In my personal opinion, this is only possible if all of us were to die... the entire human race to do extinct.

I honestly don't think that people will ever achieve world peace. Even if we would happen to achieve it there will always be some negativity floating around that causes some type of war, jealousy, hatred etc. People tend to get jealous if others have more or something better than what they do. People also tend to dislike anybody who is different than themselves. Even if the world was to beak apart and live in different societies where everyone was the same and every other society was not in contact, somebody would still get jealous and cause some sort of drama or a war of sometime. But this is just my opinion, and I'm speaking hypothetically. Could I be wrong? Yes. Could I be right as well? Yes. 

In my own opinion sadly no I don't think world peace will ever be possible so long as we have world leaders who all view things  in different ways and have different views on multiple matters such as personal individual rights, capitalism, communism, and religion as well as race. Sadly there will never be in my opinion world peace also because of issues like food, and water and natural resources and raw material distribution among nations.

There is a saying, I forgot who said it though...I think it was Jimi Hendrix

"Once the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will know peace." so it is possible...incredibly difficult but just because something is difficult doesn't mean it is impossible.

I'm sure there will never be world peace. There will always be greedy people who care only for themselves. 

I feel that world peace is almost impossible to achieve and perceive. I do however feel that if one thing could be done to achieve world peace that thing would be to eradicate religion. Nothing separates the world like religion does. I know everyone is gonna disagree with me but it is a fact that people need to understand. That is all I'm gonna say on this topic, I could go on rants for hours explaining religions impact on all these controversies and wars but I will not because you guys are probably not intelligent enough to comprehend the impact that religion has on this world and well......I wouldn't want to confuse you all or disprove your religous views.

Nope I don't think world peace will ever be possible because nations constantly fight over things like distribution of natural resources, what form of government they should have.

I don't think that is even possible in my opinion and I wish it was possible and hopefully the world gets more peaceful in the future.

World Peace is possible.

We have the "tech" to destroy the world ten times over.

We put a man on the moon.

We Finished W.W.2.

So what if the there are a grand number of problems?

I am not saying that World Peace is within my lifetime.
But
I find it odd that man can invent a machine that can power a city that runs on dung. Yet still no one thinks Peace can be established.

I find it odd that man can invent new artifical limbs and nanotech robots to cure just about everything and still, no sight of peace on the horizon?

I love the drama of comic books and a bleak future too. But...
Peace is very "Possible".

Get off your buts and do something about it if you are so concerned. (If you are not apart of the solution? You may be apart of the problem.)
Good Luck.

Good Luck To All.
I'm done. Stick a fork in me.
Peace.

Most likely no. People have different idea's and are willing to fight to propagate them.

 Never national and state peace is hard enough let alone global.

No I don't think world peace
will ever be possible so long as we have world leaders who all view
things  in different ways and have different views on multiple matters
such as personal individual rights, capitalism, communism, and religion
as well as race. Sadly there will never be in world peace
also because of issues like food, and water and natural resources and
raw material distribution among nations. In addition world peace will never be established as long as nations try to become better than one another and try to out do each other and feel as though one nation is superior and has superiority over the others.

Let's take a step back and not focus on a man alone, but what can be done on the nation-state/international level about world peace-- rather than starting small, let's talk about it as a broad topic.

So, can world peace be achieved?

The philosopher John Mueller points out that we're actually closer to achieving world peace than we realize-- the general definition of war isn't being used in the same, consistent context as before.

Today's "wars" are not exactly wars, but armed conflicts. The difference? The violence seen today in the Middle East and elsewhere is not seen on the same level as either World War. Trench warfare doesn't exist, along with gassing or massive genocide close to the millions. While genocide has happened and hasn't been stopped in some cases (see Rwanda), the death totals don't match up to what happened during the Holocaust.

What has stopped these massive wars from happening? The state of the global economy. If the bigger countries (America, China, Russia) were to start physically fighting, the global economy will collapse because the strongest are battling amongst themselves. America no longer has the capability to support the world economy on its own back, so war between America and China/Russia isn't going to happen easily, even though relations can be shaky at times. (The train of thought is that developed countries do not fight each other in the name of global treaties and trading.)

While Mueller points that out, Francis Beer has two theories-- peace creation and war reduction.

One of the many outcomes of World War II (and the Great Depression) is how the global community was established. The powers in charge realized that in order to prevent such a tragedy from happening, prevention was necessary. The United Nations was created (peace creation) in order to act as a moderator between countries. Measures can be taken to prevent war from happening, which the UN does. Sometimes, it works, other times, it fails, but World War III has yet to happen. Along with peacekeeping organizations, the global economy has also been established in a much different way from the powers fighting.

But Beer also calls for the loss of the nation-state's independence and one world government, but right now, the nation-states are independent enough to make their own decisions.

Beer's other theory, war reduction, also has to deal with containment of possible conflicts or wars, along with management of nuclear weapons and the arms trade, both of which have been curbed in the recent years.

Immanuel Kant also offers his own views on world peace-- more structured than Beer, they're both on the same track about international peace organizations. Kant believes all governments need to be republican in nature (which hardly actually exist), along with a list of requirements for the republicans exist-- no grudges in peace treaties, no domination of one state or another, no standing armies, no national debt for military purposes, and interference with another country's governance. Kant pushes for all nation-states to be equal, so there is no need to attack one country to gain their wealth.

With such a big picture painted, does it seem possible that world peace can be created? We're so much closer to it then we were 100 years ago and a lot closer to it than we were, even 60 years ago.

(This was a 6 page paper on world peace that I summed up from a philosophy class on War and Peace.) 

Its pretty much impossible and will never happen since theres always somebody who will disagree with somebody else.
Especially since we all have different cultures,beliefs etc.

Sadly, it's just a fantasy. Nothing can let us achieve this feat. Sure, we can achieve happiness, but even that has its limits. For the whole world to be happy... That can't be possible. We can thrive and thrive, yet, there will always be someone who disagrees with another. In order for "world peace" we'd need to eliminate every problem there is. But, sadly, we can't. We can't house every poor person there is. We can't stop thieves from stealing. It all depends on our people, and how they react, and on this matter, face against problems.

I don't think that it is possible because there will always be a terrorist somewhere, or a secret weapon somewhere, or someone complaining about another thing and the list goes on and on. Maybe, if everyone would just be nice to each other, there would be world peace!

well i dont know if there will ever be peace because of racist people and people who kill and and people that are on drugs so i dont know 

With or without technology, no, not at the rate we're going with our heated flame wars. www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q6ctb-Pb3lc