Yea, apparently the new Expendables movie will have the same guys from the last one along with Jeane Claude Van Damn and Chuck Norris. Here's the kicker, the only way for Chuck Norris to star in this movies, kick the rating down from R to PG13. NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!! Let's hear your opinions on this, should it stay R without Norris or bump it down to PG13 with Norris. If you never seen The Expendables, its the ultimate man flick, filled with guns, 'splosions, fighting, and laced with testosterone.

Eh, I honestly couldn't care any less with it. Although, I have never even seen the expendables. I typically don't like those "ultimate man flicks". Usually, they are just way to concerned about the guns, explosions, fighting, and overdose of testosterone. I like a good action film as much as the next guy, but if they expect those things to be what makes the movie good, count me out. I need more substance. Anyway, what are they really going to do by changing it to PG-13? Make it a little less gory? Don't drop the F bomb every 10 seconds? A PG-13 action film can be just as good as an R rated action film. Before you think I am just against rated R content, that is far from the truth. But when it gets to the point where it really doesn't fit because it is just overused, that's when it is just annoying. If Chuck Norris doesn't want to be in a movie with that kind of stuff, he is free to choose so. If the Rated R content is that important to the makers of the movie, then they can due without him. 

rcarter2 : I see where your commin' from and I respect that. I like an over the top action movie better than a horror movie any day, but that's my preference.