Gligar13vids, ironically he despises Pokémon, and sonic the hedgehog, and is an absolute fan boy of Digimon and CoD. This, my fellow vizzed members, is his latest "review". https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7iViwn8ZImU&feature=results_video

hilarious, isn't it?

I agree with you. This guy absolutely sucks as a reviewer. He gives practically no real examples to support why things are 'bad'. What really made me laugh was when he said "Basically, he game is traveling around, slashing enemies, collecting items, using items, throwing objects, kaboom..... not that great'. First off, that pretty much explains the game play of pretty much 90% of video games ever made, so I guess he must think 90% of games are bad. 

rcarter2 : All he says is," I HATE THIS GAME! FOR NO REASON!" Soon, I'll be making a website for reviewing games, posting/watching videos, and blogging plus chatting, this guy would be instantly banned! 

All of you are correct. He is entitled to his own opinion of course, but he should use more solid evidence than, "OMGee, der graphics  are bad!!!!!11!!!shift!!" He should be fair and give solid evidence, or else he shouldn't review. If he is biased to different games, or hates specific games, and he doesn't try to be fair in his reviews, than his reviewing skill are poor and he should stop the making of his videos.

"Now, Zelda came out and people thought it was big and stuff, even though it wasn't um, you know, original. There were games that did the same thing before Zelda came out, but 'course nobody cares about 'em 'cuz they weren't made by Nintendo."

Because Zelda, while it may have taken elements from these other games (ie. Hydlide), Zelda did it a lot better, for the most part. Anyone who's played Hydlide will tell you that it's garbage. At least I thought so.

"You beat the game, you rescue Zelda, even though Link doesn't want to screw Zelda at all."

Why does that even matter? Granted, LttP isn't exactly plot-heavy, but still... How much worse can this "review" get?

"If this is one of the best games, the Super Nintendo is a crappy system [...] People are stupid, because they'd rather buy consoles, because their PC is a piece of garbage that can't run freaking Half-Life 1."

... Yeah, I can't do this anymore. I'm a minute into this, and it's terrible. This kid has no idea what he's saying, and is using zero evidence to support any of his half-baked claims. This isn't a review; this is flagrant flaming of a game for little reason other than the fact that it's as old as I am, and is therefore inferior to modern games like the numerous FPS games he's mentioned.

I'm half tempted to flag this video as "Hateful or Abusive Content."

I like how its called a review, yet the majority of it is him throwing plants around instead of, i dont know, playing?
And at least 3 times he stated, all it is is hit, throw, collect, boom.
Thats all your review is buddy.
I looked at another, he picks something and just repeats it throughout the video.

inb4 he's a registered member of Vizzed.

Well, somebody never watched Bambi.
(For those who haven't, yes, this comment totally fits with the conversation.)

---

I am rather confused by how the creator thinks that this video is even decent enough to post.

If you think this is bad you should watch his minecraft review (to save you from having to watch it I'll just tell you that, in a nutshell, it's the first time I actually cried because of a youtube video)

legacyme3 : So do I have permission to summon him here? PLEASE YES! PLEASE YES!

This guy is a joke. He is a sad excuse for a human being. He makes false statements to why the game is bad, and even if they were true, you wouldn't know it because he gives absolutely NO examples. "There's not much to the gameplay at all". That was the opposite of Link to The Past. There were tons of new items and mechanics to keep the gameplay fresh. "There were many games like Legend of Zelda before this game, but no one care because they weren't made by Nintendo" notice how: 1. This isn't true at all. 2. He doesn't list any examples, and he can't list them because this statement is not true.

This guy isn't serious, I can tell. Nobody is this stereotypical. I'm basically 100% sure that his reviews, as well as the comments and such that he posts, are just an act...

Don't think trolls would accept a YouTube partnership? He probably did it to seem more genuine. And it seems to have fooled a lot of people! When even some of the most gullible people I've met (who have also commentated on him) have said that's he's a troll, chances are he is one. If it looks like a troll, acts like a troll, and others say it's a troll, it's probably a troll.

can an admin/moderator please move this thread to the reviews section? I think it would fit in better there.

Apparently, this guy needs lessons on how to review. Why he keeps on reviewing, I don't really know.

freakyforrest9 : from what I can tell, he seems to be a youtube partner, meaning he only makes them for the money, and the attention. People like him are the scum of the earth, same as most other CoD fan boys.

lordpyromon: I knew he's a youtube  member, but still. The way I see it, he should just quit reviewing. Either that, or get lessons on how to review games. There's some websites on the Internet, like IGN, where you could read reviews. That's how you review.

Is this guy a troll? From his description of the game it sounds as though he's only played through to the second screen. He doesn't provide evidence for anything he claims, and generally seems like he doesn't know what he's talking about.

These Bad reviewers are ticking me off.....
They say a bunch of Bad statements of Games, and they don't even get into good parts.....
And this guy is worse than xXMyteriousManXx......(sorta)
And does he have any evidence? NOPE.
Like everyone said, this guy should really stop reviewing.
-edit- Ok, this is the last straw.... THIS WAS MY FAV GAME  http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=makEY47Mscc