Remove Ad, Sign Up
Register to Remove Ad
Register to Remove Ad
Remove Ad, Sign Up
Register to Remove Ad
Register to Remove Ad
Signup for Free!
-More Features-
-Far Less Ads-
About   Users   Help
Users & Guests Online
On Page: 1
Directory: 2 & 108
Entire Site: 7 & 844
Page Staff: pokemon x, pennylessz, Barathemos, tgags123, alexanyways, supercool22, RavusRat,
03-28-24 10:55 AM

Forum Links

Related Threads
Coming Soon

Thread Information

Views
3,463
Replies
20
Rating
0
Status
CLOSED
Thread
Creator
bigNATE
02-10-11 08:56 PM
Last
Post
gtwalq
04-22-11 07:11 PM
Additional Thread Details
Views: 661
Today: 0
Users: 0 unique

Thread Actions

Thread Closed
New Thread
New Poll
Order


2 Pages
>>
 

A gaming double standard?

 

02-10-11 08:56 PM
bigNATE is Offline
| ID: 328935 | 216 Words

bigNATE
Level: 117


POSTS: 3237/3938
POST EXP: 201901
LVL EXP: 17811419
CP: 223.3
VIZ: 27229

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
So, I just got my February issue of Game Informer. The top 50 games of 2010 were in it. That's cool, right? Wrong.
You know what I noticed? Extreme prejudice. How?
There were four Wii exclusives I counted in there. Kirby's Epic Yarn, Donkey Kong Country Returns, Super Mario Galaxy 2, and the WiiWare release of Cave Story.
Cave Story got an 8.75 review score.
Kirby's Epic Yarn and Donkey Kong Country Returns got 9.5's
Super Mario Galaxy got a 9.25.
Yet none of the four, despite being highly praised by the reviewers were even in the nominations for Game of the Year.
Game of the Year went to Red Dead Redemption. Granted, it scored 9.75, higher than any of the others. But to not even consider them? Not two games with 9.5?

They claimed to love these games. But they don't show it. It's like Wii review scores only count against other Wii games. It's revolting to Nintendo fans to see their beloved franchises get lauded as amazing games and then forgotten when GotY comes around.

IGN was even worse. They gave SMG2 a perfect 10. Still didn't consider it, still gave GotY to Red Dead. It got a 9.7.

Why? Why can't reviewers consider Wii games? Why must they hold a double standard?

Thoughts?
So, I just got my February issue of Game Informer. The top 50 games of 2010 were in it. That's cool, right? Wrong.
You know what I noticed? Extreme prejudice. How?
There were four Wii exclusives I counted in there. Kirby's Epic Yarn, Donkey Kong Country Returns, Super Mario Galaxy 2, and the WiiWare release of Cave Story.
Cave Story got an 8.75 review score.
Kirby's Epic Yarn and Donkey Kong Country Returns got 9.5's
Super Mario Galaxy got a 9.25.
Yet none of the four, despite being highly praised by the reviewers were even in the nominations for Game of the Year.
Game of the Year went to Red Dead Redemption. Granted, it scored 9.75, higher than any of the others. But to not even consider them? Not two games with 9.5?

They claimed to love these games. But they don't show it. It's like Wii review scores only count against other Wii games. It's revolting to Nintendo fans to see their beloved franchises get lauded as amazing games and then forgotten when GotY comes around.

IGN was even worse. They gave SMG2 a perfect 10. Still didn't consider it, still gave GotY to Red Dead. It got a 9.7.

Why? Why can't reviewers consider Wii games? Why must they hold a double standard?

Thoughts?
Vizzed Elite
Vizzed's resident Jesus Freak
Looks like Teach just got tenure!
Summoner of Slowbro
Fifth Place in February '11 VCS


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 01-06-10
Location: Thulcandra
Last Post: 3116 days
Last Active: 2012 days

(edited by bigNATE on 02-10-11 08:58 PM)    

02-10-11 09:03 PM
Nksor is Offline
| ID: 328938 | 32 Words

Nksor
the_casualty
Level: 138


POSTS: 3091/5856
POST EXP: 228223
LVL EXP: 31459862
CP: 1171.6
VIZ: 131963

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
Obvious: companies pay the big-shot review websites/magazines to win/be mentioned as game of the year. Easy advertising.

Either that, or all of the companies must have a big grudge against Nintendo.
Obvious: companies pay the big-shot review websites/magazines to win/be mentioned as game of the year. Easy advertising.

Either that, or all of the companies must have a big grudge against Nintendo.
Vizzed Elite
Timecube


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 09-30-10
Location: From:
Last Post: 2426 days
Last Active: 1016 days

02-10-11 09:06 PM
bigNATE is Offline
| ID: 328943 | 43 Words

bigNATE
Level: 117


POSTS: 3240/3938
POST EXP: 201901
LVL EXP: 17811419
CP: 223.3
VIZ: 27229

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
the_casualty : I'm really hoping it's the latter, honestly . Although the way the editors complained on podcast about Red Dead getting it at the VGA's and then it was the staff pick at the magazine is totally not fishy at all...
[/sarcasm]
the_casualty : I'm really hoping it's the latter, honestly . Although the way the editors complained on podcast about Red Dead getting it at the VGA's and then it was the staff pick at the magazine is totally not fishy at all...
[/sarcasm]
Vizzed Elite
Vizzed's resident Jesus Freak
Looks like Teach just got tenure!
Summoner of Slowbro
Fifth Place in February '11 VCS


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 01-06-10
Location: Thulcandra
Last Post: 3116 days
Last Active: 2012 days

02-10-11 09:11 PM
legacyme3 is Offline
| ID: 328949 | 85 Words

legacyme3
Lord Leggy - King of IT
Level: 268


POSTS: 2753/27250
POST EXP: 2003421
LVL EXP: 316288815
CP: 42531.1
VIZ: 2982476

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
It's obvious. The Wii and it's exclusives are just not very good. The MAIN problem with wii games is that they are mostly for 13 year olds and that age range. The reviewers are adults and they find the more interesting games to be the ones on the other consoles.

I looked at my game informer and was very pleased myself, because I felt they got it right. But then again, I am also in the PS3 diehard group and dislike the Wii the most.
It's obvious. The Wii and it's exclusives are just not very good. The MAIN problem with wii games is that they are mostly for 13 year olds and that age range. The reviewers are adults and they find the more interesting games to be the ones on the other consoles.

I looked at my game informer and was very pleased myself, because I felt they got it right. But then again, I am also in the PS3 diehard group and dislike the Wii the most.
Vizzed Elite
6-Time VCS Winner

One Leggy.
One Love.
One Dream.


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 09-14-10
Location: https://discord.gg/YCuUJz9
Last Post: 1290 days
Last Active: 1290 days

02-10-11 09:14 PM
bigNATE is Offline
| ID: 328953 | 80 Words

bigNATE
Level: 117


POSTS: 3241/3938
POST EXP: 201901
LVL EXP: 17811419
CP: 223.3
VIZ: 27229

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
legacyme3 : But if that were the case I wouldn't have a problem. The problem is that they DO enjoy these games, DO give them good scores, and DO call them amazing and recommend you buy them. It's not that they don't like them, it's that they ignore them when the time comes for GotY. They treat the Wii like a whole different class for that one vote a year, and then call it equal the rest of the time.
legacyme3 : But if that were the case I wouldn't have a problem. The problem is that they DO enjoy these games, DO give them good scores, and DO call them amazing and recommend you buy them. It's not that they don't like them, it's that they ignore them when the time comes for GotY. They treat the Wii like a whole different class for that one vote a year, and then call it equal the rest of the time.
Vizzed Elite
Vizzed's resident Jesus Freak
Looks like Teach just got tenure!
Summoner of Slowbro
Fifth Place in February '11 VCS


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 01-06-10
Location: Thulcandra
Last Post: 3116 days
Last Active: 2012 days

02-10-11 09:27 PM
legacyme3 is Offline
| ID: 328968 | 76 Words

legacyme3
Lord Leggy - King of IT
Level: 268


POSTS: 2754/27250
POST EXP: 2003421
LVL EXP: 316288815
CP: 42531.1
VIZ: 2982476

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
bigNATE :

Well, here's my take.

For a WII game it is great. So they rate it high because really, a 10 rated Wii game does not equal a 10 rated PS3 game because of the abilities and the uses of those systems.

A wii game that scored a 9 is like an 8 on the PS3.

I personally would put Kirby's Epic Yarn at number 5 at best. Even though it was a good game.
bigNATE :

Well, here's my take.

For a WII game it is great. So they rate it high because really, a 10 rated Wii game does not equal a 10 rated PS3 game because of the abilities and the uses of those systems.

A wii game that scored a 9 is like an 8 on the PS3.

I personally would put Kirby's Epic Yarn at number 5 at best. Even though it was a good game.
Vizzed Elite
6-Time VCS Winner

One Leggy.
One Love.
One Dream.


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 09-14-10
Location: https://discord.gg/YCuUJz9
Last Post: 1290 days
Last Active: 1290 days

02-10-11 10:27 PM
Sephitard9001 is Offline
| ID: 329039 | 60 Words

Sephitard9001
Level: 46


POSTS: 32/471
POST EXP: 27507
LVL EXP: 708614
CP: 703.1
VIZ: 66763

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
The Wii games seem to be "lower tier" no offense, to reviewers. If Kirby got a 9.5 and then a triple A title got a 9.5, the triple A title is going to be "above" Kirby. The Wii can't quite produce high enough technical games that are on par with Xbox/PS3. In other words, their judged on a different scale.
The Wii games seem to be "lower tier" no offense, to reviewers. If Kirby got a 9.5 and then a triple A title got a 9.5, the triple A title is going to be "above" Kirby. The Wii can't quite produce high enough technical games that are on par with Xbox/PS3. In other words, their judged on a different scale.
Trusted Member
Make love against the evils!


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 01-30-11
Location: AMERICA
Last Post: 3409 days
Last Active: 132 days

02-11-11 08:37 AM
bigNATE is Offline
| ID: 329272 | 308 Words

bigNATE
Level: 117


POSTS: 3255/3938
POST EXP: 201901
LVL EXP: 17811419
CP: 223.3
VIZ: 27229

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
That's honestly the most shallow argument that could be used.

The Wii's lack in power is only that it can't produce HD graphics. That's it. It has no limitation on being able to play great games, only on making them look realistic. But that can be circumvented with creative art styles like in Kirby's Epic Yarn. Saying that they should be counted as lower ratings merely because the graphics aren't HD is like saying a car is terrible because it doesn't look as good as another. Say this car actually drives better than the other, and all test-drivers ranked it higher than the other. That's like IGN's case with SMG2 and RDR. Does the fact that the first car doesn't look as pretty mean it should be ranked lower? People like to drive good-looking cars. People like to play games with great graphics. But if the uglier car drives better and the non-HD game is more fun to play, then why should they be taken down in ratings because their visual limitations? The reviewer's job is to tell you if a game is fun to play; if the graphics don't hinder the experience, or maybe on the flipside if the graphics don't make the game that much more fun, then they really should count very little towards the overall score. Sure, some people may not like the SD engines and are strictly HD, but that's not what reviewers are for; they're there to say if the games were fun. And they do. Ranking them lower because they still look great, just not as great as other games out there (don't deny that the Galaxy games are beautiful), is shallow and prejudiced. Are we really that shallow as people? Cause if we are, I'm sticking to my Nintendo games and my friends who enjoy them thank you very much.
That's honestly the most shallow argument that could be used.

The Wii's lack in power is only that it can't produce HD graphics. That's it. It has no limitation on being able to play great games, only on making them look realistic. But that can be circumvented with creative art styles like in Kirby's Epic Yarn. Saying that they should be counted as lower ratings merely because the graphics aren't HD is like saying a car is terrible because it doesn't look as good as another. Say this car actually drives better than the other, and all test-drivers ranked it higher than the other. That's like IGN's case with SMG2 and RDR. Does the fact that the first car doesn't look as pretty mean it should be ranked lower? People like to drive good-looking cars. People like to play games with great graphics. But if the uglier car drives better and the non-HD game is more fun to play, then why should they be taken down in ratings because their visual limitations? The reviewer's job is to tell you if a game is fun to play; if the graphics don't hinder the experience, or maybe on the flipside if the graphics don't make the game that much more fun, then they really should count very little towards the overall score. Sure, some people may not like the SD engines and are strictly HD, but that's not what reviewers are for; they're there to say if the games were fun. And they do. Ranking them lower because they still look great, just not as great as other games out there (don't deny that the Galaxy games are beautiful), is shallow and prejudiced. Are we really that shallow as people? Cause if we are, I'm sticking to my Nintendo games and my friends who enjoy them thank you very much.
Vizzed Elite
Vizzed's resident Jesus Freak
Looks like Teach just got tenure!
Summoner of Slowbro
Fifth Place in February '11 VCS


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 01-06-10
Location: Thulcandra
Last Post: 3116 days
Last Active: 2012 days

03-28-11 08:05 PM
kyuremu is Offline
| ID: 356575 | 96 Words

kyuremu
Level: 68


POSTS: 173/1121
POST EXP: 27760
LVL EXP: 2594795
CP: 321.6
VIZ: 46452

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
you know i remember that issue and i was pissed too.
its just the standard nintendo has let itself get into
i myself being a nintendo fanboy, know that the wii isn't a graphics badass but nintendo realized a long time ago that if they sacrificed graphics for gameplay it'd be a winner
i mean aside from the main series of nintendo games you see the difference in quality
enough ranting moral of the story we as nintendo fans have accepted what games we already expect to be good and we know which ones will fail
you know i remember that issue and i was pissed too.
its just the standard nintendo has let itself get into
i myself being a nintendo fanboy, know that the wii isn't a graphics badass but nintendo realized a long time ago that if they sacrificed graphics for gameplay it'd be a winner
i mean aside from the main series of nintendo games you see the difference in quality
enough ranting moral of the story we as nintendo fans have accepted what games we already expect to be good and we know which ones will fail
Trusted Member
Grotesque Pixels Logos Owner


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 02-25-11
Location: NM
Last Post: 3323 days
Last Active: 864 days

03-29-11 04:33 PM
iceycold724 is Offline
| ID: 357094 | 99 Words

iceycold724
Level: 41


POSTS: 262/354
POST EXP: 18202
LVL EXP: 460275
CP: 4.0
VIZ: 12647

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
I think that Nintendo makes a lot of really awesome games, it's just that the game reviewers probably don't really like Nintendo all that much. With Nintendo, it seems to be that you're either a fan or not, and to be honest, I'm not a fan. If I'd decided those results, they probably would've come out the same. I'm not saying this is right, though, the process is definitely flawed. Instead, a team of reviewers that all have different tastes should be deciding. That way, while the results may not be what everyone wants, they'll at least be fair.
I think that Nintendo makes a lot of really awesome games, it's just that the game reviewers probably don't really like Nintendo all that much. With Nintendo, it seems to be that you're either a fan or not, and to be honest, I'm not a fan. If I'd decided those results, they probably would've come out the same. I'm not saying this is right, though, the process is definitely flawed. Instead, a team of reviewers that all have different tastes should be deciding. That way, while the results may not be what everyone wants, they'll at least be fair.
Member
the coolest of the cold


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 03-01-11
Location: New Jersey
Last Post: 4671 days
Last Active: 838 days

04-09-11 01:24 PM
billythekidmonster is Offline
| ID: 364758 | 89 Words

Level: 129


POSTS: 1798/4999
POST EXP: 206588
LVL EXP: 24924526
CP: 397.6
VIZ: 96951

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
Totally agree. Reviewers love the wii games and then when it comes time to say the best of the best they don't want to even point it out! Next they will probably just take out the best game of the year on wii because they have some grudge because of Nintendo's monopoly over the industry. At this rate I kind of don't blame them, they could release total junk (ie. Lumberjack Games) and people would still buy that crap.

PS I know that lumberjack games is not nintendo made.
Totally agree. Reviewers love the wii games and then when it comes time to say the best of the best they don't want to even point it out! Next they will probably just take out the best game of the year on wii because they have some grudge because of Nintendo's monopoly over the industry. At this rate I kind of don't blame them, they could release total junk (ie. Lumberjack Games) and people would still buy that crap.

PS I know that lumberjack games is not nintendo made.
Member
3rd place in the August 2011 VCS! I got 3rd place in the October 2010 VCS! 3DS friend code 1762-2680-4239 pm me yours


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 08-16-10
Last Post: 4481 days
Last Active: 4203 days

04-09-11 01:32 PM
pacman1755 (old) is Offline
| ID: 364759 | 20 Words

Level: 66


POSTS: 788/1044
POST EXP: 21370
LVL EXP: 2350337
CP: 35.4
VIZ: 3131

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
Yeah, they say that they like it, but give it a not good review about it, not good at all.
Yeah, they say that they like it, but give it a not good review about it, not good at all.
Trusted Member
Pacman1755's Original Account. Unresponsive.


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 12-12-10
Location: Wisconsin
Last Post: 4632 days
Last Active: 3305 days

04-12-11 01:08 PM
TheOmegaDragon is Offline
| ID: 366904 | 60 Words

TheOmegaDragon
Level: 59


POSTS: 629/792
POST EXP: 27623
LVL EXP: 1578570
CP: 973.8
VIZ: 74571

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
It is kinda of prejudice to overlook Wii games just because they are for younger or casual gamers. Wii games are excellent despite what it lacks compared to the PS3 and Xbox360 in graphics and such. If you think about it parents of young children support Nintendo maybe there wasn't enough votes for the Wii games to receive the award.
It is kinda of prejudice to overlook Wii games just because they are for younger or casual gamers. Wii games are excellent despite what it lacks compared to the PS3 and Xbox360 in graphics and such. If you think about it parents of young children support Nintendo maybe there wasn't enough votes for the Wii games to receive the award.
Trusted Member

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 07-04-10
Last Post: 3305 days
Last Active: 1914 days

04-13-11 12:11 PM
numba1packfan is Offline
| ID: 367524 | 108 Words

numba1packfan
Level: 19


POSTS: 29/60
POST EXP: 2653
LVL EXP: 32000
CP: 0.0
VIZ: 2425

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
Ya it sounds like a double standard. Graphics don't make or break a game. Thats why im on the retro game room playing old games is because the games are just better. The new games lack so much when it comes to replay value. Ya they look amazing i agree with you but thats not what makes a game great. One of my favorite games of all time Zelda Ocarina of time can't compare to Uncharted on the PS3 when it comes to graphics, but the gameplay and story, and great characters makes this game in my opinion better. They need to rate games on gameplay not looks.
Ya it sounds like a double standard. Graphics don't make or break a game. Thats why im on the retro game room playing old games is because the games are just better. The new games lack so much when it comes to replay value. Ya they look amazing i agree with you but thats not what makes a game great. One of my favorite games of all time Zelda Ocarina of time can't compare to Uncharted on the PS3 when it comes to graphics, but the gameplay and story, and great characters makes this game in my opinion better. They need to rate games on gameplay not looks.
Member

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 04-05-11
Location: California
Last Post: 4720 days
Last Active: 4541 days

04-13-11 01:29 PM
epic-san is Offline
| ID: 367571 | 14 Words

epic-san
Level: 95


POSTS: 762/2459
POST EXP: 76050
LVL EXP: 8451372
CP: 880.4
VIZ: 47989

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0


Gameinformer doesn't give Nintendo much credit... Nintendo Power is better at choosing Wii games.


Gameinformer doesn't give Nintendo much credit... Nintendo Power is better at choosing Wii games.
Trusted Member
Hit O.P.S. syndrome on 4/2/11 at 5:14 p.m.


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 02-01-11
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow, where Hydreigons fly
Last Post: 1845 days
Last Active: 1839 days

04-13-11 02:42 PM
dkmec20 is Offline
| ID: 367618 | 82 Words

dkmec20
Level: 95


POSTS: 1080/2498
POST EXP: 62177
LVL EXP: 8613403
CP: 559.5
VIZ: 35322

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
It's probably because Xbox 360 and PS3 games have better graphics. I too think that Wii games should be considered for GotY but it's just that the reviewers probably think that the Wii is just a kid's console. I agree with iceycold on this one, they should hire reviewers with different tastes for games. Then Wii games might be considered. But more people play Xbox/Playstation games more and for that matter Wii games seem like a different league than the Xbox/Playstation games.
It's probably because Xbox 360 and PS3 games have better graphics. I too think that Wii games should be considered for GotY but it's just that the reviewers probably think that the Wii is just a kid's console. I agree with iceycold on this one, they should hire reviewers with different tastes for games. Then Wii games might be considered. But more people play Xbox/Playstation games more and for that matter Wii games seem like a different league than the Xbox/Playstation games.
Trusted Member
Phil. 3:7-11


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 03-17-11
Location: KY, USA
Last Post: 55 days
Last Active: 43 days

04-19-11 11:53 AM
Bobbynibbles is Offline
| ID: 371341 | 71 Words

Bobbynibbles
Level: 56


POSTS: 510/706
POST EXP: 33365
LVL EXP: 1340133
CP: 6.7
VIZ: 683

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
I think the WII just doesn't have games that are as deep or as "good" as its competitors. I don't think it is the graphics as much as the games themselves. I played all three of the games you mentioned for the Wii and they weren't as good as games for the PS2... The mentioned Wii games just do not have the level of story needed for a truly great game.
I think the WII just doesn't have games that are as deep or as "good" as its competitors. I don't think it is the graphics as much as the games themselves. I played all three of the games you mentioned for the Wii and they weren't as good as games for the PS2... The mentioned Wii games just do not have the level of story needed for a truly great game.
Perma Banned
Who are you to wave your finger? So full of it Eye balls deep in muddy waters F**kin' hypocrite


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 04-07-10
Location: Florida
Last Post: 4623 days
Last Active: 4622 days

04-21-11 06:12 PM
mdynasty926 is Offline
| ID: 372909 | 222 Words

mdynasty926
Level: 69


POSTS: 1045/1119
POST EXP: 111867
LVL EXP: 2741166
CP: 359.7
VIZ: 3339

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
Though I do think the Wii is just getting abuse from most people, I think you have the wrong idea.

When reviewers from those press companies and such make reviews, they don't all review the game and give it a score, they hand it to one person to give their opinion and write a review. The person can be incredibly fair or biased, but that's just his or her opinion. When GotY comes around, I'm sure they don't just take the review score into account, but have the entire staff of reviewers and people vote and give the rankings. So they probably don't even consider the review scores that much at all.

Don't get me wrong, some of those Wii games should've been even nominated. I'm playing SMG2 right now and it's a wonderful game. But I'm just letting you know how they'd probably work, and why the review scores don't seem to match up with their own rankings. Not that it's perfect, but that's just how it is for them I guess.

It's got nothing to do with the fact that Wii games "seem lesser" than the games nominated. Lots of people are saying that and I'm utterly annoyed by the fact that they would say stuff like that even though Nintendo is practically the reason people play video games today.
Though I do think the Wii is just getting abuse from most people, I think you have the wrong idea.

When reviewers from those press companies and such make reviews, they don't all review the game and give it a score, they hand it to one person to give their opinion and write a review. The person can be incredibly fair or biased, but that's just his or her opinion. When GotY comes around, I'm sure they don't just take the review score into account, but have the entire staff of reviewers and people vote and give the rankings. So they probably don't even consider the review scores that much at all.

Don't get me wrong, some of those Wii games should've been even nominated. I'm playing SMG2 right now and it's a wonderful game. But I'm just letting you know how they'd probably work, and why the review scores don't seem to match up with their own rankings. Not that it's perfect, but that's just how it is for them I guess.

It's got nothing to do with the fact that Wii games "seem lesser" than the games nominated. Lots of people are saying that and I'm utterly annoyed by the fact that they would say stuff like that even though Nintendo is practically the reason people play video games today.
Trusted Member

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 07-22-09
Last Post: 3370 days
Last Active: 2396 days

04-21-11 06:40 PM
DARKANINE is Offline
| ID: 372944 | 32 Words

DARKANINE
Level: 88


POSTS: 540/2060
POST EXP: 54319
LVL EXP: 6521835
CP: 669.4
VIZ: 18383

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
legacyme3 : The MAIN problem with wii games is that they are mostly for 13 year olds and that age range...you should play no more heroes,no more heroes 2 and mad world
legacyme3 : The MAIN problem with wii games is that they are mostly for 13 year olds and that age range...you should play no more heroes,no more heroes 2 and mad world
Trusted Member
Come along with me, to the butterflies and bees...


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 12-01-10
Location: North Carolina
Last Post: 2564 days
Last Active: 2564 days

04-22-11 03:54 PM
Bobbynibbles is Offline
| ID: 373457 | 16 Words

Bobbynibbles
Level: 56


POSTS: 514/706
POST EXP: 33365
LVL EXP: 1340133
CP: 6.7
VIZ: 683

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
Those games are far from the normal game made for the Wii and you know it.
Those games are far from the normal game made for the Wii and you know it.
Perma Banned
Who are you to wave your finger? So full of it Eye balls deep in muddy waters F**kin' hypocrite


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 04-07-10
Location: Florida
Last Post: 4623 days
Last Active: 4622 days

Links

Page Comments


This page has no comments

Adblocker detected!

Vizzed.com is very expensive to keep alive! The Ads pay for the servers.

Vizzed has 3 TB worth of games and 1 TB worth of music.  This site is free to use but the ads barely pay for the monthly server fees.  If too many more people use ad block, the site cannot survive.

We prioritize the community over the site profits.  This is why we avoid using annoying (but high paying) ads like most other sites which include popups, obnoxious sounds and animations, malware, and other forms of intrusiveness.  We'll do our part to never resort to these types of ads, please do your part by helping support this site by adding Vizzed.com to your ad blocking whitelist.

×