Ah yes, the infamous Cruis'n World. Such an annoying game, yet somehow I can't seem to stop playing it. This is definitely one of those games you just have to play with your friends or pretty much anyone whose is in the vicinity.

The sequel to Cruis'n USA showed great promise as it allowed the player(s) to race against drivers on tracks around the world, instead of just hanging around the US. However, just like the original (and just like any other Cruis'n game), the concept of "catch-up" still applied. This is basically a cap on how a player maintains the lead in a race. For instance, it may seem like you are going to zoom right passed your CPU opponent as you start to creep up on him from behind when, suddenly, your opponent acquires some kind of magical force that propels him foreword just enough for the two of you to be neck and neck. That is, until a sharp turn comes up, and you take this turn just a little too wide causing you to fall behind your opponent by 2 seconds because the CPU can take any turn in the game without slowing down. It's pretty easy to accept this inevitability once you realize that there is no room for error if you want to win. It doesn't matter what car your driving or even how long you maintain the lead, because if you crash your car or drive off the road you, then you should restart the race if you want to finish in first place.  

The game is MUCH more enjoyable to play with friends. Even though you may not come in 1st place, at least you'll have some bragging rights if you beat your friends!

Kruzer : This is a good review, but try splitting it into categories like lets say sound, graphics, addictiveness, story, difficulty, overall etc. Other than that is was a really good game review, and it had lots of depth to it. Keep it up.

Kruzer : You described this game and how it feels to play this game well, but you didn't review the game. You need to make a clear stance on whether what you described shows that this game is a good game or a bad game. Not only that, analyze all parts of the game to back up your conclusion that it is a good game.

Yes, you had an opinion on the game, but you need to split the game into categories and go into more detail in describing them from there, Be detailed and give reasoning for the way you scored the game, be sure to be descriptive in when you are describing the game. Really explain the game and let your opinions, scores and details on the game show how you really felt about it and let it reflect on if it is a good game or not, you have a firm stand point on the game, but you need to go into all parts of the game like the graphics, sound, story and addictiveness and talk about how good they were in the game and how they contribute to your overall scoring of the game. Remember to keep your reviews, detailed and lengthy, preferably in the 500-1000 word range, that shows that you have good detail and reasoning in your review. I hope this helps your future reviews. Keep up the good work and keep making more reviews!