? ?Ms. Pacman is a classic game. You run around in this 2D scroller trying to eat as much as you can to get points. You have to cover the whole board and eat everything. There are sometimes new food such as apples or cherries. There is a endless supply of waves so you always try to beat your old score. There are also different food that allow you to kill the ghost that are hunting you down (4 per maze).
???
? ?The plot is after you beat a couple of boards you get this cut scene. It shows how?Ms. Pacman and Pacman fall in love.It is first them meeting the falling in love then having kids etc. Then once you beat all the cutscences It restarts from the first cut scene. The Graphics are not bad due to the fact that it is one of the first arcade game sequels.?
? ?
      The sound of the game was not bad. I can see why many people could be annoyed by it , but i like it. "Wakakakaka" is just what you expect for a game such as this. I had volume control problems though so it made the game go from silent to blasting in my ear.The sound is very original and unique.
      
      The game gets addicting very fast. You always keep trying on getting to a new level or seeing a new cutscence or beating your previous score. It's a classic arcade game.

      The difficulty of the game starts off easy. You run around getting points while dodging the ghost, but once you get far into the game it gets real difficult fast. The ghost get smarter and faster so you really want to get the ghost killing food a lot. There are also a lot of tricks on what each ghost does. Certain ghost follow other Ghost(which can make them like a team).

      The depth of the game is bad. It is the same old thing consistently ,but the addictiveness makes you ignore it.

Well, you've got a good start for a decent review here. Although, you should be going over more categories as well. How was the music, depth, and difficulty for instance. Or maybe even how it compares to other games with the same name. Simple reviews are fine, although they should be a bit more detailed than this.

patar4097 : thanks