Ethos (noun)
the guiding beliefs of a person, group, or organization. : the distinguishing character, sentiment, moral nature, or guiding beliefs of a person, group, or institution. [1] Now that you know what ethos means, let's get to the question. How might the set ethos in a community change during times of difficulty and stress? Basically, ethos is a set of unofficial rules that everyone follows, like maybe your school is a no-smoking zone, and so people all follow that rule, even though it is not forbidden to not smoke. Of course, there are consequences in disobeying that rule, but again, everyone follows that.
Speaking of moral nature and guiding beliefs of a group, what would happen in a community struck by disaster? Say the whole community is cut off from other people - no food coming in, no electricity, etc. Your modern community becomes a tribe, forced to survive by wits and intelligence. Now, if you watch Survivorman with Les Stroud, then you are okay; you will live. Jk! Anyways, of course, as a society today, immoral things such as killing one another, stealing, rape, etc, is all frowned upon, and there are laws set in place to make sure those actions are not prominent in every day life. So that being said, of course your community before this disaster, follows those rules, usually everyone does. But now, with death looming, what limitations are set by the laws? Murder? You'd be seeing people killing one another to survive, if worst comes to worst. What happens to this ethos? Is it completely shattered, or will people still follow it until death?
Of course, ever since growing up, you've had these laws beaten into your head. You don't murder, you do not steal, you do not do any immoral things, and being that it is beaten into your head that it is wrong, once a "sin" is committed, you feel guilt. If those "sins" were not wrong, and those thoughts were beaten in your head, you wouldn't feel [as] guilty (would you still feel guilty though? I am unsure, what might you think?). Anyways, this being said, killing another to survive, would guilt still appear? The ethos has apparently been broken, so the "veil" of guiltiness is not there anymore...or is it?
What are your thoughts on the matter?
[1] http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ethos (This is not properly cited, I am sorry about that. Trying to actually cite it properly, it did something funky, so I had to change it. Again, sorry) Ethos (noun)
the guiding beliefs of a person, group, or organization.
: the distinguishing character, sentiment, moral nature, or guiding beliefs of a person, group, or institution. [1]
Now that you know what ethos means, let's get to the question. How might the set ethos in a community change during times of difficulty and stress? Basically, ethos is a set of unofficial rules that everyone follows, like maybe your school is a no-smoking zone, and so people all follow that rule, even though it is not forbidden to not smoke. Of course, there are consequences in disobeying that rule, but again, everyone follows that.
Speaking of moral nature and guiding beliefs of a group, what would happen in a community struck by disaster? Say the whole community is cut off from other people - no food coming in, no electricity, etc. Your modern community becomes a tribe, forced to survive by wits and intelligence. Now, if you watch Survivorman with Les Stroud, then you are okay; you will live. Jk! Anyways, of course, as a society today, immoral things such as killing one another, stealing, rape, etc, is all frowned upon, and there are laws set in place to make sure those actions are not prominent in every day life. So that being said, of course your community before this disaster, follows those rules, usually everyone does. But now, with death looming, what limitations are set by the laws? Murder? You'd be seeing people killing one another to survive, if worst comes to worst. What happens to this ethos? Is it completely shattered, or will people still follow it until death?
Of course, ever since growing up, you've had these laws beaten into your head. You don't murder, you do not steal, you do not do any immoral things, and being that it is beaten into your head that it is wrong, once a "sin" is committed, you feel guilt. If those "sins" were not wrong, and those thoughts were beaten in your head, you wouldn't feel [as] guilty (would you still feel guilty though? I am unsure, what might you think?). Anyways, this being said, killing another to survive, would guilt still appear? The ethos has apparently been broken, so the "veil" of guiltiness is not there anymore...or is it?
What are your thoughts on the matter?
[1] http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ethos (This is not properly cited, I am sorry about that. Trying to actually cite it properly, it did something funky, so I had to change it. Again, sorry) |