OmegaVenomous : Quoting something you said: "Now, while typing this, I am using a Chromebook, and I have downloaded some stuff, no viruses.". Let's reflect on that for a bit. Of course, using a Chromebook makes you immune to viruses... Windows viruses. Not wanting to play the devil's advocate, as I use Linux as well (Chrome OS is a Linux distro, I just can't recall if it's based on top of another distro or if it's built from scratch), but no OS is 100% safe. Of course, Linux has way less chance of being infected by a virus, but that's due to three main points: 1. Lack of market share (Windows has a whopping 90%, which I hope will change in the future as more and more people will get fed up with Windows 10),
2. Windows viruses literally don't work at all on Linux due to binaries, it's like writing a letter in Greek and asking for a Japanese person to read it (I'll get a bit "nerdy" here - suppose you have a virus which deletes your "C:Program Files" in Windows. It won't work on Linux since it has a completely different filesystem from Windows, there's not a "Program Files" in there, and also because the commands written are specific to the Windows kernel, or "infrastructure" if you prefer. Same thing if you write a virus for Linux and try to run it in Windows), and
3. Linux is already, in a certain point-of-view, kid-proof: everything you install from the repositories is tested and safe, and even if you downloaded something which isn't in the repositories, it always asks you your password, so you have complete control of what you're doing. It's just hard to find a program that might actually have a virus, and if someone finds one, they'll just remove it pronto, due to Linux's (and most of its programs') open-source nature.Then, again, devil's advocate: Linux is not 100% safe, it's just not being targeted as Windows is. Yet I doubt it would succumb to the same problems if it was targeted like that, especially due to reason number 3. By the way, another quote: "The reason is the virus protection is bad and most people that use Windows are idiots.". I agree with the latter but disagree with the former. There are good Windows anti-viruses out there, I used to use Avast! back in the day, but there are others such as AVG, Norton, BitDefender, Malwarebytes, HitmanPRO, etc., but I just can't recommend Windows Defender. Stock features are generally "biased" IMO. I also don't really count Mac since I never met one single person using a Mac where I live (these things are expensive as hell, although there's a lot of people who use iPhones here), but modern Macs are based in the same architecture Linux has - UNIX, which also makes it, theoretically, invulnerable to viruses. I said theoretically because, in the past, there was an episode where several Macs got infected with a trojan named Flashback.But that doesn't mean there aren't anti-viruses for both. I think Mac has Norton, and Linux has ClamAV, which also scans for Windows viruses (in case you need to run something via WINE/PlayOnLinux). It all boils down to preventing your kiddos from downloading pirated Minecraft copies Either way, I feel your rant, man. That was one of the reasons I got fed up with Microsoft and went to Linux (actually that wasn't even a big one, it was just an annoyance long forgotten after I changed OS). OmegaVenomous : Quoting something you said: "Now, while typing this, I am using a Chromebook, and I have downloaded some stuff, no viruses.". Let's reflect on that for a bit.
Of course, using a Chromebook makes you immune to viruses... Windows viruses. Not wanting to play the devil's advocate, as I use Linux as well (Chrome OS is a Linux distro, I just can't recall if it's based on top of another distro or if it's built from scratch), but no OS is 100% safe. Of course, Linux has way less chance of being infected by a virus, but that's due to three main points:
1. Lack of market share (Windows has a whopping 90%, which I hope will change in the future as more and more people will get fed up with Windows 10),
2. Windows viruses literally don't work at all on Linux due to binaries, it's like writing a letter in Greek and asking for a Japanese person to read it (I'll get a bit "nerdy" here - suppose you have a virus which deletes your "C:Program Files" in Windows. It won't work on Linux since it has a completely different filesystem from Windows, there's not a "Program Files" in there, and also because the commands written are specific to the Windows kernel, or "infrastructure" if you prefer. Same thing if you write a virus for Linux and try to run it in Windows), and
3. Linux is already, in a certain point-of-view, kid-proof: everything you install from the repositories is tested and safe, and even if you downloaded something which isn't in the repositories, it always asks you your password, so you have complete control of what you're doing. It's just hard to find a program that might actually have a virus, and if someone finds one, they'll just remove it pronto, due to Linux's (and most of its programs') open-source nature.
Then, again, devil's advocate: Linux is not 100% safe, it's just not being targeted as Windows is. Yet I doubt it would succumb to the same problems if it was targeted like that, especially due to reason number 3.
By the way, another quote: "The reason is the virus protection is bad and most people that use Windows are idiots.". I agree with the latter but disagree with the former. There are good Windows anti-viruses out there, I used to use Avast! back in the day, but there are others such as AVG, Norton, BitDefender, Malwarebytes, HitmanPRO, etc., but I just can't recommend Windows Defender. Stock features are generally "biased" IMO.
I also don't really count Mac since I never met one single person using a Mac where I live (these things are expensive as hell, although there's a lot of people who use iPhones here), but modern Macs are based in the same architecture Linux has - UNIX, which also makes it, theoretically, invulnerable to viruses. I said theoretically because, in the past, there was an episode where several Macs got infected with a trojan named Flashback.
But that doesn't mean there aren't anti-viruses for both. I think Mac has Norton, and Linux has ClamAV, which also scans for Windows viruses (in case you need to run something via WINE/PlayOnLinux). It all boils down to preventing your kiddos from downloading pirated Minecraft copies
Either way, I feel your rant, man. That was one of the reasons I got fed up with Microsoft and went to Linux (actually that wasn't even a big one, it was just an annoyance long forgotten after I changed OS). |