Remove Ad, Sign Up
Register to Remove Ad
Register to Remove Ad
Remove Ad, Sign Up
Register to Remove Ad
Register to Remove Ad
Register
Signup for Free!
-More Features-
-Far Less Ads-
☷ Vizzed.com Play Retro Games Vizzed Board Video Games Game Music Market Minecraft (1) Radio Widgets Virtual Bible
☷ Register   Login  
All Threads New Posts Contribution Points Your Threads News and Updates Active Users User Ranks
About   Users   Help
Users & Guests Online
On Page: 1
Directory: 1 & 132
Entire Site: 7 & 1066
Page Staff: pennylessz, pokemon x, Barathemos, tgags123, alexanyways, RavusRat,
04-19-24 11:57 AM

Forum Links

Related Threads
Coming Soon

Thread Information

Views
976
Replies
9
Rating
0
Status
CLOSED
Thread
Creator
Oldschool41
10-02-12 04:10 PM
Last
Post
Singelli
10-05-12 10:08 PM
Additional Thread Details
Views: 181
Today: 0
Users: 0 unique

Thread Actions

Thread Closed
New Thread
New Poll
Order
 

Should Airlines and Resturants

 

10-02-12 04:10 PM
Oldschool41 is Offline
Link
| ID: 662116 | 41 Words

Oldschool41
Level: 83

POSTS: 159/1799
POST EXP: 163693
LVL EXP: 5353637
CP: 977.6
VIZ: 17776

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
I'll clerify what I mean cause this might be confusing. What I mean is should an Airline or Resturant be allowed deny service to a child (not teenager) if that child is being unruly, rude, or making a scene and why?
I'll clerify what I mean cause this might be confusing. What I mean is should an Airline or Resturant be allowed deny service to a child (not teenager) if that child is being unruly, rude, or making a scene and why?
Trusted Member
A wise man speaks because he has something to say. A fool speaks because he has to say something.


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 10-27-10
Last Post: 2795 days
Last Active: 2356 days

10-02-12 04:37 PM
mr.keys is Offline
Link
| ID: 662165 | 59 Words

mr.keys
Level: 83


POSTS: 1173/1773
POST EXP: 57776
LVL EXP: 5341721
CP: 15.1
VIZ: 1318

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
I only think they should deny service from little children if the kids don't have any money. Thats just how i feel about the situation. Yes they should deny if they are being rude because i wouldn't want to serve somebody thats being rude to me or getting all up in my face like they bout to do something.
I only think they should deny service from little children if the kids don't have any money. Thats just how i feel about the situation. Yes they should deny if they are being rude because i wouldn't want to serve somebody thats being rude to me or getting all up in my face like they bout to do something.
Perma Banned
Astronaut Status


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 04-13-10
Location: Mars
Last Post: 4204 days
Last Active: 4204 days

10-02-12 04:45 PM
Oldschool41 is Offline
Link
| ID: 662177 | 78 Words

Oldschool41
Level: 83

POSTS: 169/1799
POST EXP: 163693
LVL EXP: 5353637
CP: 977.6
VIZ: 17776

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
I'll give you an example of a situation involving a Resturant denying children service.


http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,2084234,00.html

Or to those who don't want to read a time.com article. A resturant near Pittsburgh has banned child from age 6 to younger from entering the store. The owner said that he did so because customer's have been complaining about the disruption the children make and the parents who were not attempting to calm the children down. This is a general summary btw.
I'll give you an example of a situation involving a Resturant denying children service.


http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,2084234,00.html

Or to those who don't want to read a time.com article. A resturant near Pittsburgh has banned child from age 6 to younger from entering the store. The owner said that he did so because customer's have been complaining about the disruption the children make and the parents who were not attempting to calm the children down. This is a general summary btw.
Trusted Member
A wise man speaks because he has something to say. A fool speaks because he has to say something.


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 10-27-10
Last Post: 2795 days
Last Active: 2356 days

10-04-12 10:44 PM
SunflowerGaming is Offline
Link
| ID: 665097 | 65 Words

Level: 93


POSTS: 1663/2319
POST EXP: 140711
LVL EXP: 7954385
CP: 1019.0
VIZ: 131239

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
I think that if the child is disturbing the other customers with their negative actions then yes, the workers should kindly ask the people to leave or get the child to stop what they're doing. I think they should at least give the family one warning first and if they don't take care of the problem, then they should ask them to leave the establishment.
I think that if the child is disturbing the other customers with their negative actions then yes, the workers should kindly ask the people to leave or get the child to stop what they're doing. I think they should at least give the family one warning first and if they don't take care of the problem, then they should ask them to leave the establishment.
Trusted Member
Courage is not having the strength to go on, it's going on when you don't have the strength. ????


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 05-29-10
Location: United States
Last Post: 878 days
Last Active: 878 days

10-04-12 10:59 PM
Ktanaqui is Offline
Link
| ID: 665120 | 51 Words

Ktanaqui
Level: 72


POSTS: 612/1340
POST EXP: 96116
LVL EXP: 3195646
CP: 1759.5
VIZ: 665676

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
Should they be allowed to deny service to children? No. Children should not be any more limited than the parents that they belong to. Except in obvious situations like bars and the like. However, I can understand if the parent/s were asked to remove themselves if the child is a problem.
Should they be allowed to deny service to children? No. Children should not be any more limited than the parents that they belong to. Except in obvious situations like bars and the like. However, I can understand if the parent/s were asked to remove themselves if the child is a problem.
Trusted Member

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 09-05-12
Location: Alabama
Last Post: 2369 days
Last Active: 2010 days

10-04-12 11:12 PM
Mobouis1 is Offline
Link
| ID: 665149 | 34 Words

Mobouis1
Level: 72


POSTS: 1038/1320
POST EXP: 42307
LVL EXP: 3179286
CP: 343.7
VIZ: 35024

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
TO me it depend on how the kid act, and if the kid have the money. If they act all rude or keep bothering the people around them then they should denied the kid.
TO me it depend on how the kid act, and if the kid have the money. If they act all rude or keep bothering the people around them then they should denied the kid.
Trusted Member

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 04-07-12
Last Post: 3963 days
Last Active: 2765 days

10-05-12 06:59 AM
warmaker is Offline
Link
| ID: 665354 | 200 Words

warmaker
Level: 91

POSTS: 767/2198
POST EXP: 240742
LVL EXP: 7359492
CP: 4969.1
VIZ: 198528

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
It may be illegal to do so with the Interstate Commerce Act but I believe restaurants want to create a certain atmosphere that people can enjoy.  They certainly should be able to ban children as some bars and clubs don't allow kids under 18 or under 21 to enter.  I'm completely comfortable with it and I like the idea.  I don't have kids and I don't want to hear kids cry and scream and misbehave in a restaurant while I'm trying to enjoy a meal with my wife.

Saying that, the restaurants that lose out on family money will help other restaurants built for families make more.  TGI Friday's will get more traffic because they do serve children.

I work in a YMCA.  We have a family locker room and we have locker rooms for men and women 13 and up.  It works perfectly.  Little kids aren't wandering around making noise and being a nuisance.  Of course, there's nudity involved with locker rooms but the rooms themselves are quieter, more peaceful, and more enjoyable.  Families like the way the other space is created which gives them more space and privacy and kids can have fun without bothering others.

I'm sold.
It may be illegal to do so with the Interstate Commerce Act but I believe restaurants want to create a certain atmosphere that people can enjoy.  They certainly should be able to ban children as some bars and clubs don't allow kids under 18 or under 21 to enter.  I'm completely comfortable with it and I like the idea.  I don't have kids and I don't want to hear kids cry and scream and misbehave in a restaurant while I'm trying to enjoy a meal with my wife.

Saying that, the restaurants that lose out on family money will help other restaurants built for families make more.  TGI Friday's will get more traffic because they do serve children.

I work in a YMCA.  We have a family locker room and we have locker rooms for men and women 13 and up.  It works perfectly.  Little kids aren't wandering around making noise and being a nuisance.  Of course, there's nudity involved with locker rooms but the rooms themselves are quieter, more peaceful, and more enjoyable.  Families like the way the other space is created which gives them more space and privacy and kids can have fun without bothering others.

I'm sold.
Trusted Member

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 05-02-10
Location: Honolulu, HI
Last Post: 3196 days
Last Active: 2859 days

10-05-12 12:55 PM
Deadman9001 is Offline
Link
| ID: 665583 | 148 Words

Deadman9001
Level: 33

POSTS: 120/211
POST EXP: 28725
LVL EXP: 212894
CP: 529.6
VIZ: 19917

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
I think that families more specifically the parents should be told to leave the establishment if their kids are disruptive. It might not be fair that mommy and daddy have to leave a movie just because Tommy kept whining, but hey its just a couple customers who need to work on letting their children know where it is appropriate to do certain things and where to not do others.   If you have a newborn or any infant unable to understand then I guess I could understand and just politely ask them to get their child to go to nap time or find a way to distract the child from its upset mood.  But if I were an owner of any of those establishments I would most likely tell the parents to leave if I found their child was continuing to be rude and disrespectful after a prior warning.
I think that families more specifically the parents should be told to leave the establishment if their kids are disruptive. It might not be fair that mommy and daddy have to leave a movie just because Tommy kept whining, but hey its just a couple customers who need to work on letting their children know where it is appropriate to do certain things and where to not do others.   If you have a newborn or any infant unable to understand then I guess I could understand and just politely ask them to get their child to go to nap time or find a way to distract the child from its upset mood.  But if I were an owner of any of those establishments I would most likely tell the parents to leave if I found their child was continuing to be rude and disrespectful after a prior warning.
Trusted Member

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 02-02-11
Location: Death Valley
Last Post: 3456 days
Last Active: 569 days

10-05-12 01:04 PM
Oldschool41 is Offline
Link
| ID: 665591 | 97 Words

Oldschool41
Level: 83

POSTS: 346/1799
POST EXP: 163693
LVL EXP: 5353637
CP: 977.6
VIZ: 17776

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
Warkmaker: That would be interesting to see how a court would rule on something like this. But until a lawsuit is filed, we'll never know (I believe that a lawsuit could file if its a major resturant like Applebees, Chiles, or Hooters...ok maybe not Hooters.)

Also I agree with you that family built resturants will make more money; but resturants that banned children that I was shocked to fine actually gained money by doing so (in the example that I posted last time people as far away as Cleveland were making resurvations...and the resturant was near Pittsburgh!)
Warkmaker: That would be interesting to see how a court would rule on something like this. But until a lawsuit is filed, we'll never know (I believe that a lawsuit could file if its a major resturant like Applebees, Chiles, or Hooters...ok maybe not Hooters.)

Also I agree with you that family built resturants will make more money; but resturants that banned children that I was shocked to fine actually gained money by doing so (in the example that I posted last time people as far away as Cleveland were making resurvations...and the resturant was near Pittsburgh!)
Trusted Member
A wise man speaks because he has something to say. A fool speaks because he has to say something.


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 10-27-10
Last Post: 2795 days
Last Active: 2356 days

10-05-12 10:08 PM
Singelli is Offline
Link
| ID: 666317 | 99 Words

Singelli
Level: 161


POSTS: 395/8698
POST EXP: 1189395
LVL EXP: 53013408
CP: 67331.7
VIZ: 3147678

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
I personally believe that any business should be able to deny business to whomever they wish.  It is, after all, their business.  If they want to risk losing some of their paycheck by saying that certain people can't participate in it, then who's to judge?  I don't want the government to tell me how to run my house...why should it be much different with my business.

(Now before anyone starts shouting, I'm talking about REASONABLE and LEGAL things.)

As long as their decisions don't physically hurt anyone or break any laws, I'd say it was the business owner's right.
I personally believe that any business should be able to deny business to whomever they wish.  It is, after all, their business.  If they want to risk losing some of their paycheck by saying that certain people can't participate in it, then who's to judge?  I don't want the government to tell me how to run my house...why should it be much different with my business.

(Now before anyone starts shouting, I'm talking about REASONABLE and LEGAL things.)

As long as their decisions don't physically hurt anyone or break any laws, I'd say it was the business owner's right.
Vizzed Elite
Singelli


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 08-09-12
Location: Alabama
Last Post: 2521 days
Last Active: 2496 days

Links

Page Comments


This page has no comments

Adblocker detected!

Vizzed.com is very expensive to keep alive! The Ads pay for the servers.

Vizzed has 3 TB worth of games and 1 TB worth of music.  This site is free to use but the ads barely pay for the monthly server fees.  If too many more people use ad block, the site cannot survive.

We prioritize the community over the site profits.  This is why we avoid using annoying (but high paying) ads like most other sites which include popups, obnoxious sounds and animations, malware, and other forms of intrusiveness.  We'll do our part to never resort to these types of ads, please do your part by helping support this site by adding Vizzed.com to your ad blocking whitelist.

×