I tend to like all movies, and that's true for this one as well. I did like it even though it seemed as though they were just repeating the same thing over, which is exactly what they were doing really. I liked the first movie, and I liked the trailer for this one though I grew tired of it after having seen it so many times but in the end I decided to see it with my friends a few days after it came out. We all thought that it was very funny and had a few good moments but it could have used a lot of work to make it better because most of the movie had seemed to drag on but overall it was a good movie.

The movie is about the same thing that the first thing is about, security. However this time it's about keeping a Las Vegas hotel safe and aside for messing up at almost every single opportunity, that's what Blart does. Minus the crashing into everything. Sometimes comedy is supposed to be stupid, but I think this movie took stupid to a whole new level with half of the movie being based on luck and clumsiness.

I always love when there's a movie that has a good cast, however with this one I had no idea who anybody was aside for Kevin James, and I think he did a pretty good job with his role because for the most part he was funny. The only other person I recognized was David Henrie from his days with Disney, and I think that if the movie had at least one or two other actors who were more know, it could have been just a bit better.

Overall it was a very funny movie but could have used some work, I wouldn't really recommend seeing it in theaters though.

Yeah, there's no way I'd even consider watching this movie in the theaters. I honestly don't know if I'd even watch it when it comes to redbox. I'm leaning towards no on this movie.

I feel like most of the elements in this sequel installment are ones that are used by Disney a lot.

Oh god words cannot describe my loathing for Disney movies.
Absolutely horrid watching experiences. Oh and how about those great family friendly sitcoms hmm? Dog with a Blog? GAG ME.

It did seem overly stupid. I gave it a 5/10 which was probably 1-2 points generous because I felt the first was sooo much better. Plot-wise, execution wise, ughh.

The first thing I thought when I saw they were making a sequel to this movie was, "Why?" I mean did that many people love the first movie so much that there needed to be a sequel?

I'm pretty selective of the movies I go to the theater to see these days, and this doesn't make the cut.

The only way I'll probably watch it is if it's on one of the movie channels on Satellite sometime and I have nothing else to do and totally bored lol

Can we really consider Paul Blart 2 to be considered cannon in the Blartverse? I mean, a big point in the first movie was that one girl and Blart had true love. Maybe this is a satire of the franchise? Or maybe this is a dream Blart had while passed out from his hypoglycemia.

Anyway, Paul Blaul Mall Call 2 is an okay movie. It's just a Sandler movie. So story, characterization, and dialogue were all thrown in the incinerator at the beginning of production. Because all we needed for Pallout 4 was for Paul to fall over for 2 hours and call that a film.

Why did this movie even exist? I remember watching some of the first movie on television six years ago and I don't remember a single thing about it. I'd understand a lazy comedy sequel if there was at least a lot of box office cash to bank on like The Hangover, but was Pap Blap Map Slap ever popular?

I get that it's just another check for Happy Madison but I cannot fathom for the life of my why it had to be Paul Blart 2.