Remove Ad, Sign Up
Register to Remove Ad
Register to Remove Ad
Remove Ad, Sign Up
Register to Remove Ad
Register to Remove Ad
Signup for Free!
-More Features-
-Far Less Ads-
About   Users   Help
Users & Guests Online
On Page: 1
Directory: 347
Entire Site: 7 & 1208
Page Staff: pennylessz, pokemon x, Barathemos, tgags123, alexanyways, supercool22, RavusRat,
04-25-24 02:29 PM

Forum Links

NFL Passes New Rule
No leading with the crown of the helmet outside the tackle box
Related Threads
Coming Soon

Thread Information

Views
886
Replies
9
Rating
1
Status
CLOSED
Thread
Creator
Crazy Li
03-21-13 05:26 PM
Last
Post
dkmec20
05-22-13 10:38 PM
Additional Thread Details
Views: 257
Today: 0
Users: 0 unique

Thread Actions

Thread Closed
New Thread
New Poll
Order
 

NFL Passes New Rule

 

03-21-13 05:26 PM
Crazy Li is Offline
| ID: 760519 | 241 Words

Crazy Li
Level: 84


POSTS: 1918/1945
POST EXP: 216635
LVL EXP: 5581432
CP: 4056.9
VIZ: 182075

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
So I heard on NFL Network today at work that the NFL passed a new rule that would forbid ball-carriers from leading with the crown of their helmets when outside the tackle box. I'm curious what football fans think of this rule.

I personally feel it's the final nail in the coffin to the running game in the NFL.

Over the past several years, there have been many rules passed to make passing easier and it's made teams go to the air a lot more and almost abandon their running games. It's gotten to the point where no one plays smash-mouth football, grinding it out for a few yards on 3rd and short anymore. They just pass. Running has become unpopular and the role of the running back devalued. Now with this latest rule, it's going to be so much harder for running backs to establish themselves in the league. It's pretty much instinctual for these guys to lower their heads and brace themselves for an oncoming tackle. Now they can't legally do it. As if power backs weren't already a thing of the past, this is really going to be the case now as it's hard to run over someone if you're worried about making sure to keep your head up. This may also lead to an increase in fumbles as you create more space for the defender to grab at the ball and try to rip it free.

Thoughts?
So I heard on NFL Network today at work that the NFL passed a new rule that would forbid ball-carriers from leading with the crown of their helmets when outside the tackle box. I'm curious what football fans think of this rule.

I personally feel it's the final nail in the coffin to the running game in the NFL.

Over the past several years, there have been many rules passed to make passing easier and it's made teams go to the air a lot more and almost abandon their running games. It's gotten to the point where no one plays smash-mouth football, grinding it out for a few yards on 3rd and short anymore. They just pass. Running has become unpopular and the role of the running back devalued. Now with this latest rule, it's going to be so much harder for running backs to establish themselves in the league. It's pretty much instinctual for these guys to lower their heads and brace themselves for an oncoming tackle. Now they can't legally do it. As if power backs weren't already a thing of the past, this is really going to be the case now as it's hard to run over someone if you're worried about making sure to keep your head up. This may also lead to an increase in fumbles as you create more space for the defender to grab at the ball and try to rip it free.

Thoughts?
Vizzed Elite
Everyone's Favorite Monkey


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 09-21-12
Location: out of this world
Last Post: 3676 days
Last Active: 2032 days

03-21-13 05:32 PM
merf is Offline
| ID: 760523 | 48 Words

merf
mrfe
merfeo7
Level: 133


POSTS: 1366/5594
POST EXP: 340235
LVL EXP: 27442068
CP: 22020.8
VIZ: 4604152

Likes: 1  Dislikes: 0
Crazy Li : Thoughts? It's a stupid rule. It never should have gotten passed. Football will be a lot worse because of it. I hope nothing like that ever happens with college football.

I'm not very pleased about the new rule. My guess is that it won't last long.
Crazy Li : Thoughts? It's a stupid rule. It never should have gotten passed. Football will be a lot worse because of it. I hope nothing like that ever happens with college football.

I'm not very pleased about the new rule. My guess is that it won't last long.
Site Staff
Minecraft Admin
[1:32 AM] A user of this: wALL'D MYNERD


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 07-15-12
Location: Alberta, Canada
Last Post: 119 days
Last Active: 2 days

Post Rating: 1   Liked By: SuperToads,

03-22-13 06:34 AM
Azul Fria is Offline
| ID: 760878 | 32 Words

Azul Fria
Level: 58


POSTS: 144/806
POST EXP: 151458
LVL EXP: 1486256
CP: 24516.0
VIZ: 773884

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
College Football already has an even stupider rule in place with the no pre-touchdown celebration rule so if this new rule passes into college ball then that's gonna be a bigger blow.
College Football already has an even stupider rule in place with the no pre-touchdown celebration rule so if this new rule passes into college ball then that's gonna be a bigger blow.
Vizzed Elite
Ice Queen Zero


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 10-06-12
Last Post: 1820 days
Last Active: 19 days

03-22-13 01:20 PM
Crazy Li is Offline
| ID: 760998 | 118 Words

Crazy Li
Level: 84


POSTS: 1921/1945
POST EXP: 216635
LVL EXP: 5581432
CP: 4056.9
VIZ: 182075

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
Azul Fria : Who cares about pre-touchdown celebrations? I actually think it's a silly thing to do. Celebrating when you didn't even score? All you're doing his holding up the game. I think they're right to issue penalties if someone celebrates inappropriately.

I remember watching the Niners play the Packers in this past playoffs. Kaepernick ran for a 15-yard first down and then spiked the ball in celebration like he really did something special. I mean... sure, it was a great run and a much-needed play... but he should be focusing on finishing off the drive, not a mere first down. I think the 15-yard penalty that came to follow was helpful in bringing him back down to earth.
Azul Fria : Who cares about pre-touchdown celebrations? I actually think it's a silly thing to do. Celebrating when you didn't even score? All you're doing his holding up the game. I think they're right to issue penalties if someone celebrates inappropriately.

I remember watching the Niners play the Packers in this past playoffs. Kaepernick ran for a 15-yard first down and then spiked the ball in celebration like he really did something special. I mean... sure, it was a great run and a much-needed play... but he should be focusing on finishing off the drive, not a mere first down. I think the 15-yard penalty that came to follow was helpful in bringing him back down to earth.
Vizzed Elite
Everyone's Favorite Monkey


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 09-21-12
Location: out of this world
Last Post: 3676 days
Last Active: 2032 days

03-22-13 01:27 PM
patar4097 is Offline
| ID: 761003 | 131 Words

patar4097
Level: 131


POSTS: 2007/5166
POST EXP: 330330
LVL EXP: 26064713
CP: 22170.1
VIZ: 410076

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
This is an awful rule. Like you said, running backs are already almost unneeded positions now. And if they do get to carry the ball, they won't get very far. You need to get your body low to be able to avoid the tackles. I hope this rule get's kicked out as soon as possible.  I know they are trying to make it safer, but eventually, you are not just changing the rules, you are changing the game, and if they change the game, nobody will watch. Football NEEDS to have the big hits, and all these things that they are trying to eliminate, or it won't be football. As of now, the players know what they are getting into. If they don't want the risk, then don't play the sport.
This is an awful rule. Like you said, running backs are already almost unneeded positions now. And if they do get to carry the ball, they won't get very far. You need to get your body low to be able to avoid the tackles. I hope this rule get's kicked out as soon as possible.  I know they are trying to make it safer, but eventually, you are not just changing the rules, you are changing the game, and if they change the game, nobody will watch. Football NEEDS to have the big hits, and all these things that they are trying to eliminate, or it won't be football. As of now, the players know what they are getting into. If they don't want the risk, then don't play the sport.
Vizzed Elite

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 10-28-10
Last Post: 1956 days
Last Active: 769 days

03-22-13 01:28 PM
Eirinn is Offline
| ID: 761004 | 43 Words

Eirinn
Level: 154


POSTS: 1207/7900
POST EXP: 1300417
LVL EXP: 46038446
CP: 69368.0
VIZ: 1836533

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
It's a terrible idea. Not only will it kill the running game, or make it harder to avoid fumbles, it will also make backs more susceptible to injury. You're putting a sign on him that says "hit me, please!". No tucking = vulnerability.
It's a terrible idea. Not only will it kill the running game, or make it harder to avoid fumbles, it will also make backs more susceptible to injury. You're putting a sign on him that says "hit me, please!". No tucking = vulnerability.
Vizzed Elite
Eirinn


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 07-18-12
Last Post: 2059 days
Last Active: 2059 days

03-22-13 01:36 PM
Crazy Li is Offline
| ID: 761010 | 50 Words

Crazy Li
Level: 84


POSTS: 1924/1945
POST EXP: 216635
LVL EXP: 5581432
CP: 4056.9
VIZ: 182075

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
Yeah, it doesn't REALLY make the game safer... because you make it more dangerous to be a running back. Even if you made it safer for a tackler, you make it more dangerous for the one being tackled as a trade-off... and isn't that the person who needs protection more?
Yeah, it doesn't REALLY make the game safer... because you make it more dangerous to be a running back. Even if you made it safer for a tackler, you make it more dangerous for the one being tackled as a trade-off... and isn't that the person who needs protection more?
Vizzed Elite
Everyone's Favorite Monkey


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 09-21-12
Location: out of this world
Last Post: 3676 days
Last Active: 2032 days

03-25-13 07:26 PM
Barathemos is Offline
| ID: 763436 | 26 Words

Barathemos
Level: 205


POSTS: 422/15635
POST EXP: 668938
LVL EXP: 124947076
CP: 46550.1
VIZ: 892425

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
This was a disappointment to me because I am a Falcons fan and they just picked up Stephan Jackson, and he does this all the time. 
This was a disappointment to me because I am a Falcons fan and they just picked up Stephan Jackson, and he does this all the time. 
Site Staff
Minecraft Admin

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 02-17-13
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Last Post: 26 days
Last Active: 8 days

04-29-13 03:58 PM
Batcake is Offline
| ID: 790273 | 32 Words

Batcake
Black Bot
Level: 105


POSTS: 711/3246
POST EXP: 146939
LVL EXP: 11996674
CP: 5867.6
VIZ: 3347

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
There was a new rule? I sure never heard of it, But, okay. I agree with Barathemos. I am also a Falcons fan as well, and this is not good for Jackson.
There was a new rule? I sure never heard of it, But, okay. I agree with Barathemos. I am also a Falcons fan as well, and this is not good for Jackson.
Member
hi


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 10-17-12
Location: US
Last Post: 770 days
Last Active: 150 days

05-22-13 10:38 PM
dkmec20 is Offline
| ID: 801831 | 38 Words

dkmec20
Level: 95


POSTS: 2375/2498
POST EXP: 62177
LVL EXP: 8638836
CP: 560.8
VIZ: 35447

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
I myself am not a big fan of this rule.  I know they'e trying to make the game more safe but this is a little bit too over the top.  It basically makes runners defenseless in some situations.  
I myself am not a big fan of this rule.  I know they'e trying to make the game more safe but this is a little bit too over the top.  It basically makes runners defenseless in some situations.  
Trusted Member
Phil. 3:7-11


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 03-17-11
Location: KY, USA
Last Post: 83 days
Last Active: 6 hours

Links

Page Comments


This page has no comments

Adblocker detected!

Vizzed.com is very expensive to keep alive! The Ads pay for the servers.

Vizzed has 3 TB worth of games and 1 TB worth of music.  This site is free to use but the ads barely pay for the monthly server fees.  If too many more people use ad block, the site cannot survive.

We prioritize the community over the site profits.  This is why we avoid using annoying (but high paying) ads like most other sites which include popups, obnoxious sounds and animations, malware, and other forms of intrusiveness.  We'll do our part to never resort to these types of ads, please do your part by helping support this site by adding Vizzed.com to your ad blocking whitelist.

×