Alright, this time I am reviewing a game that nobody can argue that is a classic: the infamous Pac-man. Let's get down to business.

I'm going to start with overall this time, try something new. So here we go...

i am going to give this game a nine point eight (9.8) for overall, the reason being that is a classic, and the game is addicting as it could possible be. A great 2D based game, and a classic.

For Difficulty i am going to give it an eight (8).
    Those colored ghosts are annoying as crap, and always find a way to trap me when I get near 200,000 points. They are very annoying. It get frustrating at times, but it makes the game a lot more fun, which is a must. A game is nothing if it is not fun. Then you actually have the "map" changing up every now and then, which keeps the game interesting. The game is difficult because it is hard to get to the goal of points that you want to get to. And that adds to the difficulty.

The depth of the game gets a five (5). 
   There is not much to it past eating dots and staying away from ghosts. And the story is not much either. 

The Story gets a mere five (5).
   The only story I ever saw in this game is Pac-Man and Mrs. Pac-Man meet each other, get married, and have kids. That is all I have even seen for a story line in this game.

The Addictiveness of this game gets a huge nine (9).
   The game is simple, yet so very addictive. The goal is to get the most points as you possibly can, and each time you play it, you want more points. The game is so simple, it is addictive.

I am going to give this game a five (5)  for sound. 
   The sound is repetitive: doop doop doop doop. That is it. The reason it gets a five is because I actually like it.

And last but not least, this game gets a five (5) in graphics.
   The graphics are pretty bad, even for a 2D based simple game. The reason it gets a five is because the game is so addicting.

If anybody has any questions about anything dealing with my review, please; post here. I crave your criticism on how I can improve my reviews.

Ah Pac-Man. The name that's in my name. This game is pretty good. Since it came from the arcades, people pretty much demanded it to be a home console game, then this came around. It didn't disappoint, really. I loved it for the NES, I also liked Ms. Pac-Man for Genesis. I liked the arcade style games than the "new version" of Pacman now.

pacman1755 : Agreed on the topic that the original is better.But the arcade one is even better than original for gaming consoles though.

I noticed that this isn't near as thorough as your Mario Kart 64 review. I know you are trying to get a staff position, so I'll remind you one thing. If I remember correctly, staff reviews have to be a minimum of 500 words, and this one is 404 words long, so lengthen it up a tad. My other thing is the same critique as I had with your Mario Kart 64 review in making the overall score reflect the scores you gave in the other categories. But you made this before I even brought that up in your last review, so this is just a re-enforcer. 9.8 doesn't really reflect scores of 8, 5, 5, 9, 5, 5. 

rcarter2 : I have reasons for making the overall the way I do. Such as personal enjoyment, and then sometimes you can not judge an overall score by the components that is has. That is just my way of doing things. Sorry. And as for the 500 word thing... that is nice to know. Thanks for that. And the reason it was not as elaborate as the other one is that Mario kart has a lot more going on than Pac Man. So yeah. Sorry about that. 

You really don't need to be so polite to me about it. You clearly have your own reasons for doing things the way you do, so stick with them. Like I said, I was making those suggestions because I wasn't aware that you had your own reasons for scoring the way you do. There is no universal way to do it. So again, you do not need to keep apologizing to me. If i have questions or critiques that you have answers to, tell them to me to shut me up I think that you are likely in a good position for the next time David hires people.

This is the best review out of your 3 submitted for the Rgr Staff Reviewer position - I'm going to consider your submissions.