Remove Ad, Sign Up
Register to Remove Ad
Register to Remove Ad
Remove Ad, Sign Up
Register to Remove Ad
Register to Remove Ad
Signup for Free!
-More Features-
-Far Less Ads-
About   Users   Help
Users & Guests Online
On Page: 1
Directory: 101
Entire Site: 5 & 827
Page Staff: pokemon x, pennylessz, Barathemos, tgags123, alexanyways, supercool22, RavusRat,
04-18-24 03:04 AM

Thread Information

Views
1,503
Replies
5
Rating
0
Status
OPEN
Thread
Creator
NovemberJoy
06-30-12 11:44 PM
Last
Post
Rayman85
08-22-19 06:57 PM
System
Rating
6.8
Additional Thread Details
Views: 523
Today: 0
Users: 13 unique
Last User View
08-31-19
cafeman55

Thread Actions

Order
 

This game isn't as bad as everyone says it is...

 
Game's Ratings
Overall
Graphics
Sound
Addictiveness
Depth
Story
Difficulty
Average User Score
6.8
4.6
3.2
4.6
4.3
4
7.2
NovemberJoy's Score
5
5
1
5
5
N/A
7

06-30-12 11:44 PM
NovemberJoy is Offline
| ID: 609443 | 834 Words

NovemberJoy
Level: 78


POSTS: 372/1587
POST EXP: 161606
LVL EXP: 4325646
CP: 11611.5
VIZ: 514180

Likes: 1  Dislikes: 0
Ah, Pac-Man. How many people DON'T know what Pac-Man is? Actually, how many people have never PLAYED Pac-Man? I'd like to find them, and get them to play it. But, enough talk about that, let's talk a bit about the game.

You will immediately notice that the maze has been apparently run through a paper shredder, and barely even resembles the original maze. I'd guess it's due to size restraints, considering the size of this maze in comparison to the original. The maze, along with the other graphics, aren't really terrible - The worst part is actually Pac-Man himself, due to looking more like a blob than a round ball, and also due to being unable to face up or down. Also, for some reason, instead of eating round pellets, like in the arcade version, he's eating dash-shaped objects, which appear to be wafers. This is baffling, because it probably would use less pixels, and therefore less RAM, to just use a pellet.

One of the biggest problems noted about the game is that the ghosts flicker too much, so you can't see them very well. While it might be just because I'm playing on an emulator, I didn't have too much of a problem with it. Yes, it makes the game slightly more difficult to play, but it's not a game-breaking flaw.

The sound is ear-piercing, and is about as painful as an ear-piercing. When you start the game, and when you lose a life and restart, this horrible beepy noise plays. It really acts as a motivation to not die, so that you don't have to hear that horrible sound again.

Of course, this game only has the one maze, just like the original Pac-Man. It's really not too bad by Atari standards, by my judgement. Of course, there are problems, like the fact that the ghosts can go any direction from the ghost box, making the game that much harder. For some reason, it takes about two seconds to reappear on the other side of the maze when you use one of the shortcuts. This delay costs you valuable seconds, seconds that could be used to eat dots and run from the ghosts. I consider this a large flaw.

Of course, being an Atari port, the ghost AI is quite simplified, so that it mostly just tries to pursue you and cut you off. The maze design just makes it that much easier to get trapped by two ghosts, which I always hated.

The scoring system is also very simplified, with a digit removed and some point values being completely changed. The pellets/dots/wafers only give you ONE point, and basically everything in the game gives you more points than the dots and Power Pellets, which is a motivation to eat ghosts and treat items.

Of course, like the arcade version and almost all Atari games, the game gets more difficult and the ghosts become faster. After a few levels, it just gets really hard. The difficulty is somewhat lessened, by the fact that every time you complete the level, you get a free life.

Instead of describing the story, since there isn't one, I'll instead describe just how this game ended up the way it did. You see, the Odyssey console line was still in existence, and it was up to the Odyssey II, not to be confused with the Odyssey 200. To my knowledge, the system seems to have about as much or more power than the Atari 2600, but very little is known about it.

There was a game called K.C. Muncher, which was strikingly similar to Pac-Man, which hadn't come out on the Atari 2600 yet. Atari tried filing a lawsuit against them for making a game that was basically Pac-Man with a different name, but the game had enough differences that Magnavox won the lawsuit. Atari was then faced with a crisis - they had forgotten to work on THEIR version of Pac-Man, and it was only five weeks in development at the holiday season where it was planned to be released!

Atari, unfortunately, proceeded to just release the game as-is, as in an alpha state, to the public. 12 million copies were made, despite the fact that there were only 10 million Atari consoles, because they thought that the game being on Atari 2600 would boost the console's sales. The game didn't do too well, of course, and they ended up with a large number of copies unsold. It's been speculated that this game was a large contender in the Great Video Game Crash of 1983, but, really, what more was expected?

The fact that this game was an alpha version seems to cement that this isn't as bad a game as everyone says it is. It's fun for an Atari 2600 game, and a lot of fun by those standards, so where's the big problem with this? I just don't see where the bad rap comes from.

Rating - C+(Pretty good, but not good enough)
Ah, Pac-Man. How many people DON'T know what Pac-Man is? Actually, how many people have never PLAYED Pac-Man? I'd like to find them, and get them to play it. But, enough talk about that, let's talk a bit about the game.

You will immediately notice that the maze has been apparently run through a paper shredder, and barely even resembles the original maze. I'd guess it's due to size restraints, considering the size of this maze in comparison to the original. The maze, along with the other graphics, aren't really terrible - The worst part is actually Pac-Man himself, due to looking more like a blob than a round ball, and also due to being unable to face up or down. Also, for some reason, instead of eating round pellets, like in the arcade version, he's eating dash-shaped objects, which appear to be wafers. This is baffling, because it probably would use less pixels, and therefore less RAM, to just use a pellet.

One of the biggest problems noted about the game is that the ghosts flicker too much, so you can't see them very well. While it might be just because I'm playing on an emulator, I didn't have too much of a problem with it. Yes, it makes the game slightly more difficult to play, but it's not a game-breaking flaw.

The sound is ear-piercing, and is about as painful as an ear-piercing. When you start the game, and when you lose a life and restart, this horrible beepy noise plays. It really acts as a motivation to not die, so that you don't have to hear that horrible sound again.

Of course, this game only has the one maze, just like the original Pac-Man. It's really not too bad by Atari standards, by my judgement. Of course, there are problems, like the fact that the ghosts can go any direction from the ghost box, making the game that much harder. For some reason, it takes about two seconds to reappear on the other side of the maze when you use one of the shortcuts. This delay costs you valuable seconds, seconds that could be used to eat dots and run from the ghosts. I consider this a large flaw.

Of course, being an Atari port, the ghost AI is quite simplified, so that it mostly just tries to pursue you and cut you off. The maze design just makes it that much easier to get trapped by two ghosts, which I always hated.

The scoring system is also very simplified, with a digit removed and some point values being completely changed. The pellets/dots/wafers only give you ONE point, and basically everything in the game gives you more points than the dots and Power Pellets, which is a motivation to eat ghosts and treat items.

Of course, like the arcade version and almost all Atari games, the game gets more difficult and the ghosts become faster. After a few levels, it just gets really hard. The difficulty is somewhat lessened, by the fact that every time you complete the level, you get a free life.

Instead of describing the story, since there isn't one, I'll instead describe just how this game ended up the way it did. You see, the Odyssey console line was still in existence, and it was up to the Odyssey II, not to be confused with the Odyssey 200. To my knowledge, the system seems to have about as much or more power than the Atari 2600, but very little is known about it.

There was a game called K.C. Muncher, which was strikingly similar to Pac-Man, which hadn't come out on the Atari 2600 yet. Atari tried filing a lawsuit against them for making a game that was basically Pac-Man with a different name, but the game had enough differences that Magnavox won the lawsuit. Atari was then faced with a crisis - they had forgotten to work on THEIR version of Pac-Man, and it was only five weeks in development at the holiday season where it was planned to be released!

Atari, unfortunately, proceeded to just release the game as-is, as in an alpha state, to the public. 12 million copies were made, despite the fact that there were only 10 million Atari consoles, because they thought that the game being on Atari 2600 would boost the console's sales. The game didn't do too well, of course, and they ended up with a large number of copies unsold. It's been speculated that this game was a large contender in the Great Video Game Crash of 1983, but, really, what more was expected?

The fact that this game was an alpha version seems to cement that this isn't as bad a game as everyone says it is. It's fun for an Atari 2600 game, and a lot of fun by those standards, so where's the big problem with this? I just don't see where the bad rap comes from.

Rating - C+(Pretty good, but not good enough)
Vizzed Elite

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 06-24-11
Last Post: 775 days
Last Active: 681 days

Post Rating: 1   Liked By: Rayman85,

07-01-12 12:27 AM
starwars293 is Offline
| ID: 609467 | 28 Words

starwars293
Level: 109


POSTS: 2572/3425
POST EXP: 104399
LVL EXP: 13673140
CP: 3101.7
VIZ: 139637

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
This game isn't really bad. It might not better then the NES version of it or the Arcade version of it, but it's pretty good. Nice review there
This game isn't really bad. It might not better then the NES version of it or the Arcade version of it, but it's pretty good. Nice review there
Trusted Member

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 07-22-11
Location: Canada
Last Post: 2800 days
Last Active: 1246 days

07-21-12 09:47 PM
KingofRPG is Offline
| ID: 621909 | 42 Words

KingofRPG
Level: 16


POSTS: 15/40
POST EXP: 6346
LVL EXP: 16691
CP: 1219.9
VIZ: 48222

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
I think why it would be as bad as everyone says it is because it was rushed and sloppy. Mainly because Atari was focused on getting it to the people in time for the holiday rather than the quality of the game.
I think why it would be as bad as everyone says it is because it was rushed and sloppy. Mainly because Atari was focused on getting it to the people in time for the holiday rather than the quality of the game.
Member
Gauuuuuu, werewolves of Cornelia~


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 05-17-12
Last Post: 2878 days
Last Active: 181 days

10-13-12 02:39 AM
G@mehe@d is Offline
| ID: 671886 | 46 Words

G@mehe@d
Level: 57


POSTS: 447/789
POST EXP: 93508
LVL EXP: 1461758
CP: 5795.2
VIZ: 20935

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
In my opinion this game is somewhat underated. It might look bad and there might be a lot of flicker but if you play it on a real Atari you might enjoy it better. I hate this game but I love it at the same time.
In my opinion this game is somewhat underated. It might look bad and there might be a lot of flicker but if you play it on a real Atari you might enjoy it better. I hate this game but I love it at the same time.
Trusted Member

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 05-20-12
Location: Texas
Last Post: 2457 days
Last Active: 364 days

10-16-12 07:00 AM
RetroGameNinja is Offline
| ID: 673374 | 20 Words

RetroGameNinja
Level: 46


POSTS: 94/468
POST EXP: 22103
LVL EXP: 679110
CP: 5910.7
VIZ: 176166

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
Yeah... Pac-Man for the Atari 2600 is actually a pretty good game! I wonder why so many people hate it?
Yeah... Pac-Man for the Atari 2600 is actually a pretty good game! I wonder why so many people hate it?
Member
i'll be alive next year


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 12-23-11
Last Post: 1093 days
Last Active: 600 days

08-22-19 06:57 PM
Rayman85 is Offline
| ID: 1374795 | 158 Words

Rayman85
Canadian Eagle
Level: 26


POSTS: 100/133
POST EXP: 12298
LVL EXP: 94134
CP: 6300.3
VIZ: 336978

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 1
NovemberJoy : Actual review title? Check. Proper grammar? Check. Mention of gameplay? Check. Of course, the gameplay doesn't mention how the game plays in its entirety like it should, but I at least commend you for explaining some differences between this version and the arcade original. Not many people mention Gameplay at all in their reviews, stupidly enough.

When writing a review, you should write it so that a person who has never heard of a game can grasp what it is about by reading your review - even if it is one as iconic as Pac-Man. But yeah, I've played this game here on Vizzed.com via the MAME emulator and it actually plays really fine. I guess people just can't get over the 1983 Video Game Crash and the flickering ghosts (which I admit is an issue). I mean, I'd play this over The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild any hour. That game is seriously bad!
NovemberJoy : Actual review title? Check. Proper grammar? Check. Mention of gameplay? Check. Of course, the gameplay doesn't mention how the game plays in its entirety like it should, but I at least commend you for explaining some differences between this version and the arcade original. Not many people mention Gameplay at all in their reviews, stupidly enough.

When writing a review, you should write it so that a person who has never heard of a game can grasp what it is about by reading your review - even if it is one as iconic as Pac-Man. But yeah, I've played this game here on Vizzed.com via the MAME emulator and it actually plays really fine. I guess people just can't get over the 1983 Video Game Crash and the flickering ghosts (which I admit is an issue). I mean, I'd play this over The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild any hour. That game is seriously bad!
Member

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 12-25-13
Location: Canada
Last Post: 1565 days
Last Active: 1554 days

Links

Adblocker detected!

Vizzed.com is very expensive to keep alive! The Ads pay for the servers.

Vizzed has 3 TB worth of games and 1 TB worth of music.  This site is free to use but the ads barely pay for the monthly server fees.  If too many more people use ad block, the site cannot survive.

We prioritize the community over the site profits.  This is why we avoid using annoying (but high paying) ads like most other sites which include popups, obnoxious sounds and animations, malware, and other forms of intrusiveness.  We'll do our part to never resort to these types of ads, please do your part by helping support this site by adding Vizzed.com to your ad blocking whitelist.

×