Remove Ad, Sign Up
Register to Remove Ad
Register to Remove Ad
Remove Ad, Sign Up
Register to Remove Ad
Register to Remove Ad
Signup for Free!
-More Features-
-Far Less Ads-
About   Users   Help
Users & Guests Online
On Page: 1
Directory: 108
Entire Site: 5 & 843
Page Staff: pennylessz, pokemon x, Barathemos, tgags123, alexanyways, supercool22, RavusRat,
03-29-24 10:20 AM

Forum Links

WWE Part-Timers
What are your thoughts on them?
Related Threads
Coming Soon

Thread Information

Views
3,831
Replies
25
Rating
9
Status
CLOSED
Thread
Creator
ghostfishy
09-15-14 06:32 PM
Last
Post
Spicy
01-28-15 02:51 PM
Additional Thread Details
Views: 1,239
Today: 1
Users: 0 unique

Thread Actions

Thread Closed
New Thread
New Poll
Order
Posts


2 Pages
>>
 

WWE Part-Timers

 

09-15-14 06:32 PM
ghostfishy is Offline
| ID: 1079208 | 117 Words

ghostfishy
Level: 81


POSTS: 581/1867
POST EXP: 142688
LVL EXP: 4929891
CP: 5786.2
VIZ: 126108

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
Hello WWE fans of Vizzed!

In the WWE world, there are wrestlers who are full timers who actually work with themselves and try their best of their full ability to do what they do best and then there are wrestlers who are part timers who come whenever they want and don't wrestle as much due to their busy schedules. Together, they both help to create the excitement and entertainment to the fans in their own different unique ways.
Examples of part-timers present and past: The Rock, Hulk Hogan, Brock Lesnar

My question is what do you think of part-timers in the WWE? Do they help the WWE or do they slowly destroy the entertainment in the WWE? 
Hello WWE fans of Vizzed!

In the WWE world, there are wrestlers who are full timers who actually work with themselves and try their best of their full ability to do what they do best and then there are wrestlers who are part timers who come whenever they want and don't wrestle as much due to their busy schedules. Together, they both help to create the excitement and entertainment to the fans in their own different unique ways.
Examples of part-timers present and past: The Rock, Hulk Hogan, Brock Lesnar

My question is what do you think of part-timers in the WWE? Do they help the WWE or do they slowly destroy the entertainment in the WWE? 
Trusted Member
Master of Fishes


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 01-06-14
Last Post: 2685 days
Last Active: 2434 days

09-15-14 07:49 PM
thing1 is Offline
| ID: 1079225 | 152 Words

thing1
Thingywingy
Level: 219


POSTS: 10263/17208
POST EXP: 921418
LVL EXP: 156438129
CP: 31484.3
VIZ: 524983

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
I think they are " bad for business " as wrestlers. Brock Lensar was not the guy to beat the streak , if anybody was. These Part Time Champions are just not good. 

People bust their butts to get to where these guys are, and just because they were good 10 more years ago, BOOM! " here you go, here's a belt that we have been working this guy up to get for 2 years now. What about him? Oh, screw it. It's ' good for business'. " 

Yeah, I don't like the part time thing. Maybe, as managers or something, but as wrestlers? No. PPV would be alright, if it was built up, but not the way Brock Lensar and Rock are doing it. Chris Jericho is alright, but no titles. Maybe a tag title with somebody for a few weeks, to give the current champions a break, but nothing serious. 
I think they are " bad for business " as wrestlers. Brock Lensar was not the guy to beat the streak , if anybody was. These Part Time Champions are just not good. 

People bust their butts to get to where these guys are, and just because they were good 10 more years ago, BOOM! " here you go, here's a belt that we have been working this guy up to get for 2 years now. What about him? Oh, screw it. It's ' good for business'. " 

Yeah, I don't like the part time thing. Maybe, as managers or something, but as wrestlers? No. PPV would be alright, if it was built up, but not the way Brock Lensar and Rock are doing it. Chris Jericho is alright, but no titles. Maybe a tag title with somebody for a few weeks, to give the current champions a break, but nothing serious. 
Vizzed Elite
What is life?


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 02-03-11
Location: Washington DC Area
Last Post: 23 days
Last Active: 1 day

09-15-14 10:57 PM
Awesome-Kid is Offline
| ID: 1079261 | 258 Words

Awesome-Kid
Level: 106


POSTS: 3013/3081
POST EXP: 81066
LVL EXP: 12274738
CP: 12352.5
VIZ: 298331

Likes: 1  Dislikes: 0
You know as much as I was shocked and hated for Brock Lesner to be the one to end The Undertaker's streak, I personally think that made perfect sense, because I mean you wouldn't want to see wrestlers like Daniel Bryan to end the streak and be hated for that, and Brock Lesner is already hated because Brock Lesner is actually a jackass in real life (at least from what I have heard from youtube people), so that is why that made perfect sense for WWE to have Brock Lesner to end the streak!!


The Undertaker will probably have one more Wresltlemania, against Sting, the match that has been talked about for years!!


And as for Part-timers like, Brock, Rock and Hogan I think that is cool to have them because I mean they are legends and alot of people does love to see them!!


But can I make a suggestion here..... I think someone should make a thread asking who they think will take the WWE title from Lesner, I don't say it is gonna be Cena this Sunday night as he will put John Cena in the hospital!! I say Brock will keep the title until Wrestlemania and he'll have the title taken away from by Roman Reigns.... but then it could be possible that Lesner will have a breakdown for that loss and then beat Roman really bad and then Seth Rollins could be the first wrestler to cash in the Money in the Bank at Wresltemania and then take the title from Reigns!!
You know as much as I was shocked and hated for Brock Lesner to be the one to end The Undertaker's streak, I personally think that made perfect sense, because I mean you wouldn't want to see wrestlers like Daniel Bryan to end the streak and be hated for that, and Brock Lesner is already hated because Brock Lesner is actually a jackass in real life (at least from what I have heard from youtube people), so that is why that made perfect sense for WWE to have Brock Lesner to end the streak!!


The Undertaker will probably have one more Wresltlemania, against Sting, the match that has been talked about for years!!


And as for Part-timers like, Brock, Rock and Hogan I think that is cool to have them because I mean they are legends and alot of people does love to see them!!


But can I make a suggestion here..... I think someone should make a thread asking who they think will take the WWE title from Lesner, I don't say it is gonna be Cena this Sunday night as he will put John Cena in the hospital!! I say Brock will keep the title until Wrestlemania and he'll have the title taken away from by Roman Reigns.... but then it could be possible that Lesner will have a breakdown for that loss and then beat Roman really bad and then Seth Rollins could be the first wrestler to cash in the Money in the Bank at Wresltemania and then take the title from Reigns!!
Trusted Member

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 02-19-10
Location: Canada
Last Post: 1476 days
Last Active: 401 days

(edited by Awesome-Kid on 09-15-14 11:00 PM)     Post Rating: 1   Liked By: MysteryMan007,

09-16-14 08:06 AM
marxzero is Offline
| ID: 1079317 | 76 Words

marxzero
Level: 19

POSTS: 65/67
POST EXP: 3440
LVL EXP: 32551
CP: 167.7
VIZ: 27717

Likes: 1  Dislikes: 0
I would rather they give the opportunity and time to some of the younger and full time talents but part timers do have their place as they usually give the show a ratings boost and puts butts in seats.

Triple H once said "Charisma is something you can't teach" and the lack of charisma, chemistry and drawing power on some of current roster makes the need for part timers necessary in other to fill the void.
I would rather they give the opportunity and time to some of the younger and full time talents but part timers do have their place as they usually give the show a ratings boost and puts butts in seats.

Triple H once said "Charisma is something you can't teach" and the lack of charisma, chemistry and drawing power on some of current roster makes the need for part timers necessary in other to fill the void.
Member

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 08-06-14
Location: Texas
Last Post: 3473 days
Last Active: 3163 days

Post Rating: 1   Liked By: MysteryMan007,

09-24-14 08:53 PM
Fishergirl7 is Offline
| ID: 1081686 | 224 Words

Fishergirl7
Level: 78


POSTS: 1185/1505
POST EXP: 74384
LVL EXP: 4265115
CP: 1434.7
VIZ: 208427

Likes: 1  Dislikes: 0
Personally, I'm not really a fan of part-timers. It just kind of bug's me when guys like Rock and Lesnar show up and are handed the titles, then can't even be bothered to show up on Raw. The Rocks title reign especially bothered me since he went on and on about how much 'passion' he had for the WWE, then he just pull's a no show nearly every week. Whether he wrote his promo's or someone else did, it was just a bad choice of words when it was known he couldn't appear. 

Then there's Jericho who has the opposite issue: When he's around, he's always competing, just never given any kind of title and is only used to put people over. He's such a great wrestler too. His returns are so painfully predictable though, its hard to get excited for him to come back when you know what he'll be used for. 

I guess I'm just of the mind that if you're a champion, you should be represented on Raw or SD and seem like you have a passion for wrestling, not just a paycheck. Stings even more when there are hard working, incredibly talented guys passed over quite often. 

I get that part-timers are a draw for some people and they'll always be around, but I don't feel they should hold titles. 
Personally, I'm not really a fan of part-timers. It just kind of bug's me when guys like Rock and Lesnar show up and are handed the titles, then can't even be bothered to show up on Raw. The Rocks title reign especially bothered me since he went on and on about how much 'passion' he had for the WWE, then he just pull's a no show nearly every week. Whether he wrote his promo's or someone else did, it was just a bad choice of words when it was known he couldn't appear. 

Then there's Jericho who has the opposite issue: When he's around, he's always competing, just never given any kind of title and is only used to put people over. He's such a great wrestler too. His returns are so painfully predictable though, its hard to get excited for him to come back when you know what he'll be used for. 

I guess I'm just of the mind that if you're a champion, you should be represented on Raw or SD and seem like you have a passion for wrestling, not just a paycheck. Stings even more when there are hard working, incredibly talented guys passed over quite often. 

I get that part-timers are a draw for some people and they'll always be around, but I don't feel they should hold titles. 
Trusted Member
"The rain came pouring down. When I was drowning, that's when I could finally breathe."


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 08-18-09
Location: Canada
Last Post: 2404 days
Last Active: 2059 days

Post Rating: 1   Liked By: Awesome-Kid,

09-25-14 09:18 PM
geeogree is Offline
| ID: 1082059 | 97 Words

geeogree
Mr Geeohn-A-Vash53215
Level: 290


POSTS: 22385/29291
POST EXP: 1955397
LVL EXP: 420157637
CP: 52474.2
VIZ: 528748

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
I don't mind the part-timers but when they get titles or win the Royal Rumble or something only to disappear right after Wrestlemania that bugs me. I love the visits you occasionally get from guys like Hulk Hogan or Shawn Michaels or Stone Cold but these guys don't get title runs. They show up to promote an event (get a paycheck) and then move on.

I prefer seeing the guys who want to prove themselves to get a push rather than putting the title on someone who isn't going to be there week in and week out.
I don't mind the part-timers but when they get titles or win the Royal Rumble or something only to disappear right after Wrestlemania that bugs me. I love the visits you occasionally get from guys like Hulk Hogan or Shawn Michaels or Stone Cold but these guys don't get title runs. They show up to promote an event (get a paycheck) and then move on.

I prefer seeing the guys who want to prove themselves to get a push rather than putting the title on someone who isn't going to be there week in and week out.
Vizzed Elite
Former Admin
Banzilla


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 01-03-05
Last Post: 91 days
Last Active: 16 hours

09-25-14 09:33 PM
thing1 is Offline
| ID: 1082066 | 101 Words

thing1
Thingywingy
Level: 219


POSTS: 10395/17208
POST EXP: 921418
LVL EXP: 156438129
CP: 31484.3
VIZ: 524983

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
geeogree: Exactly how I feel about this. I mean, Maybe taking the US Title for a month or two to try to get it some momentum would be alright, but the major title ( there is only one now... I have to keep reminding myself of that ) I don't like seeing. Not even the IC title, because of the prestige that is has, even though WWE has pretty much abandoned it. Seeing The New Age Outlaws with the Tag Titles was cool and alright, because they were active, but a part time champion like Brock Lesnar is just not smart. 
geeogree: Exactly how I feel about this. I mean, Maybe taking the US Title for a month or two to try to get it some momentum would be alright, but the major title ( there is only one now... I have to keep reminding myself of that ) I don't like seeing. Not even the IC title, because of the prestige that is has, even though WWE has pretty much abandoned it. Seeing The New Age Outlaws with the Tag Titles was cool and alright, because they were active, but a part time champion like Brock Lesnar is just not smart. 
Vizzed Elite
What is life?


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 02-03-11
Location: Washington DC Area
Last Post: 23 days
Last Active: 1 day

09-25-14 09:57 PM
tornadocam is Offline
| ID: 1082078 | 267 Words

tornadocam
Level: 103


POSTS: 1193/3122
POST EXP: 781784
LVL EXP: 11359899
CP: 61424.1
VIZ: 4876874

Likes: 1  Dislikes: 0
I think it depends on the part-timer if they help or destroy a company. For Example from 2011-2014 The Undertaker was a par-time wrestler. He would only work 1 or 2 matches a year. But he helped the company because he was a huge draw and every year the fans looked forward to his return. So he was one that helped. 

Right now it seems like WWE is giving a part time Wrestler Brock Lesnar a real big push. But Brock being part time can actually work because it gives the WWE time to write storylines and it can also set up for Brock to lose the title or retain it at WM. 

Now, Here is were part timers do not work so well. Take Christian. He only wrestles a few time a year. At Christian's peak he was a good tag team champion. But now he is just on the roster taking up space. He has no story line and is not in any big matches. So when he does wrestle the match has no hype to it. In that case it could hurt the WWE. Another example is Hulk Hogan. Now I liked Hogan back in the day. But when he returned for a final time in WWE I think under Mr. America. It really did not do anything to help the company. In fact the story line was very ridiculous and with in a few months it was over like it never happened. 

So yeah, it depends on the wrestler and how the creative team handles it. Sometimes it can work and sometimes not.  
I think it depends on the part-timer if they help or destroy a company. For Example from 2011-2014 The Undertaker was a par-time wrestler. He would only work 1 or 2 matches a year. But he helped the company because he was a huge draw and every year the fans looked forward to his return. So he was one that helped. 

Right now it seems like WWE is giving a part time Wrestler Brock Lesnar a real big push. But Brock being part time can actually work because it gives the WWE time to write storylines and it can also set up for Brock to lose the title or retain it at WM. 

Now, Here is were part timers do not work so well. Take Christian. He only wrestles a few time a year. At Christian's peak he was a good tag team champion. But now he is just on the roster taking up space. He has no story line and is not in any big matches. So when he does wrestle the match has no hype to it. In that case it could hurt the WWE. Another example is Hulk Hogan. Now I liked Hogan back in the day. But when he returned for a final time in WWE I think under Mr. America. It really did not do anything to help the company. In fact the story line was very ridiculous and with in a few months it was over like it never happened. 

So yeah, it depends on the wrestler and how the creative team handles it. Sometimes it can work and sometimes not.  
Vizzed Elite

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 08-18-12
Last Post: 54 days
Last Active: 1 day

Post Rating: 1   Liked By: MysteryMan007,

09-26-14 12:00 AM
thing1 is Offline
| ID: 1082107 | 159 Words

thing1
Thingywingy
Level: 219


POSTS: 10405/17208
POST EXP: 921418
LVL EXP: 156438129
CP: 31484.3
VIZ: 524983

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
tornadocam : The reason the Undertaker worked so well is because of the Streak. Even if the reports that say it was Takers decision to end the streak to Lesnar, I still think and always will think that it was a bad idea to end the streak to a part timer. If it had to be a big guy to dominate Taker, I think it should have been Roman Reigns, As soon as creative realizes what they have in him, that man is going places. I wouldn't put it past the WWE to make him the next John Cena. 
Reigns vs Taker would have been one hell of a match. Heck, I actually think they could have gone an hour, and it be an instant classic, no matter who won. 
Point being is this: Taker was good because of the streak. But, having Lesnar beat the streak was, how do The Authority put it? " Bad for Business . "
tornadocam : The reason the Undertaker worked so well is because of the Streak. Even if the reports that say it was Takers decision to end the streak to Lesnar, I still think and always will think that it was a bad idea to end the streak to a part timer. If it had to be a big guy to dominate Taker, I think it should have been Roman Reigns, As soon as creative realizes what they have in him, that man is going places. I wouldn't put it past the WWE to make him the next John Cena. 
Reigns vs Taker would have been one hell of a match. Heck, I actually think they could have gone an hour, and it be an instant classic, no matter who won. 
Point being is this: Taker was good because of the streak. But, having Lesnar beat the streak was, how do The Authority put it? " Bad for Business . "
Vizzed Elite
What is life?


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 02-03-11
Location: Washington DC Area
Last Post: 23 days
Last Active: 1 day

09-26-14 02:53 PM
tornadocam is Offline
| ID: 1082298 | 74 Words

tornadocam
Level: 103


POSTS: 1195/3122
POST EXP: 781784
LVL EXP: 11359899
CP: 61424.1
VIZ: 4876874

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
thing1:
You brought up a good point. You are right Reigns should have gotten that opportunity. I read were the original plan was to have Daniel Bryan beat Taker and end the streak giving Bryan a very big push . But it was found out he was going to have to have surgeries so that plan was taken out. I hope when Reigns comes back they give him a big push he has talent.  
thing1:
You brought up a good point. You are right Reigns should have gotten that opportunity. I read were the original plan was to have Daniel Bryan beat Taker and end the streak giving Bryan a very big push . But it was found out he was going to have to have surgeries so that plan was taken out. I hope when Reigns comes back they give him a big push he has talent.  
Vizzed Elite

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 08-18-12
Last Post: 54 days
Last Active: 1 day

10-01-14 04:15 PM
thing1 is Offline
| ID: 1084287 | 85 Words

thing1
Thingywingy
Level: 219


POSTS: 10546/17208
POST EXP: 921418
LVL EXP: 156438129
CP: 31484.3
VIZ: 524983

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
tornadocam : Wait, where in the world did you read that at? I agree than Daniel Bryan is good, and deserves a push, but beating Taker? Yeah, no thanks. That is way too much. And surgery? I was not aware that he was going to need surgery until the Pay - per - view after where he faced Kane. 
And, the only reason I said Reigns is because he is a big guy, and I can see him being the next John Cena of the company. 
tornadocam : Wait, where in the world did you read that at? I agree than Daniel Bryan is good, and deserves a push, but beating Taker? Yeah, no thanks. That is way too much. And surgery? I was not aware that he was going to need surgery until the Pay - per - view after where he faced Kane. 
And, the only reason I said Reigns is because he is a big guy, and I can see him being the next John Cena of the company. 
Vizzed Elite
What is life?


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 02-03-11
Location: Washington DC Area
Last Post: 23 days
Last Active: 1 day

10-01-14 05:58 PM
tornadocam is Offline
| ID: 1084399 | 98 Words

tornadocam
Level: 103


POSTS: 1213/3122
POST EXP: 781784
LVL EXP: 11359899
CP: 61424.1
VIZ: 4876874

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
I'm not sure which website it was but I want to think it was Wrestle zone or Pro Wrestling sites that reported it. Don't know if it was true or not, but it made sense. Bryan was according to these sites was trying to go through pain then it was determined he needed neck surgery and later Tommy John Surgery. Yes I really like Reigns he has a lot of potential and just seems like he is ready to explode. Another one to keep an eye on is Bray Wyatt he has talent and a big guy too. 
I'm not sure which website it was but I want to think it was Wrestle zone or Pro Wrestling sites that reported it. Don't know if it was true or not, but it made sense. Bryan was according to these sites was trying to go through pain then it was determined he needed neck surgery and later Tommy John Surgery. Yes I really like Reigns he has a lot of potential and just seems like he is ready to explode. Another one to keep an eye on is Bray Wyatt he has talent and a big guy too. 
Vizzed Elite

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 08-18-12
Last Post: 54 days
Last Active: 1 day

10-01-14 08:16 PM
Awesome-Kid is Offline
| ID: 1084538 | 73 Words

Awesome-Kid
Level: 106


POSTS: 3019/3081
POST EXP: 81066
LVL EXP: 12274738
CP: 12352.5
VIZ: 298331

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
As for Brock Lesner.... I don't want to see wreslters such as Cena or Orton being the one to take the title from him.... I want to see someone like Roman Reigns being the one to so and then awhile after Seth Rollins would cash in his breifcase and take the title from him, I do say that Rollins is gonna take the title from one of the former members of the sheild!!
As for Brock Lesner.... I don't want to see wreslters such as Cena or Orton being the one to take the title from him.... I want to see someone like Roman Reigns being the one to so and then awhile after Seth Rollins would cash in his breifcase and take the title from him, I do say that Rollins is gonna take the title from one of the former members of the sheild!!
Trusted Member

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 02-19-10
Location: Canada
Last Post: 1476 days
Last Active: 401 days

(edited by Awesome-Kid on 10-01-14 08:17 PM)    

10-02-14 06:03 PM
ghostfishy is Offline
| ID: 1085075 | 251 Words

ghostfishy
Level: 81


POSTS: 626/1867
POST EXP: 142688
LVL EXP: 4929891
CP: 5786.2
VIZ: 126108

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
I agree with some of the opinions on here.

It's great to see some of the part-timers/previous wrestlers come back once in a while for the hype (and maybe to help the WWE with viewers and profits). Shouldn't they help the newer wrestlers with improving their reputation and performance in the WWE? I just hate how most part-timers just come once in a full moon like what Fishergirl7 said. Meanwhile there are/were those few part-timer wrestlers like Jericho and RVD who actually spend a lot of time and effort to help out newer wrestlers/talent which is what I like to see. In with the new and out with the old.

Also it feels right to me when someone who is willing to stay in the WWE and is fresh/new to win the Royal Rumble instead of a part-timer. The point of Royal Rumble is push that wrestler with all of the glory and hype for Wrestlemania. Usually Royal Rumble winners win.

Too bad that Bryan and Reigns are out in action for a while since they were doing good so far. I do like Rollins and Ambrose in the picture but not when it involves with Cena (yes, I am one of those minorities in the female audience that isn't a big Cena fan).

Undertaker should retire now especially he has no purpose nor is in shape to wrestle now. His time has officially come to end as much as I like his persona, dedication, history, and purpose in the WWE.
I agree with some of the opinions on here.

It's great to see some of the part-timers/previous wrestlers come back once in a while for the hype (and maybe to help the WWE with viewers and profits). Shouldn't they help the newer wrestlers with improving their reputation and performance in the WWE? I just hate how most part-timers just come once in a full moon like what Fishergirl7 said. Meanwhile there are/were those few part-timer wrestlers like Jericho and RVD who actually spend a lot of time and effort to help out newer wrestlers/talent which is what I like to see. In with the new and out with the old.

Also it feels right to me when someone who is willing to stay in the WWE and is fresh/new to win the Royal Rumble instead of a part-timer. The point of Royal Rumble is push that wrestler with all of the glory and hype for Wrestlemania. Usually Royal Rumble winners win.

Too bad that Bryan and Reigns are out in action for a while since they were doing good so far. I do like Rollins and Ambrose in the picture but not when it involves with Cena (yes, I am one of those minorities in the female audience that isn't a big Cena fan).

Undertaker should retire now especially he has no purpose nor is in shape to wrestle now. His time has officially come to end as much as I like his persona, dedication, history, and purpose in the WWE.
Trusted Member
Master of Fishes


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 01-06-14
Last Post: 2685 days
Last Active: 2434 days

10-02-14 06:24 PM
thing1 is Offline
| ID: 1085095 | 75 Words

thing1
Thingywingy
Level: 219


POSTS: 10619/17208
POST EXP: 921418
LVL EXP: 156438129
CP: 31484.3
VIZ: 524983

Likes: 1  Dislikes: 0
Awesome-Kid : Actually, that would be a great story line, except for the cashing in part. Roman Reigns vs Brock Lesnar has the potential to be an instant classic, with the way those two are both shipped and made to look. However, even thought Reigns vs Lensar would be a hellaish match, and it would even make perfect sense to have Rollins cash in at that time, I don't think that would be a good idea. 
Awesome-Kid : Actually, that would be a great story line, except for the cashing in part. Roman Reigns vs Brock Lesnar has the potential to be an instant classic, with the way those two are both shipped and made to look. However, even thought Reigns vs Lensar would be a hellaish match, and it would even make perfect sense to have Rollins cash in at that time, I don't think that would be a good idea. 
Vizzed Elite
What is life?


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 02-03-11
Location: Washington DC Area
Last Post: 23 days
Last Active: 1 day

Post Rating: 1   Liked By: Awesome-Kid,

10-02-14 06:32 PM
ghostfishy is Offline
| ID: 1085108 | 44 Words

ghostfishy
Level: 81


POSTS: 630/1867
POST EXP: 142688
LVL EXP: 4929891
CP: 5786.2
VIZ: 126108

Likes: 1  Dislikes: 0
Remember that Rollins almost succeeded to win the title just before Cena interfered at Night of Champions. Argh, I am still very disappointed that the main event got rigged. That would take some plan and strategy especially when Ambrose is watching Rollins very carefully.
Remember that Rollins almost succeeded to win the title just before Cena interfered at Night of Champions. Argh, I am still very disappointed that the main event got rigged. That would take some plan and strategy especially when Ambrose is watching Rollins very carefully.
Trusted Member
Master of Fishes


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 01-06-14
Last Post: 2685 days
Last Active: 2434 days

Post Rating: 1   Liked By: Awesome-Kid,

10-03-14 06:41 AM
Awesome-Kid is Offline
| ID: 1085553 | 88 Words

Awesome-Kid
Level: 106


POSTS: 3021/3081
POST EXP: 81066
LVL EXP: 12274738
CP: 12352.5
VIZ: 298331

Likes: 1  Dislikes: 0
ghostfishy : Even though I would hate for The Undertaker to retire since he happens to be my favourite wrestler of all time.... I actually agree with you.... I would like (just like everyone else) would like to see Taker .vs. Sting match)..... but you are totally right, it is probably time for Taker to retire because I mean there are some things wrong with like his bad hips and that...... and that is unfortunate as well because Taker is indeed one of the greatest wrestlers of all time!!
ghostfishy : Even though I would hate for The Undertaker to retire since he happens to be my favourite wrestler of all time.... I actually agree with you.... I would like (just like everyone else) would like to see Taker .vs. Sting match)..... but you are totally right, it is probably time for Taker to retire because I mean there are some things wrong with like his bad hips and that...... and that is unfortunate as well because Taker is indeed one of the greatest wrestlers of all time!!
Trusted Member

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 02-19-10
Location: Canada
Last Post: 1476 days
Last Active: 401 days

Post Rating: 1   Liked By: ghostfishy,

11-13-14 09:36 PM
PokePal435 is Offline
| ID: 1104228 | 125 Words

PokePal435
Level: 25

POSTS: 81/124
POST EXP: 24435
LVL EXP: 81556
CP: 1081.7
VIZ: 34612

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
I hate the idea of wrestlers being part-timers. Look at Brock Lesnar. He is the World Heavyweight Champion and he only shows up to wrestling only part-time. What's the point of having a champion if they don't participate full-time? Brock doesn't even deserve to have the title in the first place because of this reason. Shoot, I don't think he deserves it at all. Why do they let these part-time wrestlers become champions anyways? They say it's best for business, but what it really is, is not best for business but screwing the other wrestlers at a shot for the title. We need to either beat Brock Lesnar for the title or strip Lesnar of the championship. END OF STORY!!!!

~PokePal435 has left the building~
I hate the idea of wrestlers being part-timers. Look at Brock Lesnar. He is the World Heavyweight Champion and he only shows up to wrestling only part-time. What's the point of having a champion if they don't participate full-time? Brock doesn't even deserve to have the title in the first place because of this reason. Shoot, I don't think he deserves it at all. Why do they let these part-time wrestlers become champions anyways? They say it's best for business, but what it really is, is not best for business but screwing the other wrestlers at a shot for the title. We need to either beat Brock Lesnar for the title or strip Lesnar of the championship. END OF STORY!!!!

~PokePal435 has left the building~
Member

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 09-09-14
Location: USA
Last Post: 3036 days
Last Active: 1967 days

11-14-14 12:42 AM
ghostfishy is Offline
| ID: 1104257 | 100 Words

ghostfishy
Level: 81


POSTS: 1440/1867
POST EXP: 142688
LVL EXP: 4929891
CP: 5786.2
VIZ: 126108

Likes: 1  Dislikes: 0
PokePal435 : That's what everyone who posted on this thread pretty much agreed on. Lesnar should not be champion. I have a feeling that he is bumming at home, laughing at the wrestlers at WWE Raw or something.

It's ironic that the WWE writers wanted an active full time wrestler, Bryan, stripped off from the title before he was put off but yet, Lesnar is a part-timer that barely comes and hogs the title to himself with no problems.The full time wrestlers need the glory and work for the title instead of someone hogging it and barely showing up.
PokePal435 : That's what everyone who posted on this thread pretty much agreed on. Lesnar should not be champion. I have a feeling that he is bumming at home, laughing at the wrestlers at WWE Raw or something.

It's ironic that the WWE writers wanted an active full time wrestler, Bryan, stripped off from the title before he was put off but yet, Lesnar is a part-timer that barely comes and hogs the title to himself with no problems.The full time wrestlers need the glory and work for the title instead of someone hogging it and barely showing up.
Trusted Member
Master of Fishes


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 01-06-14
Last Post: 2685 days
Last Active: 2434 days

Post Rating: 1   Liked By: PokePal435,

11-14-14 10:25 AM
PokePal435 is Offline
| ID: 1104319 | 65 Words

PokePal435
Level: 25

POSTS: 86/124
POST EXP: 24435
LVL EXP: 81556
CP: 1081.7
VIZ: 34612

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
ghostfishy : Indeed. I couldn't have said it better myself. Paul Heyman just needs to see the fact that what John Cena told him before is true about Brock Lesnar. Brock Lesnar is a beast who care for nothing else but himself. Paul Heyman need to get that through his thick skull that Brock Lesnar doesn't care about him. He just wanted the title for himself.
ghostfishy : Indeed. I couldn't have said it better myself. Paul Heyman just needs to see the fact that what John Cena told him before is true about Brock Lesnar. Brock Lesnar is a beast who care for nothing else but himself. Paul Heyman need to get that through his thick skull that Brock Lesnar doesn't care about him. He just wanted the title for himself.
Member

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 09-09-14
Location: USA
Last Post: 3036 days
Last Active: 1967 days

Links

Page Comments


This page has no comments

Adblocker detected!

Vizzed.com is very expensive to keep alive! The Ads pay for the servers.

Vizzed has 3 TB worth of games and 1 TB worth of music.  This site is free to use but the ads barely pay for the monthly server fees.  If too many more people use ad block, the site cannot survive.

We prioritize the community over the site profits.  This is why we avoid using annoying (but high paying) ads like most other sites which include popups, obnoxious sounds and animations, malware, and other forms of intrusiveness.  We'll do our part to never resort to these types of ads, please do your part by helping support this site by adding Vizzed.com to your ad blocking whitelist.

×