Which game did not need a sequel? Its a really easy question and I'm surprised no one on vizzed has tackled this before. Maybe the game was good but really did not need a sequel or its because the first game was and bad did not deserve a sequel. Tell me guys I would love to know. 


Thanks for all the replies guys. I'm really happy 

Bubsy! That game was not very good at all and every time they made a new one it seemed to be a little worse. There was Bubsys from Super Nintendo and Genesis to Nintendo 64 and Playstation. The N64 and Playstation one is probably the worst of all but none of them are really all that playable. You would think after making so many mistakes and playing around with it, they would learn how to make the game better not worse but oh well.

GenesisJunkie : A post i 100% agree with!

Which game did not need a sequel? I think Bubsy from nintendo 64

Ermira : you said the same thing as GenesisJunkie but i agree with you

Which game did not need a sequel? I think Slim City game

asdren : Are you the same person.
Local Moderators : what is this!?

imamonster : What are you saying I do not understand ?

asdren : are you the same person as Ermira

What? What? Ermira,Er kapo are my friends. Are you crazy?

asdren : calm down

imamonster : Before to replicate with someone meditate 

I see why you could think that. If you have a question like that, you could always PM a Mod. It would result in less trouble for you.

As for the others, there's no need to be rude about it. A simple "no" suffices for a yes or No question. "Are you crazy" is a bit unnecessary.

Eirinn : Thank you.

I give right Asdreni. Imammonster has no right to accuse others vain

Alright, let's get this thread back on topic. The current discussion can be handled in PM.

Alright, first up: I'm sorry to all fans, but Final Fantasy. It had a lot of potential, but that potential went unused. It was lacking in content, and left you confused.

I'm sure I'll think of more to post, but for now, that's all I can think of. I can think of several sequel fails though. lol

Eirinn : Yeah final fantasy is not so good. I hope i dont have millions of Final Fantasy fans stalking me now

So Darksiders is an ok title but the sequel left me disappointed.
Everybody agrees on Duke Nukem Forever right?
Call of Duty became too repetitive nowadays.
Every game that has something to do with "City Interactive" should be illegal.
Do not even start with sports games EA offers!
Nee for Speed series has a lot of good games but it is CoD level.
Fade to black was not good enough to be a sequel.
Battlefield 4, the unfinished rushed Battlefield 3 DLC.
Some people don't like Legend of Zelda 2.
C&C games that are not made by Westwood Studios is a max 2/10 on my list.
Now joke time: Gaben agrees on the sequel of Half-Life 2: EP2 should not be made.

Quhark : Well zelda deserved a sequel it was just that the sequel was not so good

I'm gonna have to say BioShock. That game was a pearl of brilliance. It was creepy, it had suspense, its story was top notch with no dangling plot threads and such... It didn't need a sequel at all. But then came BioShock 2. This time, you actually got to play as a Big Daddy. Looks good on paper, but why?

Before BioShock 2 came out, I was like, "Okay, so Big Daddies are awesome, but why would I want to play as a big, heavy, clumsy monster who could barely support his own weight?" But then I played it when it came out, and apparently, you were indeed a Big Daddy, but you could move just like a normal human being would. WELL, THAT MEANS I'M NOT A BIG DADDY, DOES IT? Seriously, now I'm just the guy from the last game with a frikkin' fishbowl on his head...

Besides, the ending of the last game wasn't like an open ending, so that a sequel definitely needed to be made. The multiple endings all tied up all the plot threads neatly making for a very satisfying ending. BioShock didn't. Need. A. Sequel.

But BioShock Infinite was still great.