Hello WWE fans of Vizzed!

In the WWE world, there are wrestlers who are full timers who actually work with themselves and try their best of their full ability to do what they do best and then there are wrestlers who are part timers who come whenever they want and don't wrestle as much due to their busy schedules. Together, they both help to create the excitement and entertainment to the fans in their own different unique ways.
Examples of part-timers present and past: The Rock, Hulk Hogan, Brock Lesnar

My question is what do you think of part-timers in the WWE? Do they help the WWE or do they slowly destroy the entertainment in the WWE? 

I think they are " bad for business " as wrestlers. Brock Lensar was not the guy to beat the streak , if anybody was. These Part Time Champions are just not good. 

People bust their butts to get to where these guys are, and just because they were good 10 more years ago, BOOM! " here you go, here's a belt that we have been working this guy up to get for 2 years now. What about him? Oh, screw it. It's ' good for business'. " 

Yeah, I don't like the part time thing. Maybe, as managers or something, but as wrestlers? No. PPV would be alright, if it was built up, but not the way Brock Lensar and Rock are doing it. Chris Jericho is alright, but no titles. Maybe a tag title with somebody for a few weeks, to give the current champions a break, but nothing serious. 

You know as much as I was shocked and hated for Brock Lesner to be the one to end The Undertaker's streak, I personally think that made perfect sense, because I mean you wouldn't want to see wrestlers like Daniel Bryan to end the streak and be hated for that, and Brock Lesner is already hated because Brock Lesner is actually a jackass in real life (at least from what I have heard from youtube people), so that is why that made perfect sense for WWE to have Brock Lesner to end the streak!!


The Undertaker will probably have one more Wresltlemania, against Sting, the match that has been talked about for years!!


And as for Part-timers like, Brock, Rock and Hogan I think that is cool to have them because I mean they are legends and alot of people does love to see them!!


But can I make a suggestion here..... I think someone should make a thread asking who they think will take the WWE title from Lesner, I don't say it is gonna be Cena this Sunday night as he will put John Cena in the hospital!! I say Brock will keep the title until Wrestlemania and he'll have the title taken away from by Roman Reigns.... but then it could be possible that Lesner will have a breakdown for that loss and then beat Roman really bad and then Seth Rollins could be the first wrestler to cash in the Money in the Bank at Wresltemania and then take the title from Reigns!!

I would rather they give the opportunity and time to some of the younger and full time talents but part timers do have their place as they usually give the show a ratings boost and puts butts in seats.

Triple H once said "Charisma is something you can't teach" and the lack of charisma, chemistry and drawing power on some of current roster makes the need for part timers necessary in other to fill the void.

Personally, I'm not really a fan of part-timers. It just kind of bug's me when guys like Rock and Lesnar show up and are handed the titles, then can't even be bothered to show up on Raw. The Rocks title reign especially bothered me since he went on and on about how much 'passion' he had for the WWE, then he just pull's a no show nearly every week. Whether he wrote his promo's or someone else did, it was just a bad choice of words when it was known he couldn't appear. 

Then there's Jericho who has the opposite issue: When he's around, he's always competing, just never given any kind of title and is only used to put people over. He's such a great wrestler too. His returns are so painfully predictable though, its hard to get excited for him to come back when you know what he'll be used for. 

I guess I'm just of the mind that if you're a champion, you should be represented on Raw or SD and seem like you have a passion for wrestling, not just a paycheck. Stings even more when there are hard working, incredibly talented guys passed over quite often. 

I get that part-timers are a draw for some people and they'll always be around, but I don't feel they should hold titles. 

I don't mind the part-timers but when they get titles or win the Royal Rumble or something only to disappear right after Wrestlemania that bugs me. I love the visits you occasionally get from guys like Hulk Hogan or Shawn Michaels or Stone Cold but these guys don't get title runs. They show up to promote an event (get a paycheck) and then move on.

I prefer seeing the guys who want to prove themselves to get a push rather than putting the title on someone who isn't going to be there week in and week out.

tornadocam : The reason the Undertaker worked so well is because of the Streak. Even if the reports that say it was Takers decision to end the streak to Lesnar, I still think and always will think that it was a bad idea to end the streak to a part timer. If it had to be a big guy to dominate Taker, I think it should have been Roman Reigns, As soon as creative realizes what they have in him, that man is going places. I wouldn't put it past the WWE to make him the next John Cena. 
Reigns vs Taker would have been one hell of a match. Heck, I actually think they could have gone an hour, and it be an instant classic, no matter who won. 
Point being is this: Taker was good because of the streak. But, having Lesnar beat the streak was, how do The Authority put it? " Bad for Business . "

thing1:
You brought up a good point. You are right Reigns should have gotten that opportunity. I read were the original plan was to have Daniel Bryan beat Taker and end the streak giving Bryan a very big push . But it was found out he was going to have to have surgeries so that plan was taken out. I hope when Reigns comes back they give him a big push he has talent.  

tornadocam : Wait, where in the world did you read that at? I agree than Daniel Bryan is good, and deserves a push, but beating Taker? Yeah, no thanks. That is way too much. And surgery? I was not aware that he was going to need surgery until the Pay - per - view after where he faced Kane. 
And, the only reason I said Reigns is because he is a big guy, and I can see him being the next John Cena of the company. 

As for Brock Lesner.... I don't want to see wreslters such as Cena or Orton being the one to take the title from him.... I want to see someone like Roman Reigns being the one to so and then awhile after Seth Rollins would cash in his breifcase and take the title from him, I do say that Rollins is gonna take the title from one of the former members of the sheild!!

I agree with some of the opinions on here.

It's great to see some of the part-timers/previous wrestlers come back once in a while for the hype (and maybe to help the WWE with viewers and profits). Shouldn't they help the newer wrestlers with improving their reputation and performance in the WWE? I just hate how most part-timers just come once in a full moon like what Fishergirl7 said. Meanwhile there are/were those few part-timer wrestlers like Jericho and RVD who actually spend a lot of time and effort to help out newer wrestlers/talent which is what I like to see. In with the new and out with the old.

Also it feels right to me when someone who is willing to stay in the WWE and is fresh/new to win the Royal Rumble instead of a part-timer. The point of Royal Rumble is push that wrestler with all of the glory and hype for Wrestlemania. Usually Royal Rumble winners win.

Too bad that Bryan and Reigns are out in action for a while since they were doing good so far. I do like Rollins and Ambrose in the picture but not when it involves with Cena (yes, I am one of those minorities in the female audience that isn't a big Cena fan).

Undertaker should retire now especially he has no purpose nor is in shape to wrestle now. His time has officially come to end as much as I like his persona, dedication, history, and purpose in the WWE.

Awesome-Kid : Actually, that would be a great story line, except for the cashing in part. Roman Reigns vs Brock Lesnar has the potential to be an instant classic, with the way those two are both shipped and made to look. However, even thought Reigns vs Lensar would be a hellaish match, and it would even make perfect sense to have Rollins cash in at that time, I don't think that would be a good idea. 

Remember that Rollins almost succeeded to win the title just before Cena interfered at Night of Champions. Argh, I am still very disappointed that the main event got rigged. That would take some plan and strategy especially when Ambrose is watching Rollins very carefully.

ghostfishy : Even though I would hate for The Undertaker to retire since he happens to be my favourite wrestler of all time.... I actually agree with you.... I would like (just like everyone else) would like to see Taker .vs. Sting match)..... but you are totally right, it is probably time for Taker to retire because I mean there are some things wrong with like his bad hips and that...... and that is unfortunate as well because Taker is indeed one of the greatest wrestlers of all time!!

I hate the idea of wrestlers being part-timers. Look at Brock Lesnar. He is the World Heavyweight Champion and he only shows up to wrestling only part-time. What's the point of having a champion if they don't participate full-time? Brock doesn't even deserve to have the title in the first place because of this reason. Shoot, I don't think he deserves it at all. Why do they let these part-time wrestlers become champions anyways? They say it's best for business, but what it really is, is not best for business but screwing the other wrestlers at a shot for the title. We need to either beat Brock Lesnar for the title or strip Lesnar of the championship. END OF STORY!!!!

~PokePal435 has left the building~

PokePal435 : That's what everyone who posted on this thread pretty much agreed on. Lesnar should not be champion. I have a feeling that he is bumming at home, laughing at the wrestlers at WWE Raw or something.

It's ironic that the WWE writers wanted an active full time wrestler, Bryan, stripped off from the title before he was put off but yet, Lesnar is a part-timer that barely comes and hogs the title to himself with no problems.The full time wrestlers need the glory and work for the title instead of someone hogging it and barely showing up.

ghostfishy : Indeed. I couldn't have said it better myself. Paul Heyman just needs to see the fact that what John Cena told him before is true about Brock Lesnar. Brock Lesnar is a beast who care for nothing else but himself. Paul Heyman need to get that through his thick skull that Brock Lesnar doesn't care about him. He just wanted the title for himself.