Remove Ad, Sign Up
Register to Remove Ad
Register to Remove Ad
Remove Ad, Sign Up
Register to Remove Ad
Register to Remove Ad
Register
Signup for Free!
-More Features-
-Far Less Ads-
☷ Vizzed.com Play Retro Games Vizzed Board Video Games Game Music Market Minecraft Radio Widgets Virtual Bible
☷ Register   Login  
New Posts All Threads Your Threads Contribution Points News and Updates Active Users User Ranks
About   Users   Help
Users & Guests Online
On Page: 1
Directory: 2 & 49
Entire Site: 8 & 1387
Page Staff: pennylessz, pokemon x, Barathemos, tgags123, alexanyways, RavusRat,
05-12-24 07:24 PM

Forum Links

Related Threads
Coming Soon

Thread Information

Views
1,557
Replies
3
Rating
1
Status
CLOSED
Thread
Creator
IceWave04
11-02-05 04:50 PM
Last
Post
BigBob85
11-27-05 04:07 PM
Additional Thread Details
Views: 119
Today: 0
Users: 0 unique

Thread Actions

Thread Closed
New Thread
New Poll
Order
 

Austraian Laws: New terror laws

 

11-02-05 04:50 PM
IceWave04 is Offline
Link
| ID: 38476 | 83 Words

IceWave04
Level: 134

POSTS: 1663/4864
POST EXP: 234892
LVL EXP: 28406171
CP: 81.0
VIZ: 24732

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
Thread title sums it up, do you thinks it alright for local authorities to have a 'shoot to kill' right, in the name of terrorisim anyway.
They cant just go kill anyone.
I agree with this law, this does make us a safer country, and if some dumb arse gets killed for pretending to be a terrorst than its there own stupid fault. Thats what i think anyway, what do you think? (You dont have to be Australian to take part in this)
Thread title sums it up, do you thinks it alright for local authorities to have a 'shoot to kill' right, in the name of terrorisim anyway.
They cant just go kill anyone.
I agree with this law, this does make us a safer country, and if some dumb arse gets killed for pretending to be a terrorst than its there own stupid fault. Thats what i think anyway, what do you think? (You dont have to be Australian to take part in this)
Trusted Member

Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 03-01-05
Last Post: 5376 days
Last Active: 5330 days

11-03-05 05:10 AM
chain_gang_princess is Offline
Link
| ID: 38503 | 107 Words

Level: 29


POSTS: 67/142
POST EXP: 4158
LVL EXP: 139357
CP: 9.0
VIZ: 3435

Likes: 1  Dislikes: 0
I reckon its stupid.... what if the person didnt do it n the "authorities" suspisions arent right? should they be able to get away with killing someone wrongfully accussed, or someone who looks a certain way (eg looks iraqi) n r in the wrongplace at the wrong time.... Theres enuff corupt cops as it is, y give em the right to kill someone coz they think their up 2 sumthing!!!
Now if they have evidence to prove em guilty, y not use the old fashion way... raid em n arrest em, use pepper spray, tranqs if ya really have to...
Why give terrorists the satisfaction of death?
I reckon its stupid.... what if the person didnt do it n the "authorities" suspisions arent right? should they be able to get away with killing someone wrongfully accussed, or someone who looks a certain way (eg looks iraqi) n r in the wrongplace at the wrong time.... Theres enuff corupt cops as it is, y give em the right to kill someone coz they think their up 2 sumthing!!!
Now if they have evidence to prove em guilty, y not use the old fashion way... raid em n arrest em, use pepper spray, tranqs if ya really have to...
Why give terrorists the satisfaction of death?
Member
"The Princess"


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 10-17-05
Location: Middle Of Nowhere --- Australia
Last Post: 6480 days
Last Active: 6395 days

Post Rating: 1   Liked By: jnisol,

11-27-05 01:19 PM
John is Offline
Link
| ID: 39356 | 36 Words

John
Level: 148


POSTS: 5512/6085
POST EXP: 243174
LVL EXP: 39984805
CP: 247.4
VIZ: 66576

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
It gives them the right to shoot and kill. This doesn't mean they are going to shoot and kill everytime. They may or may not need to excersise this right. I suppose its a judgement issue.
It gives them the right to shoot and kill. This doesn't mean they are going to shoot and kill everytime. They may or may not need to excersise this right. I suppose its a judgement issue.
Vizzed Elite
Insert Custom Title Here


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 12-07-04
Location: Wisconsin
Last Post: 5025 days
Last Active: 444 days

11-27-05 04:07 PM
BigBob85 is Offline
Link
| ID: 39365 | 150 Words

BigBob85
Level: 151

POSTS: 1210/6381
POST EXP: 217397
LVL EXP: 42931835
CP: 170.6
VIZ: 49768

Likes: 0  Dislikes: 0
I think this is a good rule. There not going to bust into someones house, n start shooting everyone cos they think there a terrorist... Thats how some 3rd world contries do it, they just rock up in a tank, and level the house.

But look at that guy in the UK, he was gunned down on suspicion of terrorism, so it does have its bad points.

If they wana do something to Australians, give us back our gun rights.

But say the terrorist has heaps of explosives on him, and in his bag. Police say STOP!, and he dosnt, so they chase him, and then they shoot him. Or this could happen, Police say STOP!, and he dosnt, so they chase him, abit down the path the terrorist thinks he cant getaway, so he detonates there, instantly killing 20 civilians, and wounding heaps. What scenario would be better...?
I think this is a good rule. There not going to bust into someones house, n start shooting everyone cos they think there a terrorist... Thats how some 3rd world contries do it, they just rock up in a tank, and level the house.

But look at that guy in the UK, he was gunned down on suspicion of terrorism, so it does have its bad points.

If they wana do something to Australians, give us back our gun rights.

But say the terrorist has heaps of explosives on him, and in his bag. Police say STOP!, and he dosnt, so they chase him, and then they shoot him. Or this could happen, Police say STOP!, and he dosnt, so they chase him, abit down the path the terrorist thinks he cant getaway, so he detonates there, instantly killing 20 civilians, and wounding heaps. What scenario would be better...?
Vizzed Elite
Member Of The Year 07


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 12-09-04
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Last Post: 1620 days
Last Active: 1255 days

Links

Page Comments


This page has no comments

Adblocker detected!

Vizzed.com is very expensive to keep alive! The Ads pay for the servers.

Vizzed has 3 TB worth of games and 1 TB worth of music.  This site is free to use but the ads barely pay for the monthly server fees.  If too many more people use ad block, the site cannot survive.

We prioritize the community over the site profits.  This is why we avoid using annoying (but high paying) ads like most other sites which include popups, obnoxious sounds and animations, malware, and other forms of intrusiveness.  We'll do our part to never resort to these types of ads, please do your part by helping support this site by adding Vizzed.com to your ad blocking whitelist.

×