How good is the user above you? Do you think he/she should have a higher position, more trust points or should it be the opposite?

I'll take two examples:
zanderlex is a trusted member. He deserves it in my opinion, he's really active, posts a lot, is nice to everyone and even made up the Pok?mon Osmium thread!

Black Bot is a normal member. But he's level 78, has a lot of posts, has a post rating of 64 but no trust points! I think he deserves at least more trust points in his position and maybe he should be a trusted member.

I hope you understand now, here are some of the other rules:
* Be honest and give good reasons why you rate someone higher or lower. Don't say 'he's a jerk' but say something like 'The user should be more nice', and also don't say 'He's nice to me' but 'He respects everyone'.
* Anyone can participate!
* If you don't do this, then... people won't like you! ?

Now, please rate me!

I don't know about this idea, I can kind of see this sparking into some sort of flame war or dispute, I know you probably don't intend for that to happen, but not everyone follows the rules and they might take it the wrong way, and I would really hate for this to blow up in your face. I don't really think it is a good idea to slap a rating down on someone and tell them if they are worthy of better or not....I am not going to request this to be closed, rather I will summon the mods for their opinion


Local Mods : What do you think about this? 

Razor basically summed up a reason but there is also a rule about rate threads which I think this classifies in that category. *closed*