Nice job! I can tell that you really worked hard on this. I like how you gave examples of things like in the graphics and sound. I am going to leave it up to Eirinn and sonicthehedgehog57 if they want to feature it or not. Good job, keep writing great reviews!

Not bad, but you might want to do some work with the formatting of your paragraphs, maybe make them a bit shorter and justify them. Other than that, it's a good review.

awesomeguy279 : That was a very nice & well written review you went into great detail for most of the sections and weren't just continuing to write for your total number of words which I liked and enjoy in a review,  the only thing I may add is when you talked about the difficulty maybe you can give an example from within the game where you had trouble be it with controls or just a certain area. Either way great review and keep up the good work! (also take zanderlex's advice to mind since it will help you out in the long run of things with the justifying part)

It would be hard to review Skyrim in PC because you can modify it so much, graphics, sounds, glitches ....everything. But this was a good review for PS3. Keep up the good work.

Patrick Star : And you have the nerve to criticize my review for Corpse Party 3DS, even though your review here doesn't even explain how the game plays. At least my review for Corpse Party 3DS explained how it played, even though that game doesn't have much gameplay to it. Meanwhile, this review for Skyrim doesn't explain anything about its gameplay, despite there being a lot to it. What's up with that? I'm not saying explain it all, but you could at least do something! And I don't care if the default six category format doesn't have Gameplay, you should seriously add it! To quote what you said about my review for Corpse Party 3DS, "Yes your review is long and has a lot of depth to it but that does not make it good in my eyes." Seriously, without gameplay, a video game is no different than a movie. I have a whole thread dedicated to stressing the importance of this issue (https://www.vizzed.com/boards/thread.php?id=102199).

Overall, though, this review sucks for the same reason just about every other review on this website sucks; simple-minded dialogue, abysmal grammar complete with various capitalization and punctuation issues, and saving the worst for last, no mention of the gameplay at all. You have no real right to judge me, because your video game reviews don't explain gameplay and your grammar is very rushed and overall sloppy and terrible. You're not a hopeless idiot, you just have to seriously remedy these major flaws. Otherwise...

Rayman85 : If you wouldn't go around the website and say that every review sucks, that would be great. We've build this community to be supportive and we accept constructive criticism, but to just go around and attack people for reviews they made 5 years ago, is not within our vision.

I'd also like to mention that the traditional review standard we use doesn't include gameplay, and therefore is no reason to be critical of a review for leaving it out. If you want to include it, fine, but people can review a game as they like and we encourage them to do so. It is their opinion after all.

Barathemos : The traditional review standard doesn't include gameplay? That is unbelievably stupid! How the hell could one leave off the most important part of a video game review!? The fact you said that like it was completely normal is also really messed up! Hell, gameplay is the only thing that makes video games different than movies. Otherwise, we might as well be reviewing movies instead of games. Can you justify not explaining gameplay on a video game review and how that could logically work in any real sense? If sources like IGN or Gamespot didn't explain gameplay in their reviews just like you guys, their reviews would be completely dismissed and would become a source of ridicule alongside giving them as a whole a very bad reputation.

The way it stands now, reviews here are just made to express purely subjective opinions on a games presentation with no regard at all towards the game itself. They don't tell you why it's so fun aside from it's presentation, and in those cases, it's all painfully subjective even for review standards. If someone were to read a review here hoping to know what a game is about, they'd be left completely hopeless. I can't stress enough how important it is to explain gameplay in a video game review! I have a whole thread dedicated to stressing the importance of this issue (https://www.vizzed.com/boards/thread.php?id=102199), and yet fools around here still try to justify excluding the essential category. Some are purely guilty of such acts and they know it, and avoid the thread altogether. It really is that simple, yet the stupid standard here excludes it altogether. Excluding gameplay from a video game review is like removing the patty from a hamburger; the burger would just become bread with condiments and ketchup, and the review would be judging nothing more than a games presentation just like a movie review would. To explain gameplay in a video game review is, in a single word, essential. But is it really that hard?