Remove Ad, Sign Up
Register to Remove Ad
Register to Remove Ad
Remove Ad, Sign Up
Register to Remove Ad
Register to Remove Ad
Register
☷ Vizzed.com Play Retro Games Vizzed Board Video Games Game Music Market Minecraft Radio Widgets Virtual Bible
☷ Register   Login  
New Posts All Threads Your Threads Contribution Points News and Updates Active Users User Ranks Post Search Online Users
About   Users   Help
Users & Guests Online
On Page: 1
Directory: 256
Entire Site: 5 & 1438
Page Admin: supercool22, Page Staff: tgags123, pokemon x, tgags123, SonicOlmstead, Barathemos, Furret, geeogree,
09-27-26 09:25 PM

Forum Links

Related Threads
Coming Soon

Thread Information

Views
6,017
Replies
26
Rating
0
Status
CLOSED
Thread
Creator
Oldschool41
07-12-13 05:33 PM
Last
Post
zanderlex
01-07-14 11:04 AM
Additional Thread Details
Views: 2,010
Today: 0
Users: 0 unique

Thread Actions

Thread Closed
New Thread
New Poll
Order
Posts


2 Pages
>>
 

Iowa Woman Fired for being too Attractive

 

07-12-13 05:33 PM
Oldschool41 is Offline
Link
| ID: 843838 | 257 Words

Oldschool41
Level: 85

POSTS: 1595/1799
POST EXP: 163693
LVL EXP: 5818194
CP: 989.0
VIZ: 18214

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0

Good day folks.

I heard this story on a TV show about an Iowa dental assistant who was fired by her boss because she was considered "too attractive" and that her attractiveness "threatened his marriage." I waited to make a thread about this topic as it was only a trial court ruling.

But recently the Iowa Supreme Court ruled that employers can fire workers for being "too attractive" if the believe the attractiveness will result in problems with the marriage. The Iowa court said that this isn't Sex discrimination as the firing is based off of "feelings" rather then gender. Here is the funny thing...

The woman who is suing her boss says that she wasn't having an affair with her boss and the boss semi-confirmed it. Even thou the boss did make some rather suggestive text messages (such as asking the co-worker how often she has an orgasm), complained that the woman's outfit was so revealing that it distracted him from work, and treated her better then other employees. After the boss' wife found out about the text messages, the boss fired her to "protect his marriage."

So what do you guys think of this? Here are some questions...

1. Is this Sex discrimination or not?

2. Does it seem like the Boss was just trying to cover up his flirting or did he really care about his marriage?

3. Is firing someone because they are Attractive a valid reason for termination?

4. Will this be a case for the Supreme Court of the United States?


Good day folks.

I heard this story on a TV show about an Iowa dental assistant who was fired by her boss because she was considered "too attractive" and that her attractiveness "threatened his marriage." I waited to make a thread about this topic as it was only a trial court ruling.

But recently the Iowa Supreme Court ruled that employers can fire workers for being "too attractive" if the believe the attractiveness will result in problems with the marriage. The Iowa court said that this isn't Sex discrimination as the firing is based off of "feelings" rather then gender. Here is the funny thing...

The woman who is suing her boss says that she wasn't having an affair with her boss and the boss semi-confirmed it. Even thou the boss did make some rather suggestive text messages (such as asking the co-worker how often she has an orgasm), complained that the woman's outfit was so revealing that it distracted him from work, and treated her better then other employees. After the boss' wife found out about the text messages, the boss fired her to "protect his marriage."

So what do you guys think of this? Here are some questions...

1. Is this Sex discrimination or not?

2. Does it seem like the Boss was just trying to cover up his flirting or did he really care about his marriage?

3. Is firing someone because they are Attractive a valid reason for termination?

4. Will this be a case for the Supreme Court of the United States?



--------------------
Trusted Member
A wise man speaks because he has something to say. A fool speaks because he has to say something.


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 10-27-10
Last Post: 3687 days
Last Active: 3247 days

(edited by Oldschool41 on 07-12-13 05:34 PM)    

07-12-13 05:54 PM
thing1 is Offline
Link
| ID: 843881 | 158 Words

thing1
Thingywingy
Level: 225


POSTS: 6948/17401
POST EXP: 936870
LVL EXP: 173531834
CP: 32488.1
VIZ: 343820

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
1. Is this Sex discrimination or not?
You know, as messed up as it is, it is not exactly sex discrimination. You can fire a guy for being too attractive too, if the situation were reversed. 
2. Does it seem like the Boss was just trying to cover up his flirting or did he really care about his marriage?
I think he was trying to cover it up. But... since the whole thing is on the news... it's not exactly covered up any more, is it? XD
3. Is firing someone because they are Attractive a valid reason for termination?
No, it is not. I would think it would just draw in more business, not harm the business. 
4. Will this be a case for the Supreme Court of the United States?
I think they will try to go to the United States Supreme Court, but I do not think that the Supreme Court will rule on it. 
1. Is this Sex discrimination or not?
You know, as messed up as it is, it is not exactly sex discrimination. You can fire a guy for being too attractive too, if the situation were reversed. 
2. Does it seem like the Boss was just trying to cover up his flirting or did he really care about his marriage?
I think he was trying to cover it up. But... since the whole thing is on the news... it's not exactly covered up any more, is it? XD
3. Is firing someone because they are Attractive a valid reason for termination?
No, it is not. I would think it would just draw in more business, not harm the business. 
4. Will this be a case for the Supreme Court of the United States?
I think they will try to go to the United States Supreme Court, but I do not think that the Supreme Court will rule on it. 

____________________
Vizzed Elite
What is life?


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 02-03-11
Location: Washington DC Area
Last Post: 154 days
Last Active: 12 hours

07-15-13 06:40 AM
warmaker is Offline
Link
| ID: 846604 | 144 Words

warmaker
Level: 93

POSTS: 1003/2198
POST EXP: 240742
LVL EXP: 7976705
CP: 4970.6
VIZ: 198536

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
It would be sex discrimination if he had no females on his staff or fired every female he hired within a short time.  Just because she's a female and he's a male doesn't make it discrimination.

I don't know his strategy but when he fired her he gave the why to avoid conflict.  Or he's creating buzz and marketing like we're talking about it right now.  Who knows what other people think?

Employment is generally 'at-will employment' which means either party, employer or employee can terminate a job for any reason or no reason.  There is nothing wrong with firing someone because they cause a distraction and are interfering with the job.  It is well within the rights of any employer to terminate someone's job.

No.  This is not important enough to go the Supreme Court.  There have been other instances of this happening.
It would be sex discrimination if he had no females on his staff or fired every female he hired within a short time.  Just because she's a female and he's a male doesn't make it discrimination.

I don't know his strategy but when he fired her he gave the why to avoid conflict.  Or he's creating buzz and marketing like we're talking about it right now.  Who knows what other people think?

Employment is generally 'at-will employment' which means either party, employer or employee can terminate a job for any reason or no reason.  There is nothing wrong with firing someone because they cause a distraction and are interfering with the job.  It is well within the rights of any employer to terminate someone's job.

No.  This is not important enough to go the Supreme Court.  There have been other instances of this happening.

--------------------
Trusted Member

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 05-02-10
Location: Honolulu, HI
Last Post: 4087 days
Last Active: 3751 days

07-15-13 06:42 AM
UFC is Offline
Link
| ID: 846606 | 46 Words

UFC
Level: 68


POSTS: 69/1083
POST EXP: 41424
LVL EXP: 2638272
CP: 4797.4
VIZ: 5583

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
This is a weird one, maybe the boss didn't want to get himself in big trouble from being too attracted to said employee either way it's a bad decision anyways and he should not have hired in the first place if this was the end game
This is a weird one, maybe the boss didn't want to get himself in big trouble from being too attracted to said employee either way it's a bad decision anyways and he should not have hired in the first place if this was the end game

--------------------
Perma Banned
Heil Satan


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 09-27-11
Last Post: 4458 days
Last Active: 4457 days

07-15-13 08:15 PM
MegaRevolution1 is Offline
Link
| ID: 847358 | 154 Words

Level: 123


POSTS: 4147/4170
POST EXP: 274021
LVL EXP: 20974820
CP: 2186.9
VIZ: 33943

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
Yeah, I don't think you can truly call it "discrimination" in this case, but it's certainly something... Personally, I don't think it truly counts as "sexual discrimination" unless he has done this several times before, or any other different scenario occurs.

He definitely wasn't trying to cover up the flirting at all. It truly just seems like he was trying to protect his marriage. While there definitely were better ways to protect his marriage, it does seem justifiable by law.

I think it's a bit of a complicated case when you want to consider it "justifiable", so I'll just agree with the law in this case and say that, due to the recent ruling, it was fair.

"But recently the Iowa Supreme Court ruled that employers can fire workers for being "too attractive" if the believe the attractiveness will result in problems with the marriage." - Doesn't this mean it already was a case?
Yeah, I don't think you can truly call it "discrimination" in this case, but it's certainly something... Personally, I don't think it truly counts as "sexual discrimination" unless he has done this several times before, or any other different scenario occurs.

He definitely wasn't trying to cover up the flirting at all. It truly just seems like he was trying to protect his marriage. While there definitely were better ways to protect his marriage, it does seem justifiable by law.

I think it's a bit of a complicated case when you want to consider it "justifiable", so I'll just agree with the law in this case and say that, due to the recent ruling, it was fair.

"But recently the Iowa Supreme Court ruled that employers can fire workers for being "too attractive" if the believe the attractiveness will result in problems with the marriage." - Doesn't this mean it already was a case?
Vizzed Elite
I asked for it. This is what I wanted.


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 02-16-10
Last Post: 4821 days
Last Active: 4811 days

07-15-13 08:54 PM
Oldschool41 is Offline
Link
| ID: 847399 | 17 Words

Oldschool41
Level: 85

POSTS: 1601/1799
POST EXP: 163693
LVL EXP: 5818194
CP: 989.0
VIZ: 18214

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0

MegaRevolution1 : Oh no I mean going to the United States Supreme Court, not the Iowa Supreme Court.

MegaRevolution1 : Oh no I mean going to the United States Supreme Court, not the Iowa Supreme Court.


--------------------
Trusted Member
A wise man speaks because he has something to say. A fool speaks because he has to say something.


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 10-27-10
Last Post: 3687 days
Last Active: 3247 days

07-17-13 12:21 PM
thenumberone is Offline
Link
| ID: 849003 | 197 Words

thenumberone
Level: 146


POSTS: 5497/6365
POST EXP: 365694
LVL EXP: 38231857
CP: 4959.9
VIZ: 331106

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
It is discrimination. When you select people or fire them for reasons other than their ability to do the job that is discrimination. If you hired only woman that would also be discrimination, even if they attracted a ton of male customers, because you are being unfair in your selection, the males could potentially do a better job, but you want your staff to look beautiful.
That guy is a complete *sshole for firing her, and I would totally take it all the way for unfair dismissal. If she was late, had poor hygiene or scruffy uniform, a bad attitude, anything relevant to the job, it could be grounds for firing. But being the opposite gender? If i was only attracted to black people and fired a black person because i was afraid of jepordising my marriage, even though its not really racism, it is clearly wrong and pretty borderline because for all intents and purposes, im firing them over their race. To all intents and purposes, this woman was fired for her gender.
If that guy doesent have enough commitment to stay faithful, that's his fault.

Random similar article btw, except a guy this time:
http://metro.co.uk/2013/05/08/too-handsome-guy-kicked-out-of-saudi-arabia-could-be-too-sexy-for-facebook-after-fan-page-removed-3733295/
It is discrimination. When you select people or fire them for reasons other than their ability to do the job that is discrimination. If you hired only woman that would also be discrimination, even if they attracted a ton of male customers, because you are being unfair in your selection, the males could potentially do a better job, but you want your staff to look beautiful.
That guy is a complete *sshole for firing her, and I would totally take it all the way for unfair dismissal. If she was late, had poor hygiene or scruffy uniform, a bad attitude, anything relevant to the job, it could be grounds for firing. But being the opposite gender? If i was only attracted to black people and fired a black person because i was afraid of jepordising my marriage, even though its not really racism, it is clearly wrong and pretty borderline because for all intents and purposes, im firing them over their race. To all intents and purposes, this woman was fired for her gender.
If that guy doesent have enough commitment to stay faithful, that's his fault.

Random similar article btw, except a guy this time:
http://metro.co.uk/2013/05/08/too-handsome-guy-kicked-out-of-saudi-arabia-could-be-too-sexy-for-facebook-after-fan-page-removed-3733295/

Bleeding Heart Liberal
Vizzed Elite
Bleeding Heart Liberal


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 03-22-11
Last Post: 4295 days
Last Active: 4295 days

(edited by thenumberone on 07-17-13 12:22 PM)    

07-19-13 06:51 AM
Light Knight is Offline
Link
| ID: 850585 | 151 Words

Light Knight
Davideo3.14
Level: 123


POSTS: 1632/3824
POST EXP: 276527
LVL EXP: 21102200
CP: 11382.7
VIZ: 1059119

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
You are firing someone who is completely normal because of their physical appearance, that is coming very close to discrimination.  It's not quite, as discrimination is defined as treating people of a specific group worst than others. Now we could say "attractive" is the group his is discriminating against, but then we are assuming. It could have been this ONE woman only who ever made him feel this way, and nothing to do with "attractive" people in general.

Regardless, I think it's still wrong. I guess we will need to find a new word to describe this; there probably already exists one, but I can't think of it.

Imagine he fired a woman because she was ugly. That would never have stood, it would have been an uproar. Why is it not the case with the opposite? Because people don't feel as bad for a pretty girl as an ugly one?

You are firing someone who is completely normal because of their physical appearance, that is coming very close to discrimination.  It's not quite, as discrimination is defined as treating people of a specific group worst than others. Now we could say "attractive" is the group his is discriminating against, but then we are assuming. It could have been this ONE woman only who ever made him feel this way, and nothing to do with "attractive" people in general.

Regardless, I think it's still wrong. I guess we will need to find a new word to describe this; there probably already exists one, but I can't think of it.

Imagine he fired a woman because she was ugly. That would never have stood, it would have been an uproar. Why is it not the case with the opposite? Because people don't feel as bad for a pretty girl as an ugly one?

--------------------
 "I AM ERROR."  
Vizzed Elite
Former Admin
Loyal Knight of Vizzed


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 12-08-04
Location: The Internet
Last Post: 248 days
Last Active: 170 days

07-19-13 09:28 AM
malkin77 is Offline
Link
| ID: 850652 | 33 Words

malkin77
Level: 43


POSTS: 209/390
POST EXP: 18051
LVL EXP: 535035
CP: 385.8
VIZ: 5141

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
This is quite sexist and something should be done, if you feel another women is threatening your marriage in the first place. Your marriage isn't very strong at all. Men 0 : Women 1
This is quite sexist and something should be done, if you feel another women is threatening your marriage in the first place. Your marriage isn't very strong at all. Men 0 : Women 1

--------------------
Layout Made By: Divine Aurora
Member

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 07-12-13
Location: Michigan
Last Post: 3696 days
Last Active: 3696 days

07-25-13 12:05 PM
Uzar is Offline
Link
| ID: 854018 | 183 Words

Uzar
A user of this
Level: 144


POSTS: 91/6433
POST EXP: 345123
LVL EXP: 35985943
CP: 26032.8
VIZ: 561383

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
Iowa, my home state, I am disappoint. With that being said; 1. Is this Sex discrimination or not? Yes, yes it is. All because some creepy guy sends dirty texts and flirts with her, he fires her for not responding, and because he can't learn any self-control. Or so it seems.
2. Does it seem like the Boss was just trying to cover up his flirting or did he really care about his marriage? There is a possibility that the answer to this question is a little bit of both, maybe he felt bad about what he did and really did love his wife, but didn't want word of what he's done to get out. It isn't always only one or the other.
3. Is firing someone because they are Attractive a valid reason for termination?  No, nobody should lose their job because someone else thinks about them too much. 
4. Will this be a case for the Supreme Court of the United States? I don't think so, this doesn't seem all that worthy of the United State's Highest court and national attention.
Iowa, my home state, I am disappoint. With that being said; 1. Is this Sex discrimination or not? Yes, yes it is. All because some creepy guy sends dirty texts and flirts with her, he fires her for not responding, and because he can't learn any self-control. Or so it seems.
2. Does it seem like the Boss was just trying to cover up his flirting or did he really care about his marriage? There is a possibility that the answer to this question is a little bit of both, maybe he felt bad about what he did and really did love his wife, but didn't want word of what he's done to get out. It isn't always only one or the other.
3. Is firing someone because they are Attractive a valid reason for termination?  No, nobody should lose their job because someone else thinks about them too much. 
4. Will this be a case for the Supreme Court of the United States? I don't think so, this doesn't seem all that worthy of the United State's Highest court and national attention.


--------------------
Vizzed Elite
I wonder what the character limit on this thing is.


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 06-03-13
Location: Airship Bostonius
Last Post: 2791 days
Last Active: 2762 days

07-25-13 05:22 PM
Sword Legion is Offline
Link
| ID: 854185 | 123 Words

Sword Legion
Sword legion
Sword egion
Level: 105


POSTS: 428/3034
POST EXP: 699562
LVL EXP: 11950380
CP: 16239.6
VIZ: 148890

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
Oldschool41 :

I think that you as the owner of your buisiness should be able to fire anyone for any reason.

Why?

Just because you own the business.
I realize that this could lead to discrimination, which I disagree with.
But if we take antidiscrimination laws to far, then we might do something like say, force gay people to
eat at Chick ful A.

People refusing buisiness services or jobs to other individuals is just another 
way that they are allowed to protest.

If I was having trouble with someone,like that boss was, then I would probably fire her. . .
but I would make it happen on the best terms that I could, and help her get a job elswhere if
I could.
Oldschool41 :

I think that you as the owner of your buisiness should be able to fire anyone for any reason.

Why?

Just because you own the business.
I realize that this could lead to discrimination, which I disagree with.
But if we take antidiscrimination laws to far, then we might do something like say, force gay people to
eat at Chick ful A.

People refusing buisiness services or jobs to other individuals is just another 
way that they are allowed to protest.

If I was having trouble with someone,like that boss was, then I would probably fire her. . .
but I would make it happen on the best terms that I could, and help her get a job elswhere if
I could.

--------------------
Trusted Member
Dark knight of the blackened sun. I am Sword Legion, one of many. My mask is thick, and my armor is strong. All the more necessary in a world such as this. . .


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 09-27-12
Location: Faxanadu
Last Post: 1902 days
Last Active: 837 days

07-28-13 08:25 PM
goodboy is Offline
Link
| ID: 856594 | 128 Words

goodboy
¯_(?)_/¯
Level: 89


POSTS: 270/2102
POST EXP: 124962
LVL EXP: 6726018
CP: 2862.6
VIZ: 125200

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
I heard about this...

1. Well, I guess not. It could be a male in the position. It depends if the boss treated the employee right or not. If not, it's sex discrimination, otherwise, he's serious and thinks his wife is uglier.

2. Like I said, it depends how he treated her. Did he abuse her and yell at her a lot? Or did he act all nice and flirty in the past? The past is the key to the case, really.

3. Honestly, no. If they're "attractive," they would, theoretically, raise business. It's retarded how people would fire for being attractive. It's stupid, and while he has all authority to do that, it's just stupid. 

4. Pretty sure the lower courts are reasonable enough to handle this.
I heard about this...

1. Well, I guess not. It could be a male in the position. It depends if the boss treated the employee right or not. If not, it's sex discrimination, otherwise, he's serious and thinks his wife is uglier.

2. Like I said, it depends how he treated her. Did he abuse her and yell at her a lot? Or did he act all nice and flirty in the past? The past is the key to the case, really.

3. Honestly, no. If they're "attractive," they would, theoretically, raise business. It's retarded how people would fire for being attractive. It's stupid, and while he has all authority to do that, it's just stupid. 

4. Pretty sure the lower courts are reasonable enough to handle this.


--------------------
Grovyle Layout made by TornadoMudkip


Trusted Member

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 05-27-13
Location: Your backyard.
Last Post: 3501 days
Last Active: 3422 days

07-28-13 08:25 PM
TreasurePlanet23 is Offline
Link
| ID: 856595 | 65 Words

Level: 51


POSTS: 234/570
POST EXP: 33759
LVL EXP: 949501
CP: 1519.8
VIZ: 4733

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
What the heck? What has this world come to? You can't fire someone for being too attractive. That's just outrageous. The only reason I would fire someone from being too attractive is if the woman is doing sexual acts while on the job. Heh, job, yea, you know where that was going. ANYWAY, I really think that this is a dumb reason for firing someone.
What the heck? What has this world come to? You can't fire someone for being too attractive. That's just outrageous. The only reason I would fire someone from being too attractive is if the woman is doing sexual acts while on the job. Heh, job, yea, you know where that was going. ANYWAY, I really think that this is a dumb reason for firing someone.

--------------------
Member
Basketball Rat


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 05-30-13
Last Post: 4333 days
Last Active: 1651 days

07-28-13 08:33 PM
rcarter2 is Offline
Link
| ID: 856605 | 75 Words

rcarter2
Level: 165


POSTS: 6614/8463
POST EXP: 758515
LVL EXP: 58406784
CP: 33763.5
VIZ: 1691093

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
TreasurePlanet23 : I would hope that you wouldn't fire someone who is doing sexual acts on the job for being too attractive. You should fire them purely on the fact that they are doing sex acts on the job   So if they were a very unattractive person doing sex acts on the job, would you fire them for being too unattractive? I kid, of course. The way you worded that just came out wrong. lol.





TreasurePlanet23 : I would hope that you wouldn't fire someone who is doing sexual acts on the job for being too attractive. You should fire them purely on the fact that they are doing sex acts on the job   So if they were a very unattractive person doing sex acts on the job, would you fire them for being too unattractive? I kid, of course. The way you worded that just came out wrong. lol.

--------------------
This is rcarter2's Post!


Layouts by Pacman


Vizzed Elite
Dominating RGR Competition Hall of Fame Table!


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 05-01-11
Location: Kansas
Last Post: 3352 days
Last Active: 647 days

07-28-13 08:36 PM
TreasurePlanet23 is Offline
Link
| ID: 856611 | 57 Words

Level: 51


POSTS: 238/570
POST EXP: 33759
LVL EXP: 949501
CP: 1519.8
VIZ: 4733

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
rcarter2 : Yes, I did, thank you for catching that lol! But, maybe she was doing sexual acts, and they just tried to cover it up by saying she was too attractive? I don't really know, just throwing that out there. This is just so stupid, that I'm not even going to waste my energy on this topic.
rcarter2 : Yes, I did, thank you for catching that lol! But, maybe she was doing sexual acts, and they just tried to cover it up by saying she was too attractive? I don't really know, just throwing that out there. This is just so stupid, that I'm not even going to waste my energy on this topic.

--------------------
Member
Basketball Rat


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 05-30-13
Last Post: 4333 days
Last Active: 1651 days

08-03-13 05:45 PM
xandermartin98 is Offline
Link
| ID: 860859 | 9 Words

xandermartin98
Level: 33


POSTS: 118/210
POST EXP: 17806
LVL EXP: 212396
CP: 231.8
VIZ: 6221

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
She got fired for being too attractive!? xD http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HuDUnKPyzww
She got fired for being too attractive!? xD http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HuDUnKPyzww

--------------------
Made by pokemon x
Member
Geeky Outcast Dan


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 05-27-13
Location: Riverton, New Jersey
Last Post: 4483 days
Last Active: 4238 days

10-05-13 05:27 PM
bobq is Offline
Link
| ID: 898512 | 18 Words

bobq
Level: 68


POSTS: 568/1094
POST EXP: 89400
LVL EXP: 2638531
CP: 4035.9
VIZ: 117385

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
My mind immediately went to Dodgeball, where Ben Stiller fires the chick so that he can date her.
My mind immediately went to Dodgeball, where Ben Stiller fires the chick so that he can date her.

--------------------
Gangster penguins
Trusted Member

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 03-07-12
Last Post: 3100 days
Last Active: 2817 days

10-05-13 07:01 PM
Oldschool41 is Offline
Link
| ID: 898613 | 10 Words

Oldschool41
Level: 85

POSTS: 1713/1799
POST EXP: 163693
LVL EXP: 5818194
CP: 989.0
VIZ: 18214

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0

bobq : Ironic because I was just got done watching Dodgeball.

bobq : Ironic because I was just got done watching Dodgeball.


--------------------
Trusted Member
A wise man speaks because he has something to say. A fool speaks because he has to say something.


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 10-27-10
Last Post: 3687 days
Last Active: 3247 days

10-05-13 07:39 PM
bobq is Offline
Link
| ID: 898670 | 7 Words

bobq
Level: 68


POSTS: 569/1094
POST EXP: 89400
LVL EXP: 2638531
CP: 4035.9
VIZ: 117385

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
Funny how things like that happen sometimes.
Funny how things like that happen sometimes.

--------------------
Gangster penguins
Trusted Member

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 03-07-12
Last Post: 3100 days
Last Active: 2817 days

10-05-13 07:49 PM
SacredShadow is Offline
Link
| ID: 898679 | 133 Words

SacredShadow
Razor-987
Level: 165


POSTS: 3116/8804
POST EXP: 1057215
LVL EXP: 58437859
CP: 42310.6
VIZ: 1691250

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
I think this is completely ridiculous the way this happened, I mean come on, being fired for being too attractive?

That is silly, and this world has come to this and it is pretty weird. This is just a strange topic, it is one thing if it is sexual discrimination, and another if he abused her and mistreated her. But either way this is a weird topic and I think this is just ridiculous. I though the world was already pretty screwed up, and this just clearly exemplifies my point. Thank you for sharing such a weird topic XD. Guess they are just going to have to live with hiring ugly employees.

I have never seen an article or topic that is as strange as this one. But that is just my opinion. 
I think this is completely ridiculous the way this happened, I mean come on, being fired for being too attractive?

That is silly, and this world has come to this and it is pretty weird. This is just a strange topic, it is one thing if it is sexual discrimination, and another if he abused her and mistreated her. But either way this is a weird topic and I think this is just ridiculous. I though the world was already pretty screwed up, and this just clearly exemplifies my point. Thank you for sharing such a weird topic XD. Guess they are just going to have to live with hiring ugly employees.

I have never seen an article or topic that is as strange as this one. But that is just my opinion. 

--------------------
Made By Barathemos
Vizzed Elite

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 01-14-13
Last Post: 81 days
Last Active: 66 days

Links

Page Comments

Dove4JS - 12-12-20 05:26 AM
no image
joldboy70 - 07-10-20 11:13 AM
test
joldboy70 - 07-10-20 11:12 AM
test
savage23157 - 04-08-20 01:33 PM
Hi im new vizzed
zokuza - 11-18-19 09:08 AM
final got playstaion games unlock yes baby digimon world here i com
yoshirulez! - 02-10-17 08:45 PM
MAY MAYS
yoshirulez! - 02-10-17 08:45 PM
maymays
yoshirulez! - 02-07-17 11:13 PM
OwO what's this?
yoshirulez! - 02-07-17 11:13 PM
OwO what's this?
yoshirulez! - 02-07-17 11:13 PM
OwO what's this?

Adblocker detected!

Vizzed.com is very expensive to keep alive! The Ads pay for the servers.

Vizzed has 3 TB worth of games and 1 TB worth of music.  This site is free to use but the ads barely pay for the monthly server fees.  If too many more people use ad block, the site cannot survive.

We prioritize the community over the site profits.  This is why we avoid using annoying (but high paying) ads like most other sites which include popups, obnoxious sounds and animations, malware, and other forms of intrusiveness.  We'll do our part to never resort to these types of ads, please do your part by helping support this site by adding Vizzed.com to your ad blocking whitelist.

×