Remove Ad, Sign Up
Register to Remove Ad
Register to Remove Ad
Remove Ad, Sign Up
Register to Remove Ad
Register to Remove Ad
Signup for Free!
-More Features-
-Far Less Ads-
About   Users   Help
Users & Guests Online
On Page: 1
Directory: 93
Entire Site: 4 & 855
Page Staff: pennylessz, pokemon x, Barathemos, tgags123, alexanyways, RavusRat,
03-29-24 08:34 AM

Thread Information

Views
3,310
Replies
20
Rating
2
Status
CLOSED
Thread
Creator
Mistress
11-11-13 10:39 PM
Last
Post
Bintsy
12-18-13 05:57 AM
Additional Thread Details
Views: 989
Today: 0
Users: 0 unique

Thread Actions

Thread Closed
New Thread
New Poll
Order


2 Pages
>>
 

Should death row inmates be guinea pigs to medical testing rather than animals?

 

11-11-13 10:39 PM
Mistress is Offline
| ID: 926218 | 99 Words

Mistress
Level: 79


POSTS: 639/1717
POST EXP: 132920
LVL EXP: 4458419
CP: 7444.1
VIZ: 195379

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
As the title states, "Should death row inmates be subjected to medical testing rather than animals?"

This is my topic for an essay I'm supposed to do in English class. While I haven't done any research yet, I would like to inquire what Vizzed members think of this statement. I'll accept biased opinions, but I need to know why you stated your opinions.

As for myself, I'm against it. It's probably because my mind tends to lean on the more humane answer, but who knows? Maybe I just might change my mind after I've done some research on it.
As the title states, "Should death row inmates be subjected to medical testing rather than animals?"

This is my topic for an essay I'm supposed to do in English class. While I haven't done any research yet, I would like to inquire what Vizzed members think of this statement. I'll accept biased opinions, but I need to know why you stated your opinions.

As for myself, I'm against it. It's probably because my mind tends to lean on the more humane answer, but who knows? Maybe I just might change my mind after I've done some research on it.
Vizzed Elite

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 06-28-13
Last Post: 3352 days
Last Active: 3196 days

11-11-13 10:50 PM
Mr. Zed is Offline
| ID: 926221 | 105 Words

Mr. Zed
Level: 81


POSTS: 1327/1811
POST EXP: 124151
LVL EXP: 4827482
CP: 2708.7
VIZ: 182711

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
Mistress : Well not really . I mean they were sentenced to death .. for doing something worth dying ( not in a noble way  for .  They are put to death BECAUSE the the world would be a better place without them ... why study them or conduct experiments on them ? That will just give them more opportunity to ruin what they already haven't  

And I might be being totally paranoid here but what if one of the experiments go wrong and make the inmate ... better .. physically .. make them more powerful ... then that would really be a problem  
Mistress : Well not really . I mean they were sentenced to death .. for doing something worth dying ( not in a noble way  for .  They are put to death BECAUSE the the world would be a better place without them ... why study them or conduct experiments on them ? That will just give them more opportunity to ruin what they already haven't  

And I might be being totally paranoid here but what if one of the experiments go wrong and make the inmate ... better .. physically .. make them more powerful ... then that would really be a problem  
Trusted Member
Not Important


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 07-01-13
Location: Lost .
Last Post: 2952 days
Last Active: 1287 days

11-11-13 11:04 PM
Uzar is Offline
| ID: 926223 | 71 Words

Uzar
A user of this
Level: 139


POSTS: 1128/6433
POST EXP: 345123
LVL EXP: 32435365
CP: 25933.5
VIZ: 555693

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
I would say so. I mean, to get on death row you had to have done something especially evil. I say yes, we should. And the results would be more accurate since you're using a human and not an animal. Sure it may be cruel to them. But their crimes against their fellow man are something to not be forgotten, and were likely much worse than what they're being put through.
I would say so. I mean, to get on death row you had to have done something especially evil. I say yes, we should. And the results would be more accurate since you're using a human and not an animal. Sure it may be cruel to them. But their crimes against their fellow man are something to not be forgotten, and were likely much worse than what they're being put through.
Vizzed Elite
I wonder what the character limit on this thing is.


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 06-03-13
Location: Airship Bostonius
Last Post: 1879 days
Last Active: 1850 days

11-11-13 11:15 PM
Sidewinder is Offline
| ID: 926230 | 395 Words

Sidewinder
Level: 65


POSTS: 966/1093
POST EXP: 110877
LVL EXP: 2251952
CP: 4575.8
VIZ: 50810

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
That's a pretty deep essay question...I love it! (for those who know me...)

Anyway, it really is hard to choose a side, so I'll state some reason for both. 

YES

-People on Death Row...deserve it, don't they? They have committed a crime that has landed them on Death's Row, so really, why not? 
-If the person on Death Row
chooses to oblige, then it's their choice. One might say it's a "noble" cause. Death is death, no matter which way it happens. Either by means of Death Row, or means to medical testing and other outside options. As for noble cause, maybe that person would like to maybe help out society before leaving it forever. The tests would be carried out on a human, which would then make things a little more accurate. 

NO

-As you stated, it's an idea of a humane decision. That person is still a human, and shouldn't be subjected to possible humiliation. I feel this idea of being humane will have a tremendous tug on the rope, more in favor of NO. No one wants to be subjected to life-altering experiments against their will. 

Going with what Mr. Zed said, I would kindly disagree. 

"They are put to death BECAUSE the the world would be a better place without them ... why study them or conduct experiments on them ? That will just give them more opportunity to ruin what they already haven't."

They are going to die in the end...would it matter in what way they may die? And I do not see how they may ruin already what they haven't. Not everyone on Death Row is going to be that menacing guy or gal. Many regret their decisions, and end up becoming humble and accepting the consequences to their actions. They do not have a chance to ruin anything they already haven't while in jail too.
I do not think that there will be a problem with experiments going wrong...those are only for movies. 

I must say, I am in the middle. There is no option for being in the middle for your essay (I presume), so I am glad I am not assigned that essay. Jk lol. I would have to think a little more about this, but the humane part is really tugging my chains and pulling me over to NO...

Good luck with your essay.
That's a pretty deep essay question...I love it! (for those who know me...)

Anyway, it really is hard to choose a side, so I'll state some reason for both. 

YES

-People on Death Row...deserve it, don't they? They have committed a crime that has landed them on Death's Row, so really, why not? 
-If the person on Death Row
chooses to oblige, then it's their choice. One might say it's a "noble" cause. Death is death, no matter which way it happens. Either by means of Death Row, or means to medical testing and other outside options. As for noble cause, maybe that person would like to maybe help out society before leaving it forever. The tests would be carried out on a human, which would then make things a little more accurate. 

NO

-As you stated, it's an idea of a humane decision. That person is still a human, and shouldn't be subjected to possible humiliation. I feel this idea of being humane will have a tremendous tug on the rope, more in favor of NO. No one wants to be subjected to life-altering experiments against their will. 

Going with what Mr. Zed said, I would kindly disagree. 

"They are put to death BECAUSE the the world would be a better place without them ... why study them or conduct experiments on them ? That will just give them more opportunity to ruin what they already haven't."

They are going to die in the end...would it matter in what way they may die? And I do not see how they may ruin already what they haven't. Not everyone on Death Row is going to be that menacing guy or gal. Many regret their decisions, and end up becoming humble and accepting the consequences to their actions. They do not have a chance to ruin anything they already haven't while in jail too.
I do not think that there will be a problem with experiments going wrong...those are only for movies. 

I must say, I am in the middle. There is no option for being in the middle for your essay (I presume), so I am glad I am not assigned that essay. Jk lol. I would have to think a little more about this, but the humane part is really tugging my chains and pulling me over to NO...

Good luck with your essay.
Trusted Member


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 08-10-13
Location: United States
Last Post: 3699 days
Last Active: 3621 days

11-12-13 02:53 AM
sloanstar1000 is Offline
| ID: 926248 | 115 Words

sloanstar1000
Level: 46


POSTS: 263/473
POST EXP: 35513
LVL EXP: 669402
CP: 953.8
VIZ: 204150

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
I personally don't have a problem with using them as test subjects for medical tests, as long as these medical tests wouldn't potential for causing them excessive pain or mental trauma. Then again, if they die from a medical test, isn't that the point in the first place?

These people supposedly have done something horrible enough where people have decided that they deserve to pay with their life. Rats on the other hand have done nothing. If you murder someone or multiple people, I think it's more than fair to give your body to science. The Nazis thought the same thing, so I'm not sure what that says about me, but that's my opinion.
I personally don't have a problem with using them as test subjects for medical tests, as long as these medical tests wouldn't potential for causing them excessive pain or mental trauma. Then again, if they die from a medical test, isn't that the point in the first place?

These people supposedly have done something horrible enough where people have decided that they deserve to pay with their life. Rats on the other hand have done nothing. If you murder someone or multiple people, I think it's more than fair to give your body to science. The Nazis thought the same thing, so I'm not sure what that says about me, but that's my opinion.
Member
Destroying pixelated antagonists since 1996


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 08-24-12
Location: SC
Last Post: 3144 days
Last Active: 2150 days

11-12-13 05:47 AM
UFC is Offline
| ID: 926265 | 39 Words

UFC
Level: 66


POSTS: 540/1083
POST EXP: 41424
LVL EXP: 2408598
CP: 4785.4
VIZ: 5090

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
I'd rather neither to be honest but if I had to choose than I would choose the inmates be the guinea pigs. It's cruel that scientists and cosmetic scientists do that to animals just for there own selfish needs.   
I'd rather neither to be honest but if I had to choose than I would choose the inmates be the guinea pigs. It's cruel that scientists and cosmetic scientists do that to animals just for there own selfish needs.   
Perma Banned
Heil Satan


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 09-27-11
Last Post: 3546 days
Last Active: 3545 days

11-12-13 07:06 AM
Light Knight is Offline
| ID: 926274 | 120 Words

Light Knight
Davideo3.14
Level: 121


POSTS: 2099/3819
POST EXP: 276083
LVL EXP: 19817439
CP: 11293.5
VIZ: 1051184

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
Interesting.

On one hand, they are sentenced to DEATH, not experiments and whatever terrible side effects they may experience.

On the other, if the judge, when sentencing, adds to the death sentenced the "guinea pig" condition, then maybe it would be an ok idea.


I'm just concerned that if we are allowed to conduct experiments on those in death row, we may start treating them inhumanly... and that is usually not acceptable. But then I think about someone who has, let's say, raped his daughter to death and horrifically tortured and killed several toddler... my feeling is that he deserves to have human experiments on him, regardless of the pain and suffering they may cause. But... is that really right?
Interesting.

On one hand, they are sentenced to DEATH, not experiments and whatever terrible side effects they may experience.

On the other, if the judge, when sentencing, adds to the death sentenced the "guinea pig" condition, then maybe it would be an ok idea.


I'm just concerned that if we are allowed to conduct experiments on those in death row, we may start treating them inhumanly... and that is usually not acceptable. But then I think about someone who has, let's say, raped his daughter to death and horrifically tortured and killed several toddler... my feeling is that he deserves to have human experiments on him, regardless of the pain and suffering they may cause. But... is that really right?
Vizzed Elite
Former Admin
Loyal Knight of Vizzed


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 12-08-04
Location: The Internet
Last Post: 65 days
Last Active: 29 days

11-12-13 08:09 AM
rcarter2 is Offline
| ID: 926287 | 391 Words

rcarter2
Level: 161


POSTS: 7184/8463
POST EXP: 758515
LVL EXP: 53462399
CP: 33586.4
VIZ: 1689508

Likes: 2  Dislikes: 0
No. That was not a part of their sentence. When they are executed, they have paid their debt to society (at least as in the eyes of people who support the death penalty). The thing is, we have a rights that we all are given, no matter what. It doesn't matter if an illegal search ends up proving you slaughtered 50 people. If the search is illegal, that evidence has to be completely dismissed from the case. We have rights to treat everyone equally (mostly). Nowhere in our Constitution or any law does it state that when one is put on death row, that all of their rights are null and void. A police officer is not allowed to savagely beat a death row inmate just because he/she is going to be put to death anyway. That is not how the law is. Now, medical testing is different than a savage beating. But in some cases, it could end up being worse. But that is neither here nor there. The point is, even death row inmates are considered citizens, and they are given rights as such. I think that medical testing would fall under the category of cruel and unusual punishment and even borderline torture, both of which are not allowed under the eyes of the law. They cannot be forced into medical testing just because 'they're going to die anyway'. By that logic, who cares if we tie them up and taze them every morning? What does it matter if people can pay to be in a firing squad with high powered paintball guns? What's wrong with allowing an occasional unprovoked blow to the head with a nightstick? I mean, if they die, isn't that the point of their sentence anyway? 

I find that when a lot of people talk about their opinion on death row inmates, they forget their own humanity a little bit. Yes, they did something horrible. Yes, they hurt more than just the ones they killed. But they are human beings too. I don't see how others seem capable of treating ANY person less than human. Especially those who claim to be Christians, which is supposed to promote compassion no matter what the circumstance. Don't let a death row inmate's actions cause you to lose a little bit of your own humanity, even for a second. 
No. That was not a part of their sentence. When they are executed, they have paid their debt to society (at least as in the eyes of people who support the death penalty). The thing is, we have a rights that we all are given, no matter what. It doesn't matter if an illegal search ends up proving you slaughtered 50 people. If the search is illegal, that evidence has to be completely dismissed from the case. We have rights to treat everyone equally (mostly). Nowhere in our Constitution or any law does it state that when one is put on death row, that all of their rights are null and void. A police officer is not allowed to savagely beat a death row inmate just because he/she is going to be put to death anyway. That is not how the law is. Now, medical testing is different than a savage beating. But in some cases, it could end up being worse. But that is neither here nor there. The point is, even death row inmates are considered citizens, and they are given rights as such. I think that medical testing would fall under the category of cruel and unusual punishment and even borderline torture, both of which are not allowed under the eyes of the law. They cannot be forced into medical testing just because 'they're going to die anyway'. By that logic, who cares if we tie them up and taze them every morning? What does it matter if people can pay to be in a firing squad with high powered paintball guns? What's wrong with allowing an occasional unprovoked blow to the head with a nightstick? I mean, if they die, isn't that the point of their sentence anyway? 

I find that when a lot of people talk about their opinion on death row inmates, they forget their own humanity a little bit. Yes, they did something horrible. Yes, they hurt more than just the ones they killed. But they are human beings too. I don't see how others seem capable of treating ANY person less than human. Especially those who claim to be Christians, which is supposed to promote compassion no matter what the circumstance. Don't let a death row inmate's actions cause you to lose a little bit of your own humanity, even for a second. 
Vizzed Elite
Dominating RGR Competition Hall of Fame Table!


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 05-01-11
Location: Kansas
Last Post: 2439 days
Last Active: 748 days

Post Rating: 2   Liked By: Brigand, sloanstar1000,

11-12-13 10:13 AM
fightorace is Offline
| ID: 926330 | 69 Words

fightorace
Level: 70

POSTS: 774/1194
POST EXP: 68908
LVL EXP: 2935675
CP: 1801.5
VIZ: 17916

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
If our legal system was perfect I wouldn't care too much, but it is run by humans who sadly make many mistakes.  Look up how many people were freed from death row when DNA evidence was first admissible in court.  We were going to kill innocent people.  How many more are sitting in there not guilty.  It is the same reason I don't believe in the death penalty period.
If our legal system was perfect I wouldn't care too much, but it is run by humans who sadly make many mistakes.  Look up how many people were freed from death row when DNA evidence was first admissible in court.  We were going to kill innocent people.  How many more are sitting in there not guilty.  It is the same reason I don't believe in the death penalty period.
Trusted Member
try me at tekken 6


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 05-19-10
Location: Indianapolis
Last Post: 2236 days
Last Active: 2138 days

11-12-13 07:33 PM
ruesen is Offline
| ID: 926658 | 111 Words

ruesen
Level: 44


POSTS: 394/444
POST EXP: 96475
LVL EXP: 605405
CP: 2610.9
VIZ: 134349

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
I think the death row inmates should have a choice, a volunteer program if you will, to become medical test subjects. The benefit for the inmate could be like giving them more comforts before their death date, or just postpone their death date until they are no longer able to help with medical testing. Could also let them die via a deadly testing (if they are willing to do so over lethal injection).

I do not agree with the idea of forcing death row inmates in medical studies though; even if they are vile humans, they are still humans.

Doesn't help that I'm not 100% for the death penalty either, though.
I think the death row inmates should have a choice, a volunteer program if you will, to become medical test subjects. The benefit for the inmate could be like giving them more comforts before their death date, or just postpone their death date until they are no longer able to help with medical testing. Could also let them die via a deadly testing (if they are willing to do so over lethal injection).

I do not agree with the idea of forcing death row inmates in medical studies though; even if they are vile humans, they are still humans.

Doesn't help that I'm not 100% for the death penalty either, though.
Trusted Member
HansoHGH


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 10-10-12
Location: USA
Last Post: 3517 days
Last Active: 486 days

11-12-13 08:59 PM
wizardragon is Offline
| ID: 926705 | 10 Words

wizardragon
Level: 9

POSTS: 2/13
POST EXP: 125
LVL EXP: 2896
CP: 298.8
VIZ: 21700

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
no even though there bad people but no that wrong
no even though there bad people but no that wrong
Member

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 10-13-13
Location: Montgomery, AL
Last Post: 3772 days
Last Active: 2633 days

11-16-13 04:50 PM
Weylin is Offline
| ID: 928152 | 142 Words

Weylin
Level: 13

POSTS: 24/26
POST EXP: 2730
LVL EXP: 8169
CP: 49.2
VIZ: 8305

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
I would go so far as to say they should be able to do testing on criminals who are in jail, not just those on death row.
They are a burden on everyone else in the initial act that got them thrown in jail, as well as the tax money required to contain them.

The inmates could be given a few choices:
Do hard or tedious manual labor to earn your meals and living cell.
If you're skilled and know a useful trade, put it to use.
Let yourself undergo medical testing to earn your stay.

The main point is that they should be doing something productive, and lifting weights and playing b-ball out in the court sure as hell isn't productive.
The last thing you want is inmates being big and buff unless they're actually putting that strength to good use.
I would go so far as to say they should be able to do testing on criminals who are in jail, not just those on death row.
They are a burden on everyone else in the initial act that got them thrown in jail, as well as the tax money required to contain them.

The inmates could be given a few choices:
Do hard or tedious manual labor to earn your meals and living cell.
If you're skilled and know a useful trade, put it to use.
Let yourself undergo medical testing to earn your stay.

The main point is that they should be doing something productive, and lifting weights and playing b-ball out in the court sure as hell isn't productive.
The last thing you want is inmates being big and buff unless they're actually putting that strength to good use.
Member

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 11-05-13
Last Post: 3764 days
Last Active: 3755 days

11-16-13 05:09 PM
fightorace is Offline
| ID: 928161 | 10 Words

fightorace
Level: 70

POSTS: 793/1194
POST EXP: 68908
LVL EXP: 2935675
CP: 1801.5
VIZ: 17916

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
ruesen :  Giving the criminals a choice is a good idea.  
ruesen :  Giving the criminals a choice is a good idea.  
Trusted Member
try me at tekken 6


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 05-19-10
Location: Indianapolis
Last Post: 2236 days
Last Active: 2138 days

11-18-13 05:32 PM
Changedatrequest is Offline
| ID: 928935 | 10 Words


Txgangsta
Level: 57


POSTS: 112/789
POST EXP: 104913
LVL EXP: 1409155
CP: 2185.3
VIZ: 149875

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
Their rights are forfeit. Lets use them as guinea pigs.
Their rights are forfeit. Lets use them as guinea pigs.
Banned

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 03-04-13
Last Post: 2595 days
Last Active: 2592 days

11-25-13 04:21 PM
Surgiac is Offline
| ID: 931406 | 42 Words

Surgiac
Level: 107


POSTS: 2139/3151
POST EXP: 120741
LVL EXP: 12822764
CP: 3281.3
VIZ: 41133

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
I say only by volunteer. Yes, they do need to pay for their crimes but they can pay while still being forgiven by us. Forcing them to become guinea pigs is just another form of torture. If they volunteer, that's their business.
I say only by volunteer. Yes, they do need to pay for their crimes but they can pay while still being forgiven by us. Forcing them to become guinea pigs is just another form of torture. If they volunteer, that's their business.
Trusted Member

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 11-07-09
Location: A galaxy far, far away
Last Post: 2204 days
Last Active: 641 days

11-27-13 11:56 AM
warmaker is Offline
| ID: 932131 | 93 Words

warmaker
Level: 91

POSTS: 1239/2198
POST EXP: 240742
LVL EXP: 7344224
CP: 4969.1
VIZ: 198528

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
Absolutely not if it's forced on them.  There's a difference for being punished by death for a crime and being tortured and otherwise experimented upon.  They may have been terrible people but we do not, as a society, take a right to see them tortured and murdered and messed up for their crime.

Many countries that torture are looked at negatively.  I think American culture already has the world frowning at us.  If we started testing on humans, even criminals, that makes us even worse than what we are already assumed to be.
Absolutely not if it's forced on them.  There's a difference for being punished by death for a crime and being tortured and otherwise experimented upon.  They may have been terrible people but we do not, as a society, take a right to see them tortured and murdered and messed up for their crime.

Many countries that torture are looked at negatively.  I think American culture already has the world frowning at us.  If we started testing on humans, even criminals, that makes us even worse than what we are already assumed to be.
Trusted Member

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 05-02-10
Location: Honolulu, HI
Last Post: 3175 days
Last Active: 2838 days

11-27-13 03:08 PM
MoblinGardens is Offline
| ID: 932213 | 154 Words

MoblinGardens
Level: 71


POSTS: 921/1325
POST EXP: 89276
LVL EXP: 3115485
CP: 3893.2
VIZ: 169267

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
I would have to say that I don't think they should either. Even though they may have done horrible things in there past and possibly not even feel bad about it (some do) they are still human. It would go against their rights and go against about how we stand for equality. What if it was someone that was framed or was sent to prison by accident and they were testing on and they had horrible life changing results only to be told he could be released because they found out he/she didn't actually do it. To me, every human is still a human no matter what horrible things they have done in life. I think they best way to do something remotely like this is to give them a choice about what they want to do. However, unless they are seriously messed up most chances they won't want to test anything like that.
I would have to say that I don't think they should either. Even though they may have done horrible things in there past and possibly not even feel bad about it (some do) they are still human. It would go against their rights and go against about how we stand for equality. What if it was someone that was framed or was sent to prison by accident and they were testing on and they had horrible life changing results only to be told he could be released because they found out he/she didn't actually do it. To me, every human is still a human no matter what horrible things they have done in life. I think they best way to do something remotely like this is to give them a choice about what they want to do. However, unless they are seriously messed up most chances they won't want to test anything like that.
Trusted Member
Moblin


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 10-25-12
Location: The Great White North
Last Post: 266 days
Last Active: 3 days

12-05-13 07:55 PM
magimangr is Offline
| ID: 937186 | 41 Words

magimangr
Level: 36

POSTS: 131/273
POST EXP: 18895
LVL EXP: 286264
CP: 6264.0
VIZ: 151620

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
I don't know. There is always that rare chance that someone has been falsely accused and that would be horrible to do to them. Really even though some of these people are horrible criminals I still wouldn't want to torture someone.
I don't know. There is always that rare chance that someone has been falsely accused and that would be horrible to do to them. Really even though some of these people are horrible criminals I still wouldn't want to torture someone.
Member

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 03-19-13
Last Post: 2769 days
Last Active: 1680 days

12-05-13 08:46 PM
IgorBird122 is Offline
| ID: 937234 | 146 Words

IgorBird122
The_IB122
Level: 140


POSTS: 2440/6414
POST EXP: 526201
LVL EXP: 32885028
CP: 40905.1
VIZ: 779500

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
I think to my point of view, I think death row inmates should be guinea pigs with medical testing than using animals, I think to my point of view, with the animal testing, they're a difference between those animals and Humans like the body responds differently to those tests, and another thing why I think testing on inmates rather than animals, so PETA can finally shut up about the whole animal testing issue.

The only thing is in the United States, we have the 8th Amendment in the Constitution, and that is prohibiting cruel and unusual punishment, so that could be a factor that we don't use death row inmates (but I could be wrong though), but in case I am wrong about it and medical testing on them isn't cruel and unusual punishment, then why not do it so we at lease use those bodies.
I think to my point of view, I think death row inmates should be guinea pigs with medical testing than using animals, I think to my point of view, with the animal testing, they're a difference between those animals and Humans like the body responds differently to those tests, and another thing why I think testing on inmates rather than animals, so PETA can finally shut up about the whole animal testing issue.

The only thing is in the United States, we have the 8th Amendment in the Constitution, and that is prohibiting cruel and unusual punishment, so that could be a factor that we don't use death row inmates (but I could be wrong though), but in case I am wrong about it and medical testing on them isn't cruel and unusual punishment, then why not do it so we at lease use those bodies.
Vizzed Elite
The Shadow King


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 01-07-13
Location: The Big Easy
Last Post: 1451 days
Last Active: 1436 days

12-17-13 10:56 PM
mrunicornman is Offline
| ID: 943238 | 39 Words

mrunicornman
Level: 18


POSTS: 8/57
POST EXP: 2048
LVL EXP: 26368
CP: 569.3
VIZ: 53235

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
I believe this is a bad idea. When death row inmates are killed they are killed humanly. When subjected to medical experiments they might die inhumanely which would make the government no better then the people on death row
I believe this is a bad idea. When death row inmates are killed they are killed humanly. When subjected to medical experiments they might die inhumanely which would make the government no better then the people on death row
Member

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 12-17-13
Location: Unicorn Land
Last Post: 3701 days
Last Active: 2156 days

Links

Page Comments


This page has no comments

Adblocker detected!

Vizzed.com is very expensive to keep alive! The Ads pay for the servers.

Vizzed has 3 TB worth of games and 1 TB worth of music.  This site is free to use but the ads barely pay for the monthly server fees.  If too many more people use ad block, the site cannot survive.

We prioritize the community over the site profits.  This is why we avoid using annoying (but high paying) ads like most other sites which include popups, obnoxious sounds and animations, malware, and other forms of intrusiveness.  We'll do our part to never resort to these types of ads, please do your part by helping support this site by adding Vizzed.com to your ad blocking whitelist.

×