Remove Ad, Sign Up
Register to Remove Ad
Register to Remove Ad
Remove Ad, Sign Up
Register to Remove Ad
Register to Remove Ad
Signup for Free!
-More Features-
-Far Less Ads-
About   Users   Help
Users & Guests Online
On Page: 1
Directory: 1 & 152
Entire Site: 6 & 806
Page Staff: pennylessz, pokemon x, Barathemos, tgags123, alexanyways, RavusRat,
03-28-24 06:19 AM

Forum Links

Electoral System vs. Direct Popular Vote
Mostly oriented around the US presidential election system, but anyone feel free to comment.
Related Threads
Coming Soon

Thread Information

Views
1,879
Replies
18
Rating
0
Status
CLOSED
Thread
Creator
septembern
11-07-11 10:50 PM
Last
Post
Elara
11-20-11 07:16 PM
Additional Thread Details
Views: 386
Today: 0
Users: 0 unique

Thread Actions

Thread Closed
New Thread
New Poll
Order
 

Electoral System vs. Direct Popular Vote

 

11-07-11 10:50 PM
septembern is Offline
| ID: 493586 | 127 Words

septembern
Level: 202


POSTS: 11949/13800
POST EXP: 413008
LVL EXP: 117198184
CP: 3802.9
VIZ: 230180

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
Well, if you live in the United States, then you probably should know that our president is elected, not on the votes of the people, but on the members of the electoral college.

Do you like this system/think that it is better, or would you rather have a direct popular vote?

Really this is pretty two-sided, so I'll pop in now and again and post a few points for the opposite side to spice things up if the answers are all leaning to one side.

If you do not know much about the electoral college a few helpful links:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electoral_College_(United_States)
http://www.nationalpopularvote.com/

just to get a decent understanding of both sides...

This is more US, but anyone can opine, I'm curious as to see how this will progress.
Well, if you live in the United States, then you probably should know that our president is elected, not on the votes of the people, but on the members of the electoral college.

Do you like this system/think that it is better, or would you rather have a direct popular vote?

Really this is pretty two-sided, so I'll pop in now and again and post a few points for the opposite side to spice things up if the answers are all leaning to one side.

If you do not know much about the electoral college a few helpful links:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electoral_College_(United_States)
http://www.nationalpopularvote.com/

just to get a decent understanding of both sides...

This is more US, but anyone can opine, I'm curious as to see how this will progress.
Vizzed Elite
Winner of the April 2012 Tour de Vizzed


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 12-05-09
Last Post: 4306 days
Last Active: 3693 days

11-08-11 11:10 AM
Hoochman is Offline
| ID: 493795 | 45 Words

Hoochman
Level: 81

POSTS: 1488/1686
POST EXP: 65457
LVL EXP: 4965380
CP: 345.9
VIZ: 142432

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
My opinion on it is that it sounds dumb on the outside. But it hasn't really mattered since 2000 when the EV conflicted with the PV. Even than, We've only had a few elections where that's happened. If it happens again than I'll be angry.
My opinion on it is that it sounds dumb on the outside. But it hasn't really mattered since 2000 when the EV conflicted with the PV. Even than, We've only had a few elections where that's happened. If it happens again than I'll be angry.
Member

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 02-25-10
Location: Minnesota
Last Post: 3213 days
Last Active: 549 days

11-09-11 06:27 PM
warmaker is Offline
| ID: 494870 | 89 Words

warmaker
Level: 91

POSTS: 541/2198
POST EXP: 240742
LVL EXP: 7343433
CP: 4969.1
VIZ: 198528

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
The election for all officials should be popular and not based on the electoral college.  It made sense 200 years ago, even 50 years ago, when information could not be easily moved from point to point around the country.  With instant access to information nowadays, it only makes sense that the elections for national, state, and local politicians is purely popular.

You could easily win with more votes and lose to the electoral college.  That doesn't seem like democracy to me.  Of course, we don't live in a democracy.
The election for all officials should be popular and not based on the electoral college.  It made sense 200 years ago, even 50 years ago, when information could not be easily moved from point to point around the country.  With instant access to information nowadays, it only makes sense that the elections for national, state, and local politicians is purely popular.

You could easily win with more votes and lose to the electoral college.  That doesn't seem like democracy to me.  Of course, we don't live in a democracy.
Trusted Member

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 05-02-10
Location: Honolulu, HI
Last Post: 3174 days
Last Active: 2837 days

11-09-11 06:52 PM
thenumberone is Offline
| ID: 494897 | 45 Words

thenumberone
Level: 143


POSTS: 2493/6365
POST EXP: 365694
LVL EXP: 35015431
CP: 4946.4
VIZ: 329756

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
Its dumb to have so few people voting but then again,i think presidential elections are dumb,you can have a democrat president and republican congress,it just makes policy making mad.
I think if presidential elections must stay it should only be open to the majority party.
Its dumb to have so few people voting but then again,i think presidential elections are dumb,you can have a democrat president and republican congress,it just makes policy making mad.
I think if presidential elections must stay it should only be open to the majority party.
Vizzed Elite
Bleeding Heart Liberal


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 03-22-11
Last Post: 3381 days
Last Active: 3381 days

11-11-11 12:10 AM
BNuge is Offline
| ID: 495794 | 101 Words

BNuge
Level: 137


POSTS: 4055/5714
POST EXP: 365399
LVL EXP: 30786547
CP: 14418.8
VIZ: 1504587

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
This was discussed in my history class back when I was in high school. The system was originally implemented because the officials decided the people weren't smart enough. They do let the people vote, but the electoral college makes it more even.

Now we keep the electoral college to keep the vote fair. If we went with popular vote, the larger states could decide the election on their own. Imagine if everyone in Texas and California all voted for the same person. The odds of that person not becoming president is pretty small considering how many people are in those states.
This was discussed in my history class back when I was in high school. The system was originally implemented because the officials decided the people weren't smart enough. They do let the people vote, but the electoral college makes it more even.

Now we keep the electoral college to keep the vote fair. If we went with popular vote, the larger states could decide the election on their own. Imagine if everyone in Texas and California all voted for the same person. The odds of that person not becoming president is pretty small considering how many people are in those states.
Vizzed Elite
Third Place in Feb 2011 VCS Achieved Ravering Syndrome + on Jan 6, 2012


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 04-30-10
Location: Northeast US
Last Post: 1191 days
Last Active: 416 days

11-12-11 02:18 AM
random404error is Offline
| ID: 496436 | 50 Words

random404error
Level: 6

POSTS: 2/4
POST EXP: 206
LVL EXP: 537
CP: 18.0
VIZ: 3254

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
Because of the Electoral vote we got a second Bush in office despite the Popular vote. It definitely should be up to the people. More so, there should be laws against  "big wigs" (banks and large Corp.) funding campaigns. Politicians make a lot of money pushing for corporate agenda .
Because of the Electoral vote we got a second Bush in office despite the Popular vote. It definitely should be up to the people. More so, there should be laws against  "big wigs" (banks and large Corp.) funding campaigns. Politicians make a lot of money pushing for corporate agenda .
Newbie

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 11-11-11
Last Post: 4520 days
Last Active: 3090 days

11-15-11 07:54 AM
Elara is Offline
| ID: 498518 | 67 Words

Elara
Level: 115


POSTS: 2665/3383
POST EXP: 286046
LVL EXP: 16520738
CP: 1070.0
VIZ: 211251

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
As much as it doesn't seem to make sense, BNuge pretty much sums up why the Electoral College is necessary... all it would take is the majority of people in California or Texas voting for one candidate and they would dominate.

I used to be more for the popular vote... then California elected Arnold Schwarzenegger as governor and I realized just how right the Founding Fathers were.
As much as it doesn't seem to make sense, BNuge pretty much sums up why the Electoral College is necessary... all it would take is the majority of people in California or Texas voting for one candidate and they would dominate.

I used to be more for the popular vote... then California elected Arnold Schwarzenegger as governor and I realized just how right the Founding Fathers were.
Vizzed Elite
Dark Elf Goddess
Penguins Fan


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 12-08-04
Last Post: 2361 days
Last Active: 1753 days

11-15-11 08:04 AM
hnnn is Offline
| ID: 498523 | 53 Words

hnnn
Level: 81


POSTS: 1320/1655
POST EXP: 35504
LVL EXP: 4836627
CP: 596.9
VIZ: 61890

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
We had a debate about this yesterday at school
I think it should be the popular vote because with the current system if you win texas , california,Florida thats pretty much with winning afew more small states.
but with popular vote its every vote in every state counted to decide on a winner
We had a debate about this yesterday at school
I think it should be the popular vote because with the current system if you win texas , california,Florida thats pretty much with winning afew more small states.
but with popular vote its every vote in every state counted to decide on a winner
Trusted Member
I'm the man in the box


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 02-09-10
Location: South Louisiana
Last Post: 305 days
Last Active: 185 days

11-15-11 09:12 AM
rcarter2 is Offline
| ID: 498534 | 242 Words

rcarter2
Level: 161


POSTS: 1350/8463
POST EXP: 758515
LVL EXP: 53456199
CP: 33586.4
VIZ: 1689508

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
Even though I despise the fact that the electoral college was what led to 4 more years of Bush, I think it is necessary. BNuge explained it well. Even though hnnn said that if you get those three big states, it is a win, it can be even more so if popular vote were the deciding factor simply with how many people are in those states. The ratio of people in those larger states to smaller states is far more overwhelming than the amount of electoral college votes the big states gets compared to the smaller states. There is one thing I have disliked about the electoral college method though. I don't like that if a state is say 51%-49% split, ALL the electoral college votes go to the side that got the 51%. I think a more representative way of college votes is to take how many votes were counted in the state, find the percentage of votes for both sides, and split the electoral votes accordingly. If a state has 4 electoral college votes, and 25% of the people voted for one candidate, then that candidate should get 1 electoral college vote from that state. That way, if you are not on the majority side of your state, your vote will still at least mean something. With the way it is now, all votes against the majority for that state really don't matter, which is not good representation of democracy. 
Even though I despise the fact that the electoral college was what led to 4 more years of Bush, I think it is necessary. BNuge explained it well. Even though hnnn said that if you get those three big states, it is a win, it can be even more so if popular vote were the deciding factor simply with how many people are in those states. The ratio of people in those larger states to smaller states is far more overwhelming than the amount of electoral college votes the big states gets compared to the smaller states. There is one thing I have disliked about the electoral college method though. I don't like that if a state is say 51%-49% split, ALL the electoral college votes go to the side that got the 51%. I think a more representative way of college votes is to take how many votes were counted in the state, find the percentage of votes for both sides, and split the electoral votes accordingly. If a state has 4 electoral college votes, and 25% of the people voted for one candidate, then that candidate should get 1 electoral college vote from that state. That way, if you are not on the majority side of your state, your vote will still at least mean something. With the way it is now, all votes against the majority for that state really don't matter, which is not good representation of democracy. 
Vizzed Elite
Dominating RGR Competition Hall of Fame Table!


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 05-01-11
Location: Kansas
Last Post: 2438 days
Last Active: 747 days

11-16-11 09:14 AM
thenumberone is Offline
| ID: 499139 | 25 Words

thenumberone
Level: 143


POSTS: 2594/6365
POST EXP: 365694
LVL EXP: 35015431
CP: 4946.4
VIZ: 329756

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
rcarter2 : Well then maybe it would be wise to rethink the states to try and make them more equal in terms of population size.
rcarter2 : Well then maybe it would be wise to rethink the states to try and make them more equal in terms of population size.
Vizzed Elite
Bleeding Heart Liberal


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 03-22-11
Last Post: 3381 days
Last Active: 3381 days

11-16-11 10:40 AM
rcarter2 is Offline
| ID: 499154 | 17 Words

rcarter2
Level: 161


POSTS: 1364/8463
POST EXP: 758515
LVL EXP: 53456199
CP: 33586.4
VIZ: 1689508

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
thenumberone : I'm not quite understanding this. How would we make the states equal in population size?
thenumberone : I'm not quite understanding this. How would we make the states equal in population size?
Vizzed Elite
Dominating RGR Competition Hall of Fame Table!


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 05-01-11
Location: Kansas
Last Post: 2438 days
Last Active: 747 days

11-16-11 11:52 AM
thenumberone is Offline
| ID: 499187 | 23 Words

thenumberone
Level: 143


POSTS: 2595/6365
POST EXP: 365694
LVL EXP: 35015431
CP: 4946.4
VIZ: 329756

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
rcarter2 : you'd carve em up,theyre just legislative areas,making them smaller should,hypothetically,improve regional efficiency as a knock on effect of more localised governance.
rcarter2 : you'd carve em up,theyre just legislative areas,making them smaller should,hypothetically,improve regional efficiency as a knock on effect of more localised governance.
Vizzed Elite
Bleeding Heart Liberal


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 03-22-11
Last Post: 3381 days
Last Active: 3381 days

11-18-11 11:11 PM
Elara is Offline
| ID: 500593 | 128 Words

Elara
Level: 115


POSTS: 2670/3383
POST EXP: 286046
LVL EXP: 16520738
CP: 1070.0
VIZ: 211251

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
rcarter2 : I agree. Something like that happened in Nebraska in 2008 I think (or was it Kansas?)... one district voted so overwhelmingly for Obama that one of the states electoral votes went to him while the rest went to McCain. I think in a case of a close split like a 51:49 that the votes should be divided as evenly as possible with the 51% candidate getting one higher vote.

thenumberone : It is not possible. People identify so strongly with their state that they would never consent to it being redrawn. There is too much history. It would be like Parliament declaring that they were going to divide the island of Great Britain into equal thirds... do you really think that anyone would stand for that?
rcarter2 : I agree. Something like that happened in Nebraska in 2008 I think (or was it Kansas?)... one district voted so overwhelmingly for Obama that one of the states electoral votes went to him while the rest went to McCain. I think in a case of a close split like a 51:49 that the votes should be divided as evenly as possible with the 51% candidate getting one higher vote.

thenumberone : It is not possible. People identify so strongly with their state that they would never consent to it being redrawn. There is too much history. It would be like Parliament declaring that they were going to divide the island of Great Britain into equal thirds... do you really think that anyone would stand for that?
Vizzed Elite
Dark Elf Goddess
Penguins Fan


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 12-08-04
Last Post: 2361 days
Last Active: 1753 days

11-19-11 05:58 AM
thenumberone is Offline
| ID: 500760 | 133 Words

thenumberone
Level: 143


POSTS: 2707/6365
POST EXP: 365694
LVL EXP: 35015431
CP: 4946.4
VIZ: 329756

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
Elara : well scotland already is about a 3rd =p
Although that depends on context,if it was dividing independence wish perhaps no,if it was dividing legislative wise id say yes. In the years in which scotland has regained its own parliament wealth has increase, and things like knife and gun crime have gone down.
A lot of progress can be made from decisions like that.
In the case of states,most were never countrys,and shown by the arrow straight borders further west they werd drawn up federaly. Whoever drew them up was a moron too i would add. Look at the size of california.
At the end of the day, livelyhood should take precedence over identity, i dont think anyone in the states would agree,but then again nationalism is somewhat stronger in the usa.
Elara : well scotland already is about a 3rd =p
Although that depends on context,if it was dividing independence wish perhaps no,if it was dividing legislative wise id say yes. In the years in which scotland has regained its own parliament wealth has increase, and things like knife and gun crime have gone down.
A lot of progress can be made from decisions like that.
In the case of states,most were never countrys,and shown by the arrow straight borders further west they werd drawn up federaly. Whoever drew them up was a moron too i would add. Look at the size of california.
At the end of the day, livelyhood should take precedence over identity, i dont think anyone in the states would agree,but then again nationalism is somewhat stronger in the usa.
Vizzed Elite
Bleeding Heart Liberal


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 03-22-11
Last Post: 3381 days
Last Active: 3381 days

11-19-11 11:37 PM
Elara is Offline
| ID: 501390 | 258 Words

Elara
Level: 115


POSTS: 2671/3383
POST EXP: 286046
LVL EXP: 16520738
CP: 1070.0
VIZ: 211251

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
thenumberone : I mean  really divide it up, which would mean that everything south of Liverpool, including London would now be part of Wales, and pretty much everything south of Glasgow would become England. I don't think people would be happy with that.

But yeah, the thirteen original colonies were pretty much little nations unto themselves until the ratification of the Constitution, even printing their own unique money, charging tariffs for out of state goods, etc etc. That mindset, though lessened to a degree, persisted in the formation of the newer states... which started out as independent territories free from US rule (it's why the "wild west" is such a fascinating period to study). I think the series Deadwood demonstrates that idea best. Such loyalty to state was also one of the big things about the American Civil War. General Robert E. Lee was offered control of the UNION Army when the war was just breaking out, but he was from Virginia, one of the states trying to secede, and later the capital of the Confederacy... and though he felt that secession was a bad idea (and there are many sources confirming this), he refused to fight against his native state, instead resigning his commission and returning home, declaring that he would never again raise his sword, "except in defense of my native state of Virginia."

I will admit though that I have now idea how most of the state boundries came about except for those that go along rivers (such as the states bordering the Mississippi River)
thenumberone : I mean  really divide it up, which would mean that everything south of Liverpool, including London would now be part of Wales, and pretty much everything south of Glasgow would become England. I don't think people would be happy with that.

But yeah, the thirteen original colonies were pretty much little nations unto themselves until the ratification of the Constitution, even printing their own unique money, charging tariffs for out of state goods, etc etc. That mindset, though lessened to a degree, persisted in the formation of the newer states... which started out as independent territories free from US rule (it's why the "wild west" is such a fascinating period to study). I think the series Deadwood demonstrates that idea best. Such loyalty to state was also one of the big things about the American Civil War. General Robert E. Lee was offered control of the UNION Army when the war was just breaking out, but he was from Virginia, one of the states trying to secede, and later the capital of the Confederacy... and though he felt that secession was a bad idea (and there are many sources confirming this), he refused to fight against his native state, instead resigning his commission and returning home, declaring that he would never again raise his sword, "except in defense of my native state of Virginia."

I will admit though that I have now idea how most of the state boundries came about except for those that go along rivers (such as the states bordering the Mississippi River)
Vizzed Elite
Dark Elf Goddess
Penguins Fan


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 12-08-04
Last Post: 2361 days
Last Active: 1753 days

11-20-11 05:42 AM
thenumberone is Offline
| ID: 501508 | 181 Words

thenumberone
Level: 143


POSTS: 2742/6365
POST EXP: 365694
LVL EXP: 35015431
CP: 4946.4
VIZ: 329756

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
Elara : Well tbh i wouldnt suggest deviding based on land mass,but on population size.
A lot of the us states were simply bought or conquered off europeans and hence never independence.
Personaly,i see little problem,the variaton state to state culturaly etc is not massive,and they always will be part of the usa so other than state legislation states are pretty insignificant.
The difference in the uk can be shown by the fact that in the south,it was a major(politically)conservative victory,whereas accross the border they only got one seat.
I think a president/prime minister should be the one thats leader of his party(by the vote of his party)because voting for both seperately is going to reduce efficiency quite dramatically.
And when consistant politically different votes keep coming from certain regions i think thats when to split,traditional ideas of nations are flawed and over nationalistic,they should be based on political outlook.
This is interesting(link).i dont think less states would be as beneficial as more states but it does identify good reasons for change.
Like each us citizen saving about 100 bucks.
http://www.tjc.com/38states/
Elara : Well tbh i wouldnt suggest deviding based on land mass,but on population size.
A lot of the us states were simply bought or conquered off europeans and hence never independence.
Personaly,i see little problem,the variaton state to state culturaly etc is not massive,and they always will be part of the usa so other than state legislation states are pretty insignificant.
The difference in the uk can be shown by the fact that in the south,it was a major(politically)conservative victory,whereas accross the border they only got one seat.
I think a president/prime minister should be the one thats leader of his party(by the vote of his party)because voting for both seperately is going to reduce efficiency quite dramatically.
And when consistant politically different votes keep coming from certain regions i think thats when to split,traditional ideas of nations are flawed and over nationalistic,they should be based on political outlook.
This is interesting(link).i dont think less states would be as beneficial as more states but it does identify good reasons for change.
Like each us citizen saving about 100 bucks.
http://www.tjc.com/38states/
Vizzed Elite
Bleeding Heart Liberal


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 03-22-11
Last Post: 3381 days
Last Active: 3381 days

11-20-11 06:22 AM
Elara is Offline
| ID: 501516 | 123 Words

Elara
Level: 115


POSTS: 2672/3383
POST EXP: 286046
LVL EXP: 16520738
CP: 1070.0
VIZ: 211251

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
thenumberone : Is it sad that the proposed state of Erie doesn't even touch Lake Erie?

And there actually is more cultural variation than you'd think... you just never notice it until you pass through it. I mean, yeah by and large it's not radically different, but it is enough. Just the whole "soda vs pop" transition sets my teeth on edge. Dividing based on political outlook doesn't really work as well here, as I've noticed that the large urban areas are largely democratic while rural areas are more republican... if we did political division we'd end up with hundreds of states for ever major city like Philadelphia, Los Angeles, St. Louis, etc etc that are tiny, surrounded by large--yet sparsely populated--republican states.
thenumberone : Is it sad that the proposed state of Erie doesn't even touch Lake Erie?

And there actually is more cultural variation than you'd think... you just never notice it until you pass through it. I mean, yeah by and large it's not radically different, but it is enough. Just the whole "soda vs pop" transition sets my teeth on edge. Dividing based on political outlook doesn't really work as well here, as I've noticed that the large urban areas are largely democratic while rural areas are more republican... if we did political division we'd end up with hundreds of states for ever major city like Philadelphia, Los Angeles, St. Louis, etc etc that are tiny, surrounded by large--yet sparsely populated--republican states.
Vizzed Elite
Dark Elf Goddess
Penguins Fan


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 12-08-04
Last Post: 2361 days
Last Active: 1753 days

11-20-11 06:40 AM
thenumberone is Offline
| ID: 501518 | 129 Words

thenumberone
Level: 143


POSTS: 2745/6365
POST EXP: 365694
LVL EXP: 35015431
CP: 4946.4
VIZ: 329756

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
Elara : haha,youd think he wouldnt have called the state erie then,perhaps he didnt know.
I was interested by the fact many citys cross states making it an ergonomical nightmare,ie which state pays for what,and for all or part etc.
Hmm,i see,well plenty of states have no rural regions so it'd work there.
The problem with the usa,is so much focuss was put on expansion very little planing went to structure until it was too late.certainly theres no easy solution but some changes really need to be made.
Just a slight tangent for one second for me to say,i find it strange that the usa only has 2 noticeable partys that are barely any different,i get the impresion a lot of americans are scared of the idea of change.
Elara : haha,youd think he wouldnt have called the state erie then,perhaps he didnt know.
I was interested by the fact many citys cross states making it an ergonomical nightmare,ie which state pays for what,and for all or part etc.
Hmm,i see,well plenty of states have no rural regions so it'd work there.
The problem with the usa,is so much focuss was put on expansion very little planing went to structure until it was too late.certainly theres no easy solution but some changes really need to be made.
Just a slight tangent for one second for me to say,i find it strange that the usa only has 2 noticeable partys that are barely any different,i get the impresion a lot of americans are scared of the idea of change.
Vizzed Elite
Bleeding Heart Liberal


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 03-22-11
Last Post: 3381 days
Last Active: 3381 days

11-20-11 07:16 PM
Elara is Offline
| ID: 502033 | 37 Words

Elara
Level: 115


POSTS: 2673/3383
POST EXP: 286046
LVL EXP: 16520738
CP: 1070.0
VIZ: 211251

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
thenumberone : As a long-suffering member of one of the third parties, I have to agree. I mean, it isn't like everyone is afraid of change... just the ones that scream loudest and/or have the most money.
thenumberone : As a long-suffering member of one of the third parties, I have to agree. I mean, it isn't like everyone is afraid of change... just the ones that scream loudest and/or have the most money.
Vizzed Elite
Dark Elf Goddess
Penguins Fan


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 12-08-04
Last Post: 2361 days
Last Active: 1753 days

Links

Page Comments


This page has no comments

Adblocker detected!

Vizzed.com is very expensive to keep alive! The Ads pay for the servers.

Vizzed has 3 TB worth of games and 1 TB worth of music.  This site is free to use but the ads barely pay for the monthly server fees.  If too many more people use ad block, the site cannot survive.

We prioritize the community over the site profits.  This is why we avoid using annoying (but high paying) ads like most other sites which include popups, obnoxious sounds and animations, malware, and other forms of intrusiveness.  We'll do our part to never resort to these types of ads, please do your part by helping support this site by adding Vizzed.com to your ad blocking whitelist.

×