This game is stupid.  Let's start with the control.  A is a forward jump, not a straight up jump.  And B shoots slime.  Kinda makes sense, because proton packs shooting lasers would be very overpowered. Start lays a ghost trap.  Also, one-hit deaths, with just three lives.  You do get 3 continues, but as you would expect, continues send you back to the beginning of the level.  
You'd think select would pause, but it doesn't! There's no way to pause! Imagine the player hitting select to pause so he can go to the bathroom or answer a phone call, only to hear pain sounds and realize he's getting his butt kicked! Also, a small bug can kill you! That's right! All a bug has to do to kick your butt is to touch you in the foot!
Then there's the gun aiming.  You have to Sloooooooooowly turn your arm around just to aim. Also the enemy placement is just stupid! The story is the same as in the movie.  I've heard there's only a few levels, but I can't even get past the first level! This is because of The dang crushers! I like the music, though.  
Anyway, I play my games on the retro game room, and not the actual console.  Back to the review.  The graphics are just as bad as Action 52.   Finally, this game could have also gotten some better use of ghostbuster characters.  What problem do they have with Winston? Final Verdict, this game gets a 3.1 out of 10! Not only are the controls and graphics bad, But I can't even get past the first stinking level! Overall, This game is a pile of dodo, and I would recommend staying away from this game.  If I had a choice between playing this game and having my eyes poked out so hard that not even a sight aid would help because my sight would be nonexistent, I would play this game.  Is came 0.0000000000001% close, though.

Dialgaofpower : errr ok review. But in proper reviews you should space out what you're saying and very setence. So that way it can be easy to pass through. and try talking about the categories given to you at the top of the page and break them down with great depth. Because not to be mean or anything It feels like you're kind of rushing these reviews. I'll rate this a 2 out of 5.edit this review and I'll change my rating

SuperCrash64 : Rating? What the heck?

And I don't see what you're talking about, it meets all the requirements.

zelda2 : I'm trying to give him tips on helping him in future reviews. and fyi you can rate reviews if you want.

SuperCrash64 : I don't categorize stuff.  I break things down AVGN style.

I like the passion that you have, since bad games should make us mad for playing them, but you need to talk about other parts of the game as well and to give credit where credit's due. You went on a rant to talk about how bad the controls and how certain things about the game that you didn't like, but then all you said about story, sound, and graphics was "same as the movie", "I like the music", and "as bad as Action 52" respectively. You gave sound a 8. There has to be more stuff you can talk about that. I think you need to expand on the rest of the game and not just rant on one part and not only say how you feel, but also explain why you feel that way about the game. Basically, the detail on your rant in game control should also be apparent in other parts of the game.

zelda2 : The rating review feature is actually at the game page itself, where you can rate reviews based on how well they are written.

Dialgaofpower : Yeah, but AVGN really isn't good at making genuine reviews. He just rants and tries to be funny. Sure, it made him popular, but his rants are not reviews. I would suggest trying to come up with your own style of making reviews rather than 'breaking it down ANYONE style'.

Yea dude this is a very well written review. Sure, it doesn't meet the requirements, but that being said it is still another style of a review. It doesn't matter what the others say. Being that I am familiar with the Angry Video Game Nerd's work, I like this review a lot. Your really pulled out what is bad about this game. This game was bad to start with so you just had to say what bad things the game had and you did that very well. Keep making these reviews and eventually it will be another style of review that other will eventually switch too instead of these organized reviews.

MordecooLol23 : Actually, this does meet review requirements. It qualifies as a review by all rules, the others were just trying to give pointers on one good way to write reviews, though there is no wrong way to write them, so long as they follow the rules (and he did). All featured reviews are broken down that way, but he never said he was looking to be featured, in which case, you are correct.

Eirinn : You are totally right. I am sorry for letting you down. You should probably ban me now because I am causing controversy. I am very sorry.

MordecooLol23 : I do believe I sense sarcasm. :p Lol Actually, I was defending your view, and his review (much like you did), so I'm not sure why you are replying like that.