Register  |  Login Retro Game Room  |  Board  |  Downloads  |  Memberlist  |  Video Game Room Staff  |  About Us  |  Help Center  
  Views: 1,305,891,161     11-25-14 03:53 PM  

New Additions to the Oxford English Dictionary




Thread closed

New Additions to the Oxford English Dictionary
- Evolution or Degradation of the English Language?
Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread

Posted on 04-02-11 12:45 PM Elara is Offline     Post: 16 words - (ID: 359527) - Post Rating: 0 - Report Abuse | Link
Elara
Level: 104


POSTS: 1702/3368
POST EXP: 284458
LVL EXP: 11790720
CP: 814.2
VIZ: 185184
http://www.oed.com/public/latest/latest-update/

Brief synopsis of above link: They are adding things like "LOL", "Wags", "Dot-bomb" and "<3" to the OED. Do you think that this is a honest portrayal of the evolution of the language, or is allowing such internet terms into the definitive lexicon of the English language only permitting its degradation? I don't think that many of these terms should be allowed legitimacy that the OED gives them... I mean, would you allow such colloquialisms in an essay for an English class?

Now, this is not to say that I disagree with every change they have made that is listed in that link. I think the addition of cultural food names is good, as is the addition of the Aboriginal name for the didgeridoo. Those things make since... things like BFF and fnarr fnarr do not.

Dark Link
Dark Elf Goddess
Penguins Fan

Affected by 'Laziness'

Position: Elite
Since: 12-08-04
Last Post: 39 days
Last Active: 16 hours

Sponsor

Posted on 04-02-11 01:12 PM warmaker is Offline     Post: 140 words - (ID: 359544) - Post Rating: 0 - Report Abuse | Link
warmaker
Level: 74


POSTS: 159/1994
POST EXP: 208916
LVL EXP: 3636195
CP: 3302.1
VIZ: 42290
Those words are completely acceptable and have such every-day use they require a nod from the dictionary. They're our language and we (not me personally) universally use them. There isn't a right or wrong word to put in the dictionary but if words are vernacular, add them.

When people started referring to motion pictures, films, and 'pictures' with the slang word "movie," art critics, language professionals, and colleges were in an uproar that such terrible vocabulary could be added to the English language. No one thinks a second thought about seeing a movie.

Give it ten years. LOL will be no big deal. We'll be complaining about something else being added. Our words change, evolve, and grow all the time. English is a vibrant and living thing. You can't stop it; you can only recognize its changes.

Add the words.

Mancubus

Trusted Member
Affected by 'Laziness'

Position: Trusted
Since: 05-02-10
From: Honolulu, HI
Last Post: 1 day
Last Active: 9 hours

Posted on 04-02-11 10:30 PM Elara is Offline     Post: 7 words - (ID: 360081) - Post Rating: 0 - Report Abuse | Link
Elara
Level: 104


POSTS: 1704/3368
POST EXP: 284458
LVL EXP: 11790720
CP: 814.2
VIZ: 185184
But symbols? What next, the smiley face?

Dark Link
Dark Elf Goddess
Penguins Fan

Affected by 'Laziness'

Position: Elite
Since: 12-08-04
Last Post: 39 days
Last Active: 16 hours

Posted on 04-03-11 05:14 PM Bobbynibbles is Offline     Post: 2 words - (ID: 360709) - Post Rating: 0 - Report Abuse | Link
Bobbynibbles
Level: 48


POSTS: 479/706
POST EXP: 33365
LVL EXP: 771834
CP: 0.7
VIZ: 83
Elara : <3 and LOL are not words, they are just internet slang. OED is submitting to the degradation of the English language.
Who are you to wave your finger? So full of it Eye balls deep in muddy waters F**kin' hypocrite
Affected by 'Laziness'

Position:
Since: 04-07-10
From: Florida
Last Post: 1212 days
Last Active: 1211 days

Posted on 04-03-11 05:19 PM NotJon is Offline     Post: 17 words - (ID: 360712) - Post Rating: 0 - Report Abuse | Link
NotJon
Level: 97


POSTS: 2352/3496
POST EXP: 180797
LVL EXP: 9198373
CP: 60.9
VIZ: 126244
Technically, LOL is an abbreviation. It's commonly used. I don't see why it should not get in. <3 may be pushing it though. I mean, I use it, but idk (laugh out loud).

Sea Snake
More Not than the average Jon
Affected by 'Laziness'

Position: Elite
Since: 06-24-09
From: Paterson, NJ
Last Post: 690 days
Last Active: 656 days

Posted on 04-03-11 07:54 PM Sephitard9001 is Offline     Post: 70 words - (ID: 360845) - Post Rating: 0 - Report Abuse | Link
Sephitard9001
Level: 39


POSTS: 217/470
POST EXP: 27493
LVL EXP: 380563
CP: 452.3
VIZ: 38380
Why not, you know what I mean? If people who speak English see these terms posted on the internet, and for some reason look it up in a dictionary instead of google or something, they would be able to discover the meaning. I really don't care WHAT they put in the dictionary, it's not like it changes anything in the long-run anyway. Ancient Egyptians used symbols to communicate, how is <3 any different?
Make love against the evils!
Affected by 'Laziness'

Position: Trusted
Since: 01-30-11
From: AMERICA
Last Post: 252 days
Last Active: 13 days

Posted on 04-04-11 01:26 AM Elara is Offline     Post: 9 words - (ID: 360955) - Post Rating: 0 - Report Abuse | Link
Elara
Level: 104


POSTS: 1725/3368
POST EXP: 284458
LVL EXP: 11790720
CP: 814.2
VIZ: 185184
Ancient Egyptians used symbols because hieroglyphs were their language. <3 exists because people are too lazy to write the word love. Would you say it is acceptable to have <3 or LOL in an English paper you write for school? That is why it should not be in a dictionary... online reference is fine, the Oxford English is not.

Dark Link
Dark Elf Goddess
Penguins Fan

Affected by 'Laziness'

Position: Elite
Since: 12-08-04
Last Post: 39 days
Last Active: 16 hours

Posted on 04-04-11 09:10 AM noelia is Offline     Post: 179 words - (ID: 361021) - Post Rating: 0 - Report Abuse | Link
noelia
Level: 141


POSTS: 5842/8748
POST EXP: 304654
LVL EXP: 33895460
CP: 1931.8
VIZ: 431579
In my mind every language that it's still in use (not ancient-dead ones), are like "alive" things. I mean they grow up and change (in grammar and vocabulary), just like anything that it's alive.

Example- In my language there used to be 2 different versions of the same language, till 1975. On the one side was those who thought that we should keep the "clean" and proper language as the official one (note: nobody was using it in their personal life though), and on the other hand there were people, who believed that both the official language and the speaking one, should be the same. Well, this was a fight for many decades and on 1975, they've decided to use the same version of language for every purpose.

But these "words" (LOL, ZOMG etc) don't belong to "real life", I mean they are more for interent purposes and fun, so maybe they should have thought it twice before they added them.

Generally, I'm in favor of adding new words in languages, but with this issue, I'm a bit cautious.




1st Place in the July 2010 VCS Competition!

Affected by Tomb Raider syndrome
Affected by 'Laziness'

Position: Elite
Since: 03-15-10
From: Croft Manor
Last Post: 1015 days
Last Active: 1015 days

Posted on 04-04-11 09:17 AM thenumberone is Online     Post: 28 words - (ID: 361027) - Post Rating: 0 - Report Abuse | Link
thenumberone
Level: 119


POSTS: 49/6314
POST EXP: 360106
LVL EXP: 18394173
CP: 4602.1
VIZ: 311222
that is stupid, they arent real words, its fine to use them but thats like me putting a picture of a smiley in and saying it means happy.


Bleeding Heart Liberal
Affected by 'Carpal Tunnel Syndrome'

Position: Elite
Since: 03-22-11
From:
Last Post: 14 hours
Last Active: 3 min.
Add to favorites | "RSS" Feed | Next newer thread | Next older thread
Vizzed Board - Debate / Logic / News Discussion
New Additions to the Oxford English Dictionary - Evolution or Degradation of the English Language?
| | Thread closed

  Site Info  Sponsor  
  Vizzed.com © was created, designed, coded by & is property of:
David Auchampach
All Rights Reserved 2002 - 2014
Powered By: Vizzed Board, Acmlm Board and Adeon Dev.
Affiliates: get-your-rom.com - mybiblegames.com -  


Search Engine Keywords:
new additions to the oxford english dictionary (1),  

Page rendered in 0.222 seconds.