Remove Ad, Sign Up
Register to Remove Ad
Register to Remove Ad
Remove Ad, Sign Up
Register to Remove Ad
Register to Remove Ad
Signup for Free!
-More Features-
-Far Less Ads-
About   Users   Help
Users & Guests Online
On Page: 1
Directory: 109
Entire Site: 9 & 799
Page Staff: pokemon x, pennylessz, Barathemos, tgags123, alexanyways, supercool22, RavusRat,
03-29-24 07:41 AM

Thread Information

Views
891
Replies
4
Rating
0
Status
OPEN
Thread
Creator
Eirinn
05-29-13 10:13 AM
Last
Post
Eirinn
05-29-13 12:48 PM
System
Rating
8.7
Additional Thread Details
Views: 305
Today: 0
Users: 0 unique

Thread Actions

Order
 

Step on up to the lily pads

 
Game's Ratings
Overall
Graphics
Sound
Addictiveness
Depth
Story
Difficulty
Average User Score
8.7
10
6
10
6
N/A
1
Eirinn's Score
8
10
6
10
6
N/A
1

05-29-13 10:13 AM
Eirinn is Offline
| ID: 805913 | 1347 Words

Eirinn
Level: 154


POSTS: 1685/7900
POST EXP: 1300417
LVL EXP: 45892119
CP: 69368.0
VIZ: 1836533

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
Frogs and Flies is a simple, straight forward head to head challenge between the player (who controls the brown frog) and the computer (who controls the red frog), to see who can catch the most flies in about three and a half minutes. You use a directional button to hop from lily pad to lily pad (there are two pads) and press a button to stick your tongue out to try and catch flies while airborn. While this may sound boring when compared to the games we have available today, frogs and flies, as simple as it may be, actually manages to hold it's own in both the fun and addictiveness departments, even against more modern games. After finding this game recently, I was actually rather surprised at it's great quality, as I'd always viewed the Atari 2600 system as having inferior games, and assumed it was because of system limitations. Even the more legendary titles like Space Invaders, and Pac-Man never held my attention, and surely if those games weren't all that entertaining, then no game on this system would be. So when a friend suggested I try Frogs and Flies, I was expecting a mediocre game at best, imagine my surprise then, when I found out it was such a gem of the retro game world. So what exactly is it that makes Frogs and Flies so special? Let's see what the ratings have to say for it.

Graphics: 10/10
Incredible.
For the first time ever, I was "wowed" by the graphics of an Atari 2600 game. I was blown away when I fired this one up, because it pulled some things off that, to my knowledge, no other game on this console ever did. The still shots of this game could never do it justice. The color assortment for an Atari 2600 game is very good, and the frogs, trees, and lily pads are very well done for a game of it's time. Even the frogs' tongues are colored differently than their bodies. Small detail, but it makes a big difference in a game this size. The big surprise? There's a day/night cycle. That's right, when the game starts, it's Morning, and after about thirty seconds, the "lighting" changes, indicating a transition to the next phase of the day. There are seven different phases, with the last one being night time. Each cycle lasts between twenty and forty seconds, and after the night time period, the frogs hop off of the screen, and a golden bug (fly, or possibly a light bug) flies by along with the words "The End". A Day/Night cycle in an Atari 2600 game, I found incredible to say the least. It gives the game a very charming feel, and pulls the player into the experience, far better than simple unchanging scenery would. This may sound simple to modern gamers, but consider the system limitations, along with the fact that these were some of the earliest games, leaving the developers with little to no history to work with when developing a new game.

Sound: 6/10
Good.
Yeah, I may be a little lenient here, but it had about what I would expect from an Atari 2600 game. It has no background music or opening jingle, and only four or five sound effects, but what more do you expect from classic 2600 games? There are some games out there with a wider range of sound effects, and even some with BGM, but those would be more of an exception to the rule, than the "norm". What pushed me to give this game a bump up from five to six, was the cricket sound that plays when the game ends. It's a nice touch, and actually pretty clear for a 2600 game. I wanted to rate this higher, but it would probably be my partiality talking more than anything.

Story: N/A
No story here, as usual with games from this time and on this console. Two frogs are hungry and want to eat all of the flies before the other guy can. The end. Simple enough of a concept, and straight to the point.

Depth: 6/10
Good.
Yeah, hopping back and forth between lily pads and catching flies isn't all that deep, but there's more to it than that. This is a head-to-head competition with the computer to get the most points (each fly is worth two points), rather than just the typical "you versus the world" type approach to games that most Atari 2600 games provided us with. Also the ability to track your progress via score, allows for highscore competitions with a friend. And while the computer likely will not present any challenge to you after the first game or two, it will still impede your progress when going for a highscore, by stealing a fly just before you manage to get it. And yes, I rated the depth up for the day/night cycle. All in all, this game is above average in depth, but not as much as was possible for a 2600 game. Still, above average is a good thing.

Addictiveness: 10/10
Incredible.
Simple or not, I can't get enough of this game. I just keep going back to it, trying to get a higher score than last time. In fact, I've played this game a few times while writing this review, and once I finish the review, I plan to play it again. In a day when games are increasingly complex and in depth (which is a good thing), this is a welcome escape when you want a gaming fix with a simple game from simpler times. Frogs and Flies has become my fallback game when I'm looking for a simple yet fun game to unwind with, and I don't doubt that it will be the same for many of those who play it.

Difficulty: 1/10
Cakewalk.
This is probably the easiest game I've ever played that you can actually lose at. You can lose, but it isn't likely that you will, and if you do, you probably won't lose more than once. The only challenge is timing your jump and when to strike your tounge at a fly. The flies actually follow various patterns, keeping it mixed up, and sometimes they even turn back and fly away from you. But there really is no challenge to speak of. Still, due to the simple yet fun gameplay, and the score counter allowing you to go for personal bests (though there is no highscore table) this game remains addictive and entertaining, even without a challenge from your foe.

Overall: 8/10
Exceptional.
"Professional" rating speaking here. I personally would give this one a nine, but I cannot justify that rating on a review, given all of the pros and cons of the game. But in any case, this game is recommended, personally and "professionally". It has a lot to offer for a game on the 2600, and is likely to keep fans of mini-games coming back to it for quite some time.

To sum it all up, this game is a classic, and is more than worth your time and Viz. It's much better than the name might suggest, and far above the average Atari 2600 game. I highly recommend this one to anyone who is looking for a short and simple game, that manages to deliver plenty of fun while keeping it quick. And while this is what we would consider a mini-game by today's standards, it is still a great game, and it is, in my opinion, the greatest game on the Atari 2600. At the very least, it's one of the greats, and deserves no less recognition than the "giants" of the console, such as the aforementioned Space Invaders or Pac-Man. Frogs and Flies is a timeless classic, that every fan of games of it's time, or mini-games, should try, and it's definitely a must play of the Atari 2600 library. If you're looking for a quick round of simple gaming fun, step on up to the lily pads, my friend. The flies, and red, await.
Frogs and Flies is a simple, straight forward head to head challenge between the player (who controls the brown frog) and the computer (who controls the red frog), to see who can catch the most flies in about three and a half minutes. You use a directional button to hop from lily pad to lily pad (there are two pads) and press a button to stick your tongue out to try and catch flies while airborn. While this may sound boring when compared to the games we have available today, frogs and flies, as simple as it may be, actually manages to hold it's own in both the fun and addictiveness departments, even against more modern games. After finding this game recently, I was actually rather surprised at it's great quality, as I'd always viewed the Atari 2600 system as having inferior games, and assumed it was because of system limitations. Even the more legendary titles like Space Invaders, and Pac-Man never held my attention, and surely if those games weren't all that entertaining, then no game on this system would be. So when a friend suggested I try Frogs and Flies, I was expecting a mediocre game at best, imagine my surprise then, when I found out it was such a gem of the retro game world. So what exactly is it that makes Frogs and Flies so special? Let's see what the ratings have to say for it.

Graphics: 10/10
Incredible.
For the first time ever, I was "wowed" by the graphics of an Atari 2600 game. I was blown away when I fired this one up, because it pulled some things off that, to my knowledge, no other game on this console ever did. The still shots of this game could never do it justice. The color assortment for an Atari 2600 game is very good, and the frogs, trees, and lily pads are very well done for a game of it's time. Even the frogs' tongues are colored differently than their bodies. Small detail, but it makes a big difference in a game this size. The big surprise? There's a day/night cycle. That's right, when the game starts, it's Morning, and after about thirty seconds, the "lighting" changes, indicating a transition to the next phase of the day. There are seven different phases, with the last one being night time. Each cycle lasts between twenty and forty seconds, and after the night time period, the frogs hop off of the screen, and a golden bug (fly, or possibly a light bug) flies by along with the words "The End". A Day/Night cycle in an Atari 2600 game, I found incredible to say the least. It gives the game a very charming feel, and pulls the player into the experience, far better than simple unchanging scenery would. This may sound simple to modern gamers, but consider the system limitations, along with the fact that these were some of the earliest games, leaving the developers with little to no history to work with when developing a new game.

Sound: 6/10
Good.
Yeah, I may be a little lenient here, but it had about what I would expect from an Atari 2600 game. It has no background music or opening jingle, and only four or five sound effects, but what more do you expect from classic 2600 games? There are some games out there with a wider range of sound effects, and even some with BGM, but those would be more of an exception to the rule, than the "norm". What pushed me to give this game a bump up from five to six, was the cricket sound that plays when the game ends. It's a nice touch, and actually pretty clear for a 2600 game. I wanted to rate this higher, but it would probably be my partiality talking more than anything.

Story: N/A
No story here, as usual with games from this time and on this console. Two frogs are hungry and want to eat all of the flies before the other guy can. The end. Simple enough of a concept, and straight to the point.

Depth: 6/10
Good.
Yeah, hopping back and forth between lily pads and catching flies isn't all that deep, but there's more to it than that. This is a head-to-head competition with the computer to get the most points (each fly is worth two points), rather than just the typical "you versus the world" type approach to games that most Atari 2600 games provided us with. Also the ability to track your progress via score, allows for highscore competitions with a friend. And while the computer likely will not present any challenge to you after the first game or two, it will still impede your progress when going for a highscore, by stealing a fly just before you manage to get it. And yes, I rated the depth up for the day/night cycle. All in all, this game is above average in depth, but not as much as was possible for a 2600 game. Still, above average is a good thing.

Addictiveness: 10/10
Incredible.
Simple or not, I can't get enough of this game. I just keep going back to it, trying to get a higher score than last time. In fact, I've played this game a few times while writing this review, and once I finish the review, I plan to play it again. In a day when games are increasingly complex and in depth (which is a good thing), this is a welcome escape when you want a gaming fix with a simple game from simpler times. Frogs and Flies has become my fallback game when I'm looking for a simple yet fun game to unwind with, and I don't doubt that it will be the same for many of those who play it.

Difficulty: 1/10
Cakewalk.
This is probably the easiest game I've ever played that you can actually lose at. You can lose, but it isn't likely that you will, and if you do, you probably won't lose more than once. The only challenge is timing your jump and when to strike your tounge at a fly. The flies actually follow various patterns, keeping it mixed up, and sometimes they even turn back and fly away from you. But there really is no challenge to speak of. Still, due to the simple yet fun gameplay, and the score counter allowing you to go for personal bests (though there is no highscore table) this game remains addictive and entertaining, even without a challenge from your foe.

Overall: 8/10
Exceptional.
"Professional" rating speaking here. I personally would give this one a nine, but I cannot justify that rating on a review, given all of the pros and cons of the game. But in any case, this game is recommended, personally and "professionally". It has a lot to offer for a game on the 2600, and is likely to keep fans of mini-games coming back to it for quite some time.

To sum it all up, this game is a classic, and is more than worth your time and Viz. It's much better than the name might suggest, and far above the average Atari 2600 game. I highly recommend this one to anyone who is looking for a short and simple game, that manages to deliver plenty of fun while keeping it quick. And while this is what we would consider a mini-game by today's standards, it is still a great game, and it is, in my opinion, the greatest game on the Atari 2600. At the very least, it's one of the greats, and deserves no less recognition than the "giants" of the console, such as the aforementioned Space Invaders or Pac-Man. Frogs and Flies is a timeless classic, that every fan of games of it's time, or mini-games, should try, and it's definitely a must play of the Atari 2600 library. If you're looking for a quick round of simple gaming fun, step on up to the lily pads, my friend. The flies, and red, await.
Vizzed Elite
Eirinn


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 07-18-12
Last Post: 2032 days
Last Active: 2032 days

05-29-13 10:31 AM
GenesisJunkie is Offline
| ID: 805921 | 39 Words

GenesisJunkie
Level: 84


POSTS: 612/1975
POST EXP: 136547
LVL EXP: 5581154
CP: 11436.7
VIZ: 91175

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
Awesome review! I love Frogs and Flies as you already know. It is by far my favorite game not only on the Atari 2600 but on any console of this time. Here is you medal, you have earned it!







Image upload: 174x290 totaling 7 KB's.
Awesome review! I love Frogs and Flies as you already know. It is by far my favorite game not only on the Atari 2600 but on any console of this time. Here is you medal, you have earned it!







Image upload: 174x290 totaling 7 KB's.
Vizzed Elite
Vizzeds official Sega addict


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 03-03-13
Location: U.S.
Last Post: 3117 days
Last Active: 2908 days

05-29-13 12:36 PM
Eirinn is Offline
| ID: 805985 | 19 Words

Eirinn
Level: 154


POSTS: 1687/7900
POST EXP: 1300417
LVL EXP: 45892119
CP: 69368.0
VIZ: 1836533

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
GenesisJunkie : Rofl!!! I'm so happy, I got my medal! lol I'll treasure it forever.

Thanks for the feedback.
GenesisJunkie : Rofl!!! I'm so happy, I got my medal! lol I'll treasure it forever.

Thanks for the feedback.
Vizzed Elite
Eirinn


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 07-18-12
Last Post: 2032 days
Last Active: 2032 days

05-29-13 12:41 PM
supercool22 is Offline
| ID: 805989 | 28 Words

supercool22
Level: 125


POSTS: 1865/4933
POST EXP: 182037
LVL EXP: 22283886
CP: 77791.0
VIZ: 4584768

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0

Eirinn : Great review. But
you should put a little more details . Overall its a awesome review . Keep up the good work . Have a great day.

Eirinn : Great review. But
you should put a little more details . Overall its a awesome review . Keep up the good work . Have a great day.
Global Moderator
PC/Steam Manager, Content Adder, Activities Manager
Winter 2024 TDV Winner


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 11-30-12
Last Post: 1 day
Last Active: 5 hours

05-29-13 12:48 PM
Eirinn is Offline
| ID: 805992 | 100 Words

Eirinn
Level: 154


POSTS: 1689/7900
POST EXP: 1300417
LVL EXP: 45892119
CP: 69368.0
VIZ: 1836533

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
supercool22 : Thanks. And I appreciate the constructive criticism. I felt that some of the categories were too short, and actually went back and revised it, adding another four hundred words, but in the end, there really isn't much to say about this game or any game on this console. That's why the required word count for a featured review on the Atari 2600 is lowered from the usual five hundred, to two hundred and fifty.

Still, I don't doubt at all that it could have been better, as you said, and I can appreciate being reminded of that.
supercool22 : Thanks. And I appreciate the constructive criticism. I felt that some of the categories were too short, and actually went back and revised it, adding another four hundred words, but in the end, there really isn't much to say about this game or any game on this console. That's why the required word count for a featured review on the Atari 2600 is lowered from the usual five hundred, to two hundred and fifty.

Still, I don't doubt at all that it could have been better, as you said, and I can appreciate being reminded of that.
Vizzed Elite
Eirinn


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 07-18-12
Last Post: 2032 days
Last Active: 2032 days

Links

Adblocker detected!

Vizzed.com is very expensive to keep alive! The Ads pay for the servers.

Vizzed has 3 TB worth of games and 1 TB worth of music.  This site is free to use but the ads barely pay for the monthly server fees.  If too many more people use ad block, the site cannot survive.

We prioritize the community over the site profits.  This is why we avoid using annoying (but high paying) ads like most other sites which include popups, obnoxious sounds and animations, malware, and other forms of intrusiveness.  We'll do our part to never resort to these types of ads, please do your part by helping support this site by adding Vizzed.com to your ad blocking whitelist.

×