Remove Ad, Sign Up
Register to Remove Ad
Register to Remove Ad
Remove Ad, Sign Up
Register to Remove Ad
Register to Remove Ad
Signup for Free!
-More Features-
-Far Less Ads-
About   Users   Help
Users & Guests Online
On Page: 1
Directory: 1 & 151
Entire Site: 6 & 1201
Page Staff: pokemon x, pennylessz, Barathemos, tgags123, alexanyways, supercool22, RavusRat,
04-19-24 09:25 PM

Thread Information

Views
2,409
Replies
15
Rating
0
Status
CLOSED
Thread
Creator
tr33l3x
01-07-10 10:02 AM
Last
Post
divided_skye
04-13-10 01:06 AM
Additional Thread Details
Views: 427
Today: 1
Users: 0 unique

Thread Actions

Thread Closed
New Thread
New Poll
Order
 

Command&Conquer vs. WarCraft vs. StarCraft

 

01-07-10 10:02 AM
tr33l3x is Offline
| ID: 131472 | 75 Words

tr33l3x
Level: 42


POSTS: 54/365
POST EXP: 14467
LVL EXP: 504693
CP: 60.6
VIZ: 10150

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
Command and Conquer: Red Alert is my favorite...

StarCraft release date: 31 March 1998
Command and Conquer release date: 31 August 1995
WarCraft: Orcs and Humans release date: 30 May 1994

I mean WarCraft was a cool game when it came out because it was like an enterprising idea, but i have to say StarCraft took over big time in Asia.

Just wanted to see some feedback on what you guys used to play more
Command and Conquer: Red Alert is my favorite...

StarCraft release date: 31 March 1998
Command and Conquer release date: 31 August 1995
WarCraft: Orcs and Humans release date: 30 May 1994

I mean WarCraft was a cool game when it came out because it was like an enterprising idea, but i have to say StarCraft took over big time in Asia.

Just wanted to see some feedback on what you guys used to play more
Member

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 12-16-09
Location: Beyond the Grave
Last Post: 2953 days
Last Active: 2900 days

01-07-10 11:44 AM
DarkHyren is Offline
| ID: 131490 | 72 Words

DarkHyren
Level: 160


POSTS: 4008/7842
POST EXP: 744411
LVL EXP: 51969162
CP: 993.7
VIZ: 483674

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
I would have to say StarCraft is my favorite from the these.
I havn't played C&C or WC: O&H though so I can't judge them.
I have played WC3 and I like that probally nearly as much as SC, just differently.
I never play Battle.net with these games though, too many cheaters and I prefer to have a long game, not one that's over in 5 mins.

"You must construct additional pylons"
I would have to say StarCraft is my favorite from the these.
I havn't played C&C or WC: O&H though so I can't judge them.
I have played WC3 and I like that probally nearly as much as SC, just differently.
I never play Battle.net with these games though, too many cheaters and I prefer to have a long game, not one that's over in 5 mins.

"You must construct additional pylons"
Vizzed Elite
Elite Lurker King

2nd Place in the June 2009 VCS!
2nd Place in the December 2009 VCS!


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 12-19-08
Last Post: 2609 days
Last Active: 1413 days

01-07-10 11:47 AM
geeogree is Offline
| ID: 131491 | 88 Words

geeogree
Mr Geeohn-A-Vash53215
Level: 291


POSTS: 5154/29291
POST EXP: 1955397
LVL EXP: 420798976
CP: 52502.1
VIZ: 531391

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
I agree with DH for the most part on this one.

I just never enjoyed C&C. I don't know why though.

I love Warcraft and Starcraft. Starcraft is better than War1, but not better than 3, and maybe equivalent to 2 .

And battle.net is crap. All people learned how to do was build as fast as humanly possible on that one map that everyone plays and most games were over in 15 minutes or less. It didn't feel like there was real strategy involved in those games.
I agree with DH for the most part on this one.

I just never enjoyed C&C. I don't know why though.

I love Warcraft and Starcraft. Starcraft is better than War1, but not better than 3, and maybe equivalent to 2 .

And battle.net is crap. All people learned how to do was build as fast as humanly possible on that one map that everyone plays and most games were over in 15 minutes or less. It didn't feel like there was real strategy involved in those games.
Vizzed Elite
Former Admin
Banzilla


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 01-03-05
Last Post: 113 days
Last Active: 14 hours

01-07-10 01:58 PM
tr33l3x is Offline
| ID: 131508 | 47 Words

tr33l3x
Level: 42


POSTS: 62/365
POST EXP: 14467
LVL EXP: 504693
CP: 60.6
VIZ: 10150

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
i totally agree with the Battle.net.... i think if they did with that what they did with Steam for Half-Life they would be in better shape and more people would actually enjoy playing it.... rather than the constant frustration of not being able to win ever
i totally agree with the Battle.net.... i think if they did with that what they did with Steam for Half-Life they would be in better shape and more people would actually enjoy playing it.... rather than the constant frustration of not being able to win ever
Member

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 12-16-09
Location: Beyond the Grave
Last Post: 2953 days
Last Active: 2900 days

01-10-10 12:42 AM
Aaronrulz1 is Offline
| ID: 131800 | 15 Words

Aaronrulz1
Level: 37


POSTS: 117/250
POST EXP: 9183
LVL EXP: 328440
CP: 51.8
VIZ: 30820

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
Loved em all. Loved playing user map setting starcraft games.. always thought that was cool.
Loved em all. Loved playing user map setting starcraft games.. always thought that was cool.
Vizzed Elite
Affected by AWESOMENESS syndrome


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 05-25-05
Location: Santa Clarita, Ca
Last Post: 1970 days
Last Active: 254 days

01-10-10 01:12 PM
havoc_91 is Offline
| ID: 131836 | 55 Words

havoc_91
Level: 10

POSTS: 6/14
POST EXP: 527
LVL EXP: 3782
CP: 0.0
VIZ: 1168

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
well up till C&C4, command and conquer was my pick for best RTS game of all time but C&C4 just is another example of EA stupidity.



starcraft i never played but i'll be getting starcraft 2 just cause there really isn't another RTS that catches my eye.



never played WarCraft so can't comment on it
well up till C&C4, command and conquer was my pick for best RTS game of all time but C&C4 just is another example of EA stupidity.



starcraft i never played but i'll be getting starcraft 2 just cause there really isn't another RTS that catches my eye.



never played WarCraft so can't comment on it
Member

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 01-09-10
Last Post: 5001 days
Last Active: 5001 days

01-11-10 01:28 PM
tr33l3x is Offline
| ID: 131922 | 15 Words

tr33l3x
Level: 42


POSTS: 91/365
POST EXP: 14467
LVL EXP: 504693
CP: 60.6
VIZ: 10150

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
Originally posted by havoc_91
C&C4 just is another example of EA stupidity.



Totally agree with that....
Originally posted by havoc_91
C&C4 just is another example of EA stupidity.



Totally agree with that....
Member

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 12-16-09
Location: Beyond the Grave
Last Post: 2953 days
Last Active: 2900 days

01-12-10 01:04 AM
Solehite is Offline
| ID: 132001 | 80 Words

Solehite
Level: 68


POSTS: 820/1071
POST EXP: 104001
LVL EXP: 2609905
CP: 57.5
VIZ: 96664

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
Originally posted by havoc_91
starcraft i never played but i'll be getting starcraft 2 just cause there really isn't another RTS that catches my eye.



Why not try the first one then, so you can get used to the races and storylines. StarCraft 2 is meant to be a continuation with some different variations from the first game.

Out of the three I prefer StarCraft. I have played C&C and Warcraft 3, but i didn't like them as much as StarCraft.
Originally posted by havoc_91
starcraft i never played but i'll be getting starcraft 2 just cause there really isn't another RTS that catches my eye.



Why not try the first one then, so you can get used to the races and storylines. StarCraft 2 is meant to be a continuation with some different variations from the first game.

Out of the three I prefer StarCraft. I have played C&C and Warcraft 3, but i didn't like them as much as StarCraft.
Vizzed Elite

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 02-13-09
Location: Australia
Last Post: 4612 days
Last Active: 4612 days

01-13-10 05:57 PM
tr33l3x is Offline
| ID: 132269 | 15 Words

tr33l3x
Level: 42


POSTS: 119/365
POST EXP: 14467
LVL EXP: 504693
CP: 60.6
VIZ: 10150

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
One thing ab WarCraft tho, i liked the maps alot more than the latter two.....
One thing ab WarCraft tho, i liked the maps alot more than the latter two.....
Member

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 12-16-09
Location: Beyond the Grave
Last Post: 2953 days
Last Active: 2900 days

04-03-10 01:53 AM
arduin is Offline
| ID: 163167 | 170 Words

arduin
Level: 11

POSTS: 15/18
POST EXP: 2767
LVL EXP: 5474
CP: 0.0
VIZ: 2665

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
Having played all three, I gotta say I think Starcraft wins out.
Warcraft 1 was nice and everything, despite the annoying swipe of GW's foolishly discarded IP. It's worked well for them, but the game itself was nothing special. It had good moments, but was overall kinda "meh" for me.

C & C had some nice parts as well, but the storyline wasn't memorable. For instance, I can't remember it. XD
Seriously though, good game and all, but I had more fun with the later versions.

Perhaps Starcraft lucks out, being the latest, and so benefiting from the advanced technologies, but then again, it was the only game I ever played where I could read the instruction manual for fun. I mean, seriously, those creature entries were inspired. It had a good storyline, well integrated in the campaigns, and playing as each race was fun and exciting, since each played entirely differently, unlike in WC, where the Orcs/Humans were just different sprites for essentially identical units.

My two cents, heh.
Having played all three, I gotta say I think Starcraft wins out.
Warcraft 1 was nice and everything, despite the annoying swipe of GW's foolishly discarded IP. It's worked well for them, but the game itself was nothing special. It had good moments, but was overall kinda "meh" for me.

C & C had some nice parts as well, but the storyline wasn't memorable. For instance, I can't remember it. XD
Seriously though, good game and all, but I had more fun with the later versions.

Perhaps Starcraft lucks out, being the latest, and so benefiting from the advanced technologies, but then again, it was the only game I ever played where I could read the instruction manual for fun. I mean, seriously, those creature entries were inspired. It had a good storyline, well integrated in the campaigns, and playing as each race was fun and exciting, since each played entirely differently, unlike in WC, where the Orcs/Humans were just different sprites for essentially identical units.

My two cents, heh.
Member

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 03-25-10
Last Post: 5127 days
Last Active: 5077 days

04-03-10 07:35 AM
therabidsmurf is Offline
| ID: 163189 | 439 Words

therabidsmurf
Level: 16

POSTS: 15/40
POST EXP: 2110
LVL EXP: 18122
CP: 12.3
VIZ: 14253

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
I've played alot of all three:

Command and Conquer has alot alot of titles in its repertoire. The Red Alert series is a personal favorite out of the bunch with its over the top look at alternate history. The thing that always did it for me was the live action briefings. The campy style and the who's who of sci fi and B actors (including Tricia Helfer, Michael Ironside, Billy Dee Williams, Grace Park, Tim Curry, George Takei, Jonathan Pryce, James Earl Jones and on and on) were a great source of enjoyment and always gave a sense of acomplishment. As far as gameplay goes C&C is probably my least favorite of the three. The gatherer, base building, trickle of enemies AI never really changed till the later titles and even then didn't seem to change much. Over the length of the series the addition of the unit experiance system was nice. If you wanna try the series search out Command and Conquer X which is 12 different C&C games including Renegade the 1st person shooter based on the C&C universe and only around $15

Warcraft=glorious. Warcraft 2 kept me busy for a very very long time. After beating the game multiple times I would still spend hours with the map creator and replacing default windows sounds with the effects from the game. Warcraft 2 still makes its way into my play rotation from time to time. Warcraft 3 added ALOT to the formula with the hero system, neutral monsters and nice in game cut scene/briefings. Best of all is the robust map tools returned and the great community have created some of the most diverse multiplayer experiances out there with tower defense, zone control and zombie survival custom maps.

StarCraft...oh how I wait for your sequel. Starcraft had a great story and very unique play styles for all 3 races. Also robust map tools allowing for great multiplayer modes like golem madness. Wonderful story as well.

In summary C&C = 7.5/10 Warcraft = 9.5/10 StarCraft = 9/10 in my opinion.

Upon re-reading the OP realized this discussion is limited to first titles in the series...oops

In that regards Starcraft wins by a land slide. Warcraft Orcs and Humans felt like more of a test bed for the things Blizzard did later. On it's own it's interesting to check out but never could hold my attention too long. C&C was a bit more refined and was a solid rts experiance at the time but I have alot of trouble trying to play it now. Starcraft really benefitted from what came before and was ground breaking in the RTS field.
I've played alot of all three:

Command and Conquer has alot alot of titles in its repertoire. The Red Alert series is a personal favorite out of the bunch with its over the top look at alternate history. The thing that always did it for me was the live action briefings. The campy style and the who's who of sci fi and B actors (including Tricia Helfer, Michael Ironside, Billy Dee Williams, Grace Park, Tim Curry, George Takei, Jonathan Pryce, James Earl Jones and on and on) were a great source of enjoyment and always gave a sense of acomplishment. As far as gameplay goes C&C is probably my least favorite of the three. The gatherer, base building, trickle of enemies AI never really changed till the later titles and even then didn't seem to change much. Over the length of the series the addition of the unit experiance system was nice. If you wanna try the series search out Command and Conquer X which is 12 different C&C games including Renegade the 1st person shooter based on the C&C universe and only around $15

Warcraft=glorious. Warcraft 2 kept me busy for a very very long time. After beating the game multiple times I would still spend hours with the map creator and replacing default windows sounds with the effects from the game. Warcraft 2 still makes its way into my play rotation from time to time. Warcraft 3 added ALOT to the formula with the hero system, neutral monsters and nice in game cut scene/briefings. Best of all is the robust map tools returned and the great community have created some of the most diverse multiplayer experiances out there with tower defense, zone control and zombie survival custom maps.

StarCraft...oh how I wait for your sequel. Starcraft had a great story and very unique play styles for all 3 races. Also robust map tools allowing for great multiplayer modes like golem madness. Wonderful story as well.

In summary C&C = 7.5/10 Warcraft = 9.5/10 StarCraft = 9/10 in my opinion.

Upon re-reading the OP realized this discussion is limited to first titles in the series...oops

In that regards Starcraft wins by a land slide. Warcraft Orcs and Humans felt like more of a test bed for the things Blizzard did later. On it's own it's interesting to check out but never could hold my attention too long. C&C was a bit more refined and was a solid rts experiance at the time but I have alot of trouble trying to play it now. Starcraft really benefitted from what came before and was ground breaking in the RTS field.
Member

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 04-02-10
Last Post: 3383 days
Last Active: 3383 days

(edited by therabidsmurf on 04-03-10 07:42 AM)    

04-06-10 10:34 PM
xfighter1138 is Offline
| ID: 164881 | 20 Words

xfighter1138
Level: 76


POSTS: 1094/1392
POST EXP: 70877
LVL EXP: 3838934
CP: 119.4
VIZ: 56178

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
I'll go with StarCraft considering how the only C+C title I played was Renegade and I've never played Warcraft 3.
I'll go with StarCraft considering how the only C+C title I played was Renegade and I've never played Warcraft 3.
Trusted Member
A Wild Grue Appears


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 05-04-09
Location: Angola
Last Post: 1916 days
Last Active: 1886 days

04-09-10 04:43 AM
noelia is Offline
| ID: 165733 | 46 Words

noelia
Level: 165


POSTS: 339/8748
POST EXP: 304654
LVL EXP: 58713659
CP: 2040.0
VIZ: 444782

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
I love Command and Conquer: Red Alert.
I get it from my brother for a few days and I was playing it for hours.
It was a really good game¬_¬
The others are good too, but I don't like them as much as Command and Conquer.
I love Command and Conquer: Red Alert.
I get it from my brother for a few days and I was playing it for hours.
It was a really good game¬_¬
The others are good too, but I don't like them as much as Command and Conquer.
Vizzed Elite


1st Place in the July 2010 VCS Competition!

Affected by Tomb Raider syndrome


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 03-15-10
Location: Croft Manor
Last Post: 4449 days
Last Active: 4449 days

04-12-10 09:17 PM
mdynasty926 is Offline
| ID: 167408 | 36 Words

mdynasty926
Level: 69


POSTS: 69/1119
POST EXP: 111867
LVL EXP: 2746894
CP: 359.7
VIZ: 3339

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
C&C Red Alert was my first C&C game. I liked it a lot, and now i play the others except none of the newer ones like C&C3 or RA3... i've never played the other stuff though...
C&C Red Alert was my first C&C game. I liked it a lot, and now i play the others except none of the newer ones like C&C3 or RA3... i've never played the other stuff though...
Trusted Member

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 07-22-09
Last Post: 3392 days
Last Active: 2419 days

04-12-10 09:20 PM
retro _general is Offline
| ID: 167412 | 27 Words

retro _general
Level: 66


POSTS: 1010/1036
POST EXP: 25837
LVL EXP: 2405954
CP: 30.0
VIZ: 16871

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
SC was my little addiction because my cousins would always play it and got me hooked on it WC and C&C was ok just not like SC.
SC was my little addiction because my cousins would always play it and got me hooked on it WC and C&C was ok just not like SC.
Member
President of DoctorWho Club


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 01-17-10
Last Post: 5096 days
Last Active: 5096 days

04-13-10 01:06 AM
divided_skye is Offline
| ID: 167569 | 55 Words

divided_skye
Level: 6

POSTS: 4/5
POST EXP: 237
LVL EXP: 803
CP: 1.0
VIZ: 2603

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
Starcraft totally owned way more than either in my opinion. WarCraft was fun too but starcraft was always so much better for some unknown reason, i remember my favorite map/scenario was protect the guy, and no one ever wanted to be the guy lol. and I always thought command and conquer sucked all around lol.
Starcraft totally owned way more than either in my opinion. WarCraft was fun too but starcraft was always so much better for some unknown reason, i remember my favorite map/scenario was protect the guy, and no one ever wanted to be the guy lol. and I always thought command and conquer sucked all around lol.
Newbie

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 03-05-10
Last Post: 4482 days
Last Active: 2752 days

Links

Page Comments


This page has no comments

Adblocker detected!

Vizzed.com is very expensive to keep alive! The Ads pay for the servers.

Vizzed has 3 TB worth of games and 1 TB worth of music.  This site is free to use but the ads barely pay for the monthly server fees.  If too many more people use ad block, the site cannot survive.

We prioritize the community over the site profits.  This is why we avoid using annoying (but high paying) ads like most other sites which include popups, obnoxious sounds and animations, malware, and other forms of intrusiveness.  We'll do our part to never resort to these types of ads, please do your part by helping support this site by adding Vizzed.com to your ad blocking whitelist.

×