourCodeDavid
Level: 124

POSTS: 841/4808
POST EXP: 565097
LVL EXP: 21459886
CP: 62652.6
VIZ: 462208

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
I would go for peace without hesitation. This calamity is the epitome of government intervention gone bad and it's actually one of the triggers of hunger and starvation. When at peace nations will then able to better-address problems like hunger.
I would go for peace without hesitation. This calamity is the epitome of government intervention gone bad and it's actually one of the triggers of hunger and starvation. When at peace nations will then able to better-address problems like hunger.
Site Staff
YouTube Video Editor
the unknown


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 12-14-12
Location: Murica
Last Post: 64 days
Last Active: 23 hours

04-11-15 01:27 PM
greenluigi is Offline
Link
| ID: 1156887 | 33 Words

greenluigi
Level: 100


POSTS: 1916/2965
POST EXP: 265759
LVL EXP: 10138755
CP: 9649.8
VIZ: 144174

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
Buga-the-Knut : World Peace, hands down. If we had World Peace, then every country would care about each other, and we can easily deal with problems such as hunger. You know what I mean?
Buga-the-Knut : World Peace, hands down. If we had World Peace, then every country would care about each other, and we can easily deal with problems such as hunger. You know what I mean?
Trusted Member
Mitsuhirato


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 07-02-13
Location: non
Last Post: 458 days
Last Active: 38 days

04-11-15 02:06 PM
Buga-the-Knut is Offline
Link
| ID: 1156906 | 69 Words

Buga-the-Knut
Level: 22

POSTS: 57/92
POST EXP: 3655
LVL EXP: 51256
CP: 285.8
VIZ: 974

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
greenluigi : you make a good point but the way i see it is: if world peace is created that means the population will increase which means way more mouths to feed. as well as many of the other issues that would be created from a growing population. dont get me wrong world peace would be amazing but im just looking at it from another side. if that makes sense?
greenluigi : you make a good point but the way i see it is: if world peace is created that means the population will increase which means way more mouths to feed. as well as many of the other issues that would be created from a growing population. dont get me wrong world peace would be amazing but im just looking at it from another side. if that makes sense?
Perma Banned

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 01-23-15
Location: pennsylvania
Last Post: 3237 days
Last Active: 3237 days

04-11-15 02:10 PM
greenluigi is Offline
Link
| ID: 1156909 | 59 Words

greenluigi
Level: 100


POSTS: 1929/2965
POST EXP: 265759
LVL EXP: 10138755
CP: 9649.8
VIZ: 144174

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
Buga-the-Knut : Well, um... you also have a point. Well, if we had World Peace, then that means war would stop PERMANENTLY. And, since countries become much more caring, that means the poor people will be helped, have houses, and let their children go to schools. Yes, there will be more mouths to feed, which could be easily to resolve.
Buga-the-Knut : Well, um... you also have a point. Well, if we had World Peace, then that means war would stop PERMANENTLY. And, since countries become much more caring, that means the poor people will be helped, have houses, and let their children go to schools. Yes, there will be more mouths to feed, which could be easily to resolve.
Trusted Member
Mitsuhirato


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 07-02-13
Location: non
Last Post: 458 days
Last Active: 38 days

04-11-15 02:39 PM
Patrick Star is Offline
Link
| ID: 1156926 | 80 Words

Patrick Star
awesomeguy279
Level: 82


POSTS: 1510/1910
POST EXP: 84574
LVL EXP: 5169035
CP: 8533.9
VIZ: 200280

Likes: 1  Dislikes: 0
I think this is really an impossible question to answer and they both equally lead to us all dying. Since if we do world peace we get too many people in the world and would all die from hunger most likely or if we chose world hunger then there would be crime and chaos everywhere like there is today. So really there is no good choice to this. Either way we would all most likely die one way or another.
I think this is really an impossible question to answer and they both equally lead to us all dying. Since if we do world peace we get too many people in the world and would all die from hunger most likely or if we chose world hunger then there would be crime and chaos everywhere like there is today. So really there is no good choice to this. Either way we would all most likely die one way or another.
Vizzed Elite

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 10-19-13
Location: on a chair
Last Post: 777 days
Last Active: 109 days

Post Rating: 1   Liked By: Buga-the-Knut,

04-11-15 08:42 PM
gamerforlifeforever is Offline
Link
| ID: 1157035 | 64 Words


gamerforlifeforever2
Level: 172


POSTS: 1048/10186
POST EXP: 560803
LVL EXP: 67462357
CP: 98006.2
VIZ: 3384714

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
Both scenerios would save many lives and create a better world for everyone. However, if I had to pick one it would have to be world peace because war causes people to lose their homes, get murdered, kidnapped, etc. If we could end all wars and have peace with one another, I'm sure we'd be able to solve the world hunger problem much easier.
Both scenerios would save many lives and create a better world for everyone. However, if I had to pick one it would have to be world peace because war causes people to lose their homes, get murdered, kidnapped, etc. If we could end all wars and have peace with one another, I'm sure we'd be able to solve the world hunger problem much easier.
Vizzed Elite
Ultimate Pokemon Fanboy, Member of the Year 2016, and Vizzed's #1 My Hero Academia fan


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 07-04-12
Location: Somewhere in Ohio
Last Post: 262 days
Last Active: 261 days

Links

Page Comments


This page has no comments

Adblocker detected!

Vizzed.com is very expensive to keep alive! The Ads pay for the servers.

Vizzed has 3 TB worth of games and 1 TB worth of music.  This site is free to use but the ads barely pay for the monthly server fees.  If too many more people use ad block, the site cannot survive.

We prioritize the community over the site profits.  This is why we avoid using annoying (but high paying) ads like most other sites which include popups, obnoxious sounds and animations, malware, and other forms of intrusiveness.  We'll do our part to never resort to these types of ads, please do your part by helping support this site by adding Vizzed.com to your ad blocking whitelist.

×