Remove Ad, Sign Up
Register to Remove Ad
Register to Remove Ad
Remove Ad, Sign Up
Register to Remove Ad
Register to Remove Ad
Signup for Free!
-More Features-
-Far Less Ads-
About   Users   Help
Users & Guests Online
On Page: 1
Directory: 2 & 88
Entire Site: 4 & 863
Page Staff: pennylessz, pokemon x, Barathemos, tgags123, alexanyways, RavusRat,
04-23-24 12:06 PM

Forum Links

Cannibalism
I'll have a human liver with some fava beans and a nice Chianti
Related Threads
Coming Soon

Thread Information

Views
1,835
Replies
17
Rating
3
Status
CLOSED
Thread
Creator
Oldschool41
08-18-13 10:23 PM
Last
Post
Brigand
10-27-13 02:20 PM
Additional Thread Details
Views: 449
Today: 0
Users: 0 unique

Thread Actions

Thread Closed
New Thread
New Poll
Order
 

Cannibalism

 

08-18-13 10:23 PM
Oldschool41 is Offline
| ID: 869272 | 584 Words

Oldschool41
Level: 83

POSTS: 1650/1799
POST EXP: 163693
LVL EXP: 5355815
CP: 977.6
VIZ: 17776

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
Good day fellow Vizzed board members.

So I've been trying to think of an interesting debate topic, but I haven't been able to think of a good one. So after going through the list of Debate topics, I found that we don't have a topic about Cannibalism (unless I overlooked...but we do have a ton of threads about Sex). So I figure I make one about this topic.

So I'm sure as all of you know, Cannibalism is the act of a human eating another human. It was a common practice in some ancient cultures (usually Native American or African); but today we tend to think of Cannibalism as a great evil thing to do (I say this loosely).  There are also legal cases that had been decided as well...

In the case of R v Dudley and Stephens, 4 men had their boat sank and they were stuck in the middle of the ocean without any food. The men decided that the only way to survive is to eat someone. They drew lots and a Seventeen year old was the loser (talk about bad luck), but the 3 other men couldn't do it. After a couple of days later in which the same Seventeen year old lost conciseness (supposedly) and the 3 men finally gave in to the hunger and killed/ate the boy. A couple of days after killing him, a passing ship rescued them. The 3 men were arrest and charged with murder. 2 of the man (Dudley and Stephens) were convicted of murder and sentenced to 6 months imprisonment (both men were later pardoned by the Queen...at least according to my Law book, but then again this was an English Case Law and I was reading it from an American Case Law book).

Dudley and Stephens claimed that necessity defense. This is a defense that argues that had these 2 men not killed and eaten the 17 year old boy, both they and the boy would have died from hunger. While the defense failed to get them off the charge, the defense raised an interesting issue.

And as some of you might know, during the infamous Donner Party crossing of 1846; these people also resorted to cannibalism after they were trapped in a freak snowstorm and had little to no food available.

In a more modern area, there was a story involving a person posting an ad on a computer (I think it was in Germany) were a guy was asking people if they would mind if he could eat them. One person said yes to the ad, the two people met up, and the guy who posted the ad ate the person.

Now in todays Modern area, most "civilized" societies view cannibalism as an immoral or evil act to commit, unless a person is forced to commit cannibalism in order to save his life (at which point the public still views it as immoral or evil, but they can see why they would commit such an act)

So that is a little background on the history of cannibalism. Now its time for you guys to speak you mind about this topic...

What is your guys opinion on Cannibalism?

Should a person in the same situation as Dudley and the Donner party be excused for killing/eating someone if they know they will die if they don't (make sure you read the Dudley and Donner stuff before you answer this question)?

Is performing an act of Cannibalism an immoral/evil act to commit?
Good day fellow Vizzed board members.

So I've been trying to think of an interesting debate topic, but I haven't been able to think of a good one. So after going through the list of Debate topics, I found that we don't have a topic about Cannibalism (unless I overlooked...but we do have a ton of threads about Sex). So I figure I make one about this topic.

So I'm sure as all of you know, Cannibalism is the act of a human eating another human. It was a common practice in some ancient cultures (usually Native American or African); but today we tend to think of Cannibalism as a great evil thing to do (I say this loosely).  There are also legal cases that had been decided as well...

In the case of R v Dudley and Stephens, 4 men had their boat sank and they were stuck in the middle of the ocean without any food. The men decided that the only way to survive is to eat someone. They drew lots and a Seventeen year old was the loser (talk about bad luck), but the 3 other men couldn't do it. After a couple of days later in which the same Seventeen year old lost conciseness (supposedly) and the 3 men finally gave in to the hunger and killed/ate the boy. A couple of days after killing him, a passing ship rescued them. The 3 men were arrest and charged with murder. 2 of the man (Dudley and Stephens) were convicted of murder and sentenced to 6 months imprisonment (both men were later pardoned by the Queen...at least according to my Law book, but then again this was an English Case Law and I was reading it from an American Case Law book).

Dudley and Stephens claimed that necessity defense. This is a defense that argues that had these 2 men not killed and eaten the 17 year old boy, both they and the boy would have died from hunger. While the defense failed to get them off the charge, the defense raised an interesting issue.

And as some of you might know, during the infamous Donner Party crossing of 1846; these people also resorted to cannibalism after they were trapped in a freak snowstorm and had little to no food available.

In a more modern area, there was a story involving a person posting an ad on a computer (I think it was in Germany) were a guy was asking people if they would mind if he could eat them. One person said yes to the ad, the two people met up, and the guy who posted the ad ate the person.

Now in todays Modern area, most "civilized" societies view cannibalism as an immoral or evil act to commit, unless a person is forced to commit cannibalism in order to save his life (at which point the public still views it as immoral or evil, but they can see why they would commit such an act)

So that is a little background on the history of cannibalism. Now its time for you guys to speak you mind about this topic...

What is your guys opinion on Cannibalism?

Should a person in the same situation as Dudley and the Donner party be excused for killing/eating someone if they know they will die if they don't (make sure you read the Dudley and Donner stuff before you answer this question)?

Is performing an act of Cannibalism an immoral/evil act to commit?
Trusted Member
A wise man speaks because he has something to say. A fool speaks because he has to say something.


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 10-27-10
Last Post: 2799 days
Last Active: 2360 days

08-18-13 11:01 PM
Divine Aurora is Offline
| ID: 869282 | 86 Words

Divine Aurora
Level: 90


POSTS: 1444/2334
POST EXP: 191444
LVL EXP: 7095536
CP: 12193.7
VIZ: 504429

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
Well I feel as though the Dudley and Donner party should not be pardoned because they still killed someone and took a life not out of self defense although I understand but can't condom or overlook what they did I understand why they did it but I feel they should still get some jail time. Cannibalism in my opinion is sick and inhuman and in some cases defiles humanity and the dead and yes I do think cannibalism is immoral and a evil act to commit.
Well I feel as though the Dudley and Donner party should not be pardoned because they still killed someone and took a life not out of self defense although I understand but can't condom or overlook what they did I understand why they did it but I feel they should still get some jail time. Cannibalism in my opinion is sick and inhuman and in some cases defiles humanity and the dead and yes I do think cannibalism is immoral and a evil act to commit.
Vizzed Elite


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 06-20-13
Last Post: 217 days
Last Active: 197 days

08-19-13 12:23 PM
TreasurePlanet23 is Offline
| ID: 869508 | 36 Words

Level: 49


POSTS: 338/570
POST EXP: 33759
LVL EXP: 858612
CP: 1515.3
VIZ: 4283

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
Personally, my take on cannibalism is disgusting and fowl. I would never think or do something to that extent. That's just my opinion on it, obviously other people will disagree with me, but that is ok!
Personally, my take on cannibalism is disgusting and fowl. I would never think or do something to that extent. That's just my opinion on it, obviously other people will disagree with me, but that is ok!
Member
Basketball Rat


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 05-30-13
Last Post: 3445 days
Last Active: 764 days

08-19-13 02:25 PM
rcarter2 is Offline
| ID: 869588 | 331 Words

rcarter2
Level: 161


POSTS: 6708/8463
POST EXP: 758515
LVL EXP: 53604767
CP: 33586.4
VIZ: 1689508

Likes: 2  Dislikes: 0
Well..... um... okay.

Given the fact that Dudley and Stephens did not wait for the other person to die before eating him, they most definitely are guilty of murder. I consider self defense a case where you defend your life against another who, at that moment, is intent on harming you or ending your life. This was not the case. You can say that the kid agreed to the whole draw straws thing, but that in no way is some kind of true consent. If he were really consenting to it, he might have ended his own life for the other 2. 

Now on cannibalism itself. It really is a slipper slope topic and kind of a double edge sword (2 metaphors in 1 sentence! ). There can be a situation where you don't do it and you die. If you do it for survival, others will not be able to look at you the same way. You probably won't be able to look at yourself the same way. Right now, while not in that situation, I believe that I would starve before doing that. Even more so to someone I knew (or even loved). But I'm sure Dudley and Stephens thought the same. I am sure the people of the Donner party would think the same. You never quite know what you are truly capable of when you are on the brink of death until you are put in that situation. I can't predict what I would really do, but I do believe I wouldn't do it even if that meant death.

I personally do not condone it. I don't think that it is always a sign of evil. It is more of a deal on how much worth do you put on your own life? Do you believe your life worth is higher than the cost of eating another person to survive? Hope I never have to find out if I value my life that much or not.
Well..... um... okay.

Given the fact that Dudley and Stephens did not wait for the other person to die before eating him, they most definitely are guilty of murder. I consider self defense a case where you defend your life against another who, at that moment, is intent on harming you or ending your life. This was not the case. You can say that the kid agreed to the whole draw straws thing, but that in no way is some kind of true consent. If he were really consenting to it, he might have ended his own life for the other 2. 

Now on cannibalism itself. It really is a slipper slope topic and kind of a double edge sword (2 metaphors in 1 sentence! ). There can be a situation where you don't do it and you die. If you do it for survival, others will not be able to look at you the same way. You probably won't be able to look at yourself the same way. Right now, while not in that situation, I believe that I would starve before doing that. Even more so to someone I knew (or even loved). But I'm sure Dudley and Stephens thought the same. I am sure the people of the Donner party would think the same. You never quite know what you are truly capable of when you are on the brink of death until you are put in that situation. I can't predict what I would really do, but I do believe I wouldn't do it even if that meant death.

I personally do not condone it. I don't think that it is always a sign of evil. It is more of a deal on how much worth do you put on your own life? Do you believe your life worth is higher than the cost of eating another person to survive? Hope I never have to find out if I value my life that much or not.
Vizzed Elite
Dominating RGR Competition Hall of Fame Table!


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 05-01-11
Location: Kansas
Last Post: 2464 days
Last Active: 773 days

Post Rating: 2   Liked By: Singelli, Vincent1875,

08-29-13 07:55 AM
Light Knight is Offline
| ID: 873430 | 101 Words

Light Knight
Davideo3.14
Level: 121


POSTS: 1753/3819
POST EXP: 276083
LVL EXP: 19852747
CP: 11293.5
VIZ: 1051184

Likes: 1  Dislikes: 0
I have to answer this in two ways.

First, socially. I think, of course, each individual has the right to make their own decisions. So if someone they are with dies, and they eat them, they cannot be convicted of any crime, legally.  But they will live the consequences of their actions; that might include being shunned or ostracized.

Secondly, personally. I think it's wrong in all contexts, and would rather die than eat another human. Although there is no "logical" reason for this, I think it is dishonorable and immoral; it is repulsive to most human's minds for a reason.
I have to answer this in two ways.

First, socially. I think, of course, each individual has the right to make their own decisions. So if someone they are with dies, and they eat them, they cannot be convicted of any crime, legally.  But they will live the consequences of their actions; that might include being shunned or ostracized.

Secondly, personally. I think it's wrong in all contexts, and would rather die than eat another human. Although there is no "logical" reason for this, I think it is dishonorable and immoral; it is repulsive to most human's minds for a reason.
Vizzed Elite
Former Admin
Loyal Knight of Vizzed


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 12-08-04
Location: The Internet
Last Post: 91 days
Last Active: 54 days

Post Rating: 1   Liked By: Singelli,

09-01-13 08:29 PM
tgags123 is Offline
| ID: 875860 | 59 Words

tgags123
Davideo123
Level: 162


POSTS: 532/9026
POST EXP: 546465
LVL EXP: 54335923
CP: 36113.0
VIZ: 4596107

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
One side of me is saying yes and the other side is saying no. Your are killings a person and that is wrong. Then again, we kill and eat other kinds of animals. But most of those animals were bred by us and that is the only reason they exist. I am going to say yes, Cannibalism is wrong.
One side of me is saying yes and the other side is saying no. Your are killings a person and that is wrong. Then again, we kill and eat other kinds of animals. But most of those animals were bred by us and that is the only reason they exist. I am going to say yes, Cannibalism is wrong.
Local Moderator
Winter 2019 TdV Winner


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 04-26-13
Location: Long Island, NY
Last Post: 8 days
Last Active: 40 min.

09-07-13 01:25 AM
PhoenixPhyre is Offline
| ID: 879970 | 77 Words

PhoenixPhyre
Level: 17


POSTS: 29/52
POST EXP: 14838
LVL EXP: 23385
CP: 258.2
VIZ: 7789

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
Personally, I would excuse the Donner party because the humans that they ate were already dead. In the Dudley case, however, they actually took the boy's life before they ate him, which in my opinion is crossing the boundaries of the law. What they should have done is waited until one of them died before resorting to eating them. Something that should never be done unless it an absolute necessity, and never at the cost of murder.
Personally, I would excuse the Donner party because the humans that they ate were already dead. In the Dudley case, however, they actually took the boy's life before they ate him, which in my opinion is crossing the boundaries of the law. What they should have done is waited until one of them died before resorting to eating them. Something that should never be done unless it an absolute necessity, and never at the cost of murder.
Member

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 08-30-13
Last Post: 3289 days
Last Active: 3202 days

09-08-13 12:58 AM
Zephyr is Offline
| ID: 881382 | 79 Words

Zephyr
Level: 50


POSTS: 425/529
POST EXP: 14378
LVL EXP: 899520
CP: 243.2
VIZ: 13222

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
I'd sooner die of starvation than take a bite into another human being. It's just... disgusting. In the Dudley case I'm sure if they had a couple functioning brain cells they could at least try to make a makeshift fishing net/rod and catch something. And the human body can go without food for about a week I think.... or was that water? ;

Well regardless I'd lose over 100 pounds before I decided to bite into my fellow man.
I'd sooner die of starvation than take a bite into another human being. It's just... disgusting. In the Dudley case I'm sure if they had a couple functioning brain cells they could at least try to make a makeshift fishing net/rod and catch something. And the human body can go without food for about a week I think.... or was that water? ;

Well regardless I'd lose over 100 pounds before I decided to bite into my fellow man.
Trusted Member
Can't...stop...watching...


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 05-06-09
Location: Nevada
Last Post: 3665 days
Last Active: 381 days

09-08-13 02:46 AM
PhoenixPhyre is Offline
| ID: 881401 | 33 Words

PhoenixPhyre
Level: 17


POSTS: 34/52
POST EXP: 14838
LVL EXP: 23385
CP: 258.2
VIZ: 7789

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
Zephyr: I believe it is three weeks without food, three days without water. But after the first week, I'm sure that people begin getting desperate. Not to mention cranky, can you imagine? XD
Zephyr: I believe it is three weeks without food, three days without water. But after the first week, I'm sure that people begin getting desperate. Not to mention cranky, can you imagine? XD
Member

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 08-30-13
Last Post: 3289 days
Last Active: 3202 days

(edited by PhoenixPhyre on 09-08-13 02:47 AM)    

10-25-13 08:17 PM
TetraDigm is Offline
| ID: 914897 | 151 Words

TetraDigm
Level: 24

POSTS: 21/107
POST EXP: 24659
LVL EXP: 75260
CP: 1972.2
VIZ: 13635

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
personally i am against killing for any reason. i do not judge others based on my personal beliefs however, so i would have to say that so long as the person were already dead, or killed in self defense, there would be nothing wrong with eating them. why let the meat go to waste, just because its the same kind of meat youre made of? youre not eating a person. youre eating a corpse, the same as any time you eat a steak, hamburger, or anything else made of meat. it stopped being a human the moment it died. when something dies, thats it. game over. the body isnt holding some memory inside of it, its just a lifeless body and youd might as well put it to use. strip the flesh for leather, dine on the meat for a few days if their healthy, and grind the bones for fertilizer.
personally i am against killing for any reason. i do not judge others based on my personal beliefs however, so i would have to say that so long as the person were already dead, or killed in self defense, there would be nothing wrong with eating them. why let the meat go to waste, just because its the same kind of meat youre made of? youre not eating a person. youre eating a corpse, the same as any time you eat a steak, hamburger, or anything else made of meat. it stopped being a human the moment it died. when something dies, thats it. game over. the body isnt holding some memory inside of it, its just a lifeless body and youd might as well put it to use. strip the flesh for leather, dine on the meat for a few days if their healthy, and grind the bones for fertilizer.
Member

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 08-26-11
Last Post: 2877 days
Last Active: 1046 days

10-25-13 08:57 PM
sloanstar1000 is Offline
| ID: 914976 | 19 Words

sloanstar1000
Level: 46


POSTS: 143/473
POST EXP: 35513
LVL EXP: 671387
CP: 953.8
VIZ: 204150

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
I've never really put that much thought into cannibalism, now I'm remembering why... I'll stay undecided for the moment.
I've never really put that much thought into cannibalism, now I'm remembering why... I'll stay undecided for the moment.
Member
Destroying pixelated antagonists since 1996


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 08-24-12
Location: SC
Last Post: 3169 days
Last Active: 2175 days

10-25-13 09:02 PM
mourinhosgum is Offline
| ID: 914988 | 41 Words

mourinhosgum
Level: 92


POSTS: 1280/2355
POST EXP: 72922
LVL EXP: 7538160
CP: 2754.0
VIZ: 7839

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
Well it matters in the situation. If it was to survive like your first story then i'm fine with it.
But if it's i'm gonna chop some people up and eat them then it is wrong and they should be punished.
Well it matters in the situation. If it was to survive like your first story then i'm fine with it.
But if it's i'm gonna chop some people up and eat them then it is wrong and they should be punished.
Perma Banned
I'll grapple down that god of fear and throw him into hell's fire


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 05-25-12
Location: canada
Last Post: 3334 days
Last Active: 3329 days

10-25-13 09:09 PM
Mr. Zed is Offline
| ID: 914993 | 101 Words

Mr. Zed
Level: 81


POSTS: 1073/1811
POST EXP: 124151
LVL EXP: 4842928
CP: 2708.7
VIZ: 182711

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
Humans have a natural urge to survive . If you are stranded with no source of food but another human ....... you are going to either eat him or her or be eaten by him or her . Just as how you would kill a wild animal for food if you had to .... you'd kill a human as well .  I am not Saying it is right because I'd probably never be in that situation because I always try to find food if I am hungry enough .  But if someone tried to eat me then I would retaliate . 
Humans have a natural urge to survive . If you are stranded with no source of food but another human ....... you are going to either eat him or her or be eaten by him or her . Just as how you would kill a wild animal for food if you had to .... you'd kill a human as well .  I am not Saying it is right because I'd probably never be in that situation because I always try to find food if I am hungry enough .  But if someone tried to eat me then I would retaliate . 
Trusted Member
Not Important


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 07-01-13
Location: Lost .
Last Post: 2977 days
Last Active: 1312 days

10-25-13 09:13 PM
FFFighterDill is Offline
| ID: 914998 | 107 Words

FFFighterDill
Level: 51


POSTS: 428/572
POST EXP: 18972
LVL EXP: 968676
CP: 411.1
VIZ: 15599

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
I've never put much thought into Cannibalism. But litteraly EATING a person alive is just, CRUEL in my opinion. Even thinking about it make me a little bit sick. In the case of Dudley, like Zephyr said, making a makshift rod isnt that hard (i think). Plus, wouldint they have like a survival box nearby? Rations, anything? Like in the case with the Mansion, ration, ration, RATION. I cant stress it enough, manage the food and youll be FINE. Besides, surviving 3 weeks without food couldint be that hard, unless the body was so used to having a readily availble supply of food it adapted to it.
I've never put much thought into Cannibalism. But litteraly EATING a person alive is just, CRUEL in my opinion. Even thinking about it make me a little bit sick. In the case of Dudley, like Zephyr said, making a makshift rod isnt that hard (i think). Plus, wouldint they have like a survival box nearby? Rations, anything? Like in the case with the Mansion, ration, ration, RATION. I cant stress it enough, manage the food and youll be FINE. Besides, surviving 3 weeks without food couldint be that hard, unless the body was so used to having a readily availble supply of food it adapted to it.
Trusted Member
New Youtuber


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 08-01-10
Location: The Metro
Last Post: 2614 days
Last Active: 4 days

10-25-13 11:18 PM
Oldschool41 is Offline
| ID: 915186 | 80 Words

Oldschool41
Level: 83

POSTS: 1715/1799
POST EXP: 163693
LVL EXP: 5355815
CP: 977.6
VIZ: 17776

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0

FFFighterDill : Well Dudley's case they didn't have any rations or food since their ship was sunk by pirates (if I remember correctly). Also the kid wasn't alive when they ate him (although you could debate that the child was still alive as he was unconscious when they ate him). Not to mention I believe that you can't eat fish out in the middle of the ocean without some sort of decontamination process to get rid of the high salt water.

FFFighterDill : Well Dudley's case they didn't have any rations or food since their ship was sunk by pirates (if I remember correctly). Also the kid wasn't alive when they ate him (although you could debate that the child was still alive as he was unconscious when they ate him). Not to mention I believe that you can't eat fish out in the middle of the ocean without some sort of decontamination process to get rid of the high salt water.
Trusted Member
A wise man speaks because he has something to say. A fool speaks because he has to say something.


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 10-27-10
Last Post: 2799 days
Last Active: 2360 days

10-26-13 08:25 PM
thenumberone is Offline
| ID: 916086 | 53 Words

thenumberone
Level: 143


POSTS: 5709/6365
POST EXP: 365694
LVL EXP: 35111923
CP: 4946.4
VIZ: 329756

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
I dont think that fish would harm them, iv eaten fish Iv caught In the ocean.
Considering that most fisherman live off their catch while at sea that seems unlikely.

Oh and as rcarter said prieviously their is a difference in eating the deceased and rendering them as such to allow the former.
I dont think that fish would harm them, iv eaten fish Iv caught In the ocean.
Considering that most fisherman live off their catch while at sea that seems unlikely.

Oh and as rcarter said prieviously their is a difference in eating the deceased and rendering them as such to allow the former.
Vizzed Elite
Bleeding Heart Liberal


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 03-22-11
Last Post: 3407 days
Last Active: 3407 days

10-27-13 12:39 AM
Vincent1875 is Offline
| ID: 916422 | 20 Words

Vincent1875
Level: 20

POSTS: 40/74
POST EXP: 4990
LVL EXP: 41849
CP: 2682.5
VIZ: 279227

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
Well, my rules would be only eating other people if they die naturally and if there's no other food available.
Well, my rules would be only eating other people if they die naturally and if there's no other food available.
Member

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 06-23-12
Last Post: 2590 days
Last Active: 601 days

10-27-13 02:20 PM
Brigand is Offline
| ID: 916721 | 99 Words

Brigand
Level: 89


POSTS: 1099/2233
POST EXP: 116430
LVL EXP: 6783628
CP: 2057.5
VIZ: 112856

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
If I would be confined in a small space with you for a prolonged time with no idea if we would ever get help and there would be no food I would probably bash your head in, drink your blood and eat you at some point. It is not that  I would want to do but I don't want to pretend to be all high and mighty and to think I would not act like all people do when they are hungry, desperate and have gone a bit crazy. I think it would be in that scenario highly probable.
If I would be confined in a small space with you for a prolonged time with no idea if we would ever get help and there would be no food I would probably bash your head in, drink your blood and eat you at some point. It is not that  I would want to do but I don't want to pretend to be all high and mighty and to think I would not act like all people do when they are hungry, desperate and have gone a bit crazy. I think it would be in that scenario highly probable.
Trusted Member
Not even an enemy.


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 12-29-12
Location: Yurop.
Last Post: 2726 days
Last Active: 2712 days

Links

Page Comments


This page has no comments

Adblocker detected!

Vizzed.com is very expensive to keep alive! The Ads pay for the servers.

Vizzed has 3 TB worth of games and 1 TB worth of music.  This site is free to use but the ads barely pay for the monthly server fees.  If too many more people use ad block, the site cannot survive.

We prioritize the community over the site profits.  This is why we avoid using annoying (but high paying) ads like most other sites which include popups, obnoxious sounds and animations, malware, and other forms of intrusiveness.  We'll do our part to never resort to these types of ads, please do your part by helping support this site by adding Vizzed.com to your ad blocking whitelist.

×