Remove Ad, Sign Up
Register to Remove Ad
Register to Remove Ad
Remove Ad, Sign Up
Register to Remove Ad
Register to Remove Ad
Signup for Free!
-More Features-
-Far Less Ads-
About   Users   Help
Users & Guests Online
On Page: 1
Directory: 78
Entire Site: 3 & 802
Page Staff: pokemon x, pennylessz, Barathemos, tgags123, alexanyways, supercool22, RavusRat,
04-23-24 05:27 AM

Forum Links

Related Threads
Coming Soon

Thread Information

Views
291
Replies
0
Rating
0
Status
CLOSED
Thread
Creator
DragonSlayer22
04-16-17 04:00 PM
Last
Post
DragonSlayer22
04-16-17 04:00 PM
Additional Thread Details
Views: 250
Today: 0
Users: 3 unique
Last User View
07-09-17
gamerforlifef.

Thread Actions

Thread Closed
New Thread
New Poll
Order
 

Star Wars Battlefront II (EA) trailer released

 

04-16-17 04:00 PM
DragonSlayer22 is Offline
| ID: 1335335 | 216 Words

DragonSlayer22
Level: 28


POSTS: 127/181
POST EXP: 26520
LVL EXP: 128541
CP: 2124.0
VIZ: 57781

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
Alright, anyone who knows me knows that I dislike Electronic Farts Arts for various reasons, the most recent one is what they did to Star Wars Battlefront in 2015, for making the game $60 + a $50 season pass that you have to wait for the content to be made because maybe a lack of preparation, I don't know (most likely because of Rouge One now that I think about it). That is $110 for a game that has:

* No Campaign mode

* No prequel (clone trooper) battles like in 2 from 2005

* The multiplayer is really the only choice for this game

* Can't be played offline and if the EA servers are down is useless
 
Congrats on the achievement EA, you really won here

So now that the new trailer actually looks good for once for the new game that is coming out that may have all of these features, will you guys be willing to shell out the cash in your wallets for EA, after the Battlefront (2015) players are basically treated as beta testers? I would rather have a more of a Battlefield style to the game than what they were going for 2 years ago (seriously there wasn't even weapon customization) and their strange card system that they implemented.  
Alright, anyone who knows me knows that I dislike Electronic Farts Arts for various reasons, the most recent one is what they did to Star Wars Battlefront in 2015, for making the game $60 + a $50 season pass that you have to wait for the content to be made because maybe a lack of preparation, I don't know (most likely because of Rouge One now that I think about it). That is $110 for a game that has:

* No Campaign mode

* No prequel (clone trooper) battles like in 2 from 2005

* The multiplayer is really the only choice for this game

* Can't be played offline and if the EA servers are down is useless
 
Congrats on the achievement EA, you really won here

So now that the new trailer actually looks good for once for the new game that is coming out that may have all of these features, will you guys be willing to shell out the cash in your wallets for EA, after the Battlefront (2015) players are basically treated as beta testers? I would rather have a more of a Battlefield style to the game than what they were going for 2 years ago (seriously there wasn't even weapon customization) and their strange card system that they implemented.  
Member

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 09-05-16
Last Post: 2329 days
Last Active: 1093 days

Links

Page Comments


This page has no comments

Adblocker detected!

Vizzed.com is very expensive to keep alive! The Ads pay for the servers.

Vizzed has 3 TB worth of games and 1 TB worth of music.  This site is free to use but the ads barely pay for the monthly server fees.  If too many more people use ad block, the site cannot survive.

We prioritize the community over the site profits.  This is why we avoid using annoying (but high paying) ads like most other sites which include popups, obnoxious sounds and animations, malware, and other forms of intrusiveness.  We'll do our part to never resort to these types of ads, please do your part by helping support this site by adding Vizzed.com to your ad blocking whitelist.

×