all sexuality is family friendly. it is a natural part of life, and you should never hide this fact from your child. the choice of who to sex, is irrelevant. that should also be made clear. a child should always be aware that his parents love one another and should see them being affectionate. otherwise you attach shame to affection, and inadvertently tell the child to be ashamed of their love, and hide it. 

and for the record, youre FAR more likely to be molested/raped in a heterosexual household than a homosexual household. so by that respect alone, homosexuality is more family friendly than heterosexuality, until straight people stop raping their children so often(it happens CONSTANTLY).

first off, it will be billions of years before this planet dies, unless we were to somehow completely remove the core of the earth. THAT is what keeps the world moving, keeps gravity in place, keeps the land shifting, and is responsible for the occasional change in surface area.

second off, youre saying this as though were some magical species that just popped up, and were somehow different than the others on this planet. we are not. every creature kills other creatures, and over time some things die off entirely. its nature. deal with it.

our "bulldozing" is natural. our building and tearing down, is natural. its something that every living creature does to one degree or another, we are simply the best suited for survival, of the creatures on this planet. the endangerment or extinction of a creature is meaningless. this is how life goes on. energy must be consumed and converted so that life can continue. creatures HAVE to die. the earth HAS to be torn up, and the trees cut down. if we dont do it, the earth will. or the asteroids and comets, etc.

even our "weapons of mass destruction" wouldnt have any REAL longterm effect aside from -maybe- killing most of the life on the surface of the planet. we could not contaminate this earth with radiation to the point that it could not recover, and a few hundred years is nothing to the planet. 

we are NO different than gorillas, whales, sharks, eagles, or ants, except we do what we do much better and at a much larger scale then they do what they do. disgusted by humans? well youd better just start hating EVERY CREATURE EVER because we all do the exact same things.our "destruction" we cause is the same as it always has been, by every other creature. its nothing to care about, because this my friend is life.

oh for the record, google is your friend, and will prevent you from using words you dont actually understand. contempt is not the same thing as content.

just for the record, i smoke constantly and have for at least 10 years now. im also very much....off...in the head. marijuana helps me manage my "symptoms" far better then risperidone ever did, and i wouldnt go on the other mind numbing soul destroying drugs they use for "mental illness" under any circumstance.

though i have bad memory, i always have. long before i started using any drugs. i tend to be more well spoken then nearly anyone i ever meet, more knowledgeable about nearly any subject that dosent encompass "twerking" or what the newest hot fashion is. i tend to react better, and more quickly, than those around me(not while im high) whenever an event occurs that is unexpected and requires immediate or fast reaction to. none of your copy/pasted marijuana propoganda applies to me. why is that? why is an insane person apparently the only person who weed dosent turn into a brain dead drooling moron watching cartoons while hallucinating that hes flying and the world is full of colors that arent really there? oh right. because    EVERY negative effect youve read about weed aside from slightly delayed motor skills while under the influence, is complete and utter garbage.

@smokin purple
you joined this site 50 days ago, and named your account after the act of smoking purple haze. i highly doubt youve quit using anything.
but your personal experience with quiting a drug means nothing. were not saying it is addictive to YOU, though for a time it was, or youd have not continued use after the initial smoking session. were talking about addiction overall. anything is addictive.also please stop throwing around ellipsis if you dont know how to properly use them. they are not periods or commas. there is nothing more annoying then that. nothing.

SmokinPurple :

yes, it is addictive. just like caffeine, nicotine, heroin, aspirin, and any other drug. even those that have no seeming effect are to some, addictive. addiction is a thing of the mind. while some things are more addictive, nothing is without addiction. 


lets all try and stop making baseless nonsenseical claims shall we? this would go much more smoothly if some of you people would pick up a book, or do some private research once in a while. especially when youre talking about a topic that all of you against it, seem to have no actual experience with, and no knowledge aside from what you have heard from potheads(not the best source of information), or the tv.

Vincent1875 :  it is difficult honestly, to find any form of proof you would consider adequate. your most likely source for truth would be either some random website that theres no reason to believe, or some form of major media outlet, who are almost all owned by rupert murdoch, who controls a good portion of the media in every country. if you can honestly watch any form of media that he owns and say that they dont project pure propaganda 90% of the time, youre a fool. as for "keeping things secret" nothing was kept secret. they let everyone say whatever they wanted about what was going on, and planted a bunch of nonsense themselves to increase confusion over the confusing war. youll generally need to search library records of very old, rural libraries, to find any form of documentation of what was actually going on, and even then youll just be reading what someone else says and believing or not. either way, there is no proof for either of our views on this as we cannot witness events firsthand. but my point remains completely valid on what is necessary for peace.

Vincent1875 : incorrect in every way. i am not against any religion. i am however against the hebrews that live in isreal, and control the nations of the world into going to war for them. there is a vast difference between someone who follows a religion, and someone who is part of a closed group of people who breed hatred everywhere they go, and always have. yes, i am very pro hitler. dont get me wrong, i dont support what he did, but it WAS necessary. the hebrews were ruining germany, and had already done the same in many ways to every other country in the world. these people would have to be eliminated, because as they have shown throughout the past few thousand years, if you give them the benefit of the doubt and leave them alone after chasing them off, they will come back in 50 years, owning your entire country through debt you unknowingly accumulated through the proxies that said hebrews have setup in every thing that they can.

i dont support killing, but i do understand that there are times when it is necesary. and for the record, hitler did NOT try eliminating them first. he collected the jews(it was difficult to distinguish who was actually hebrew(race, not religon) and who was just related to jews(religion, not race), so they were all lumped together. they were shipped away from germany via trains, and then they were shipped back by some countries, because they didnt want them, and some made countries start interfering with germany, and thus causing a war. you need to understand that the majority of what is reported as happening in ww2, is complete lies. alot of it is propoganda made up during and after the war, to justify starting a war. germany did not start the war.

the only way world peace could possibly work, is if the world was all under the same rule. a single empire where all people are free to their way of life, and the countries within said empire could not interject their beliefs into another countries.

take for example what we do to the middle east, supposedly. we dont like how alot of countries over there run . we dont like how people are treated, how certain situations are handled, etc. so what do we do? we kill people. we invade and force them o accept OUR way of life. something people fail to understand, is just because we see something as being evil, does not make it so. if the majority of those people didnt want the rules they must abide by, they would not be living where they are. its never difficult to just leave. even with children, its not difficult. we did it before and can continue to do it, if your unhappy with the lives of your children, you guys GTFO, you dont stay to risk being killed for something you dont believe in.

but we dont have that. we have countless countries forced into a seemingly stable peace, where any time the bigger countries decide its time to start killing smaller countries again, nobody gives a s***. the only way, would be for someone to impose peace. to impose imperial rule, and enforce any breach of peace with total annihilation of those involved. thats not to say nuke the country because some guys in army fatigues attacked another country, but punish all of those directly involved. even the murderers who were "just doing their job". no mercy can be spared, for peace to work there must be an utter lack of mercy. a complete lack of conscience. someone must be willing, and able, to take total control, while forcing everyone to not respect, but tolerate others. they must be willing and able to enforce infractions, and they must be willing and able to accept the blood that will be on their hands. 

everytime someone comes along willing to do what must be done, the world unites against him. the last we had was Der Fuhrer, and when he tried to liberate us from the ones who own the world through debt, the rest of the world decided they would rather keep their pathetic lives of bowing to a master because something someone else did hundreds or thousands of years ago. we will never have peace, because this act would have to be done again, as every nation has tried, but done successfully. people are too conditioned, and the hebrews now have their own "country" so nobody can see the kind of people they are anymore. 

ding ding ding. u.n. it is.  1000 Viz do be yours.

sloanstar1000 : thats because most of these people are little children. nothing wrong with that, but they are still in the stage where they believe everything they have been told, without ever seeing evidence to show the truth in someones words. hopefully this thread will cause a few of them to actually stop for a second, and do some research into these falsities they perpetuate.

derek56767 : the vast majority of what is taught in american grade schools and highschool, is not fact. most of it is interpretation on past events, which obviously cannot be fact, just poin of view. alot of what is taught is outright lies, like(dunno if they still teech this) that there are only 3 states of matter, or that the "founding fathers" consulted with the actual american citizens before writing up a vague document stating peoples "rights". 

that being said, i see no reason for evolution, a proven fact, to be omitted due to a lack of understanding on your part on the facts.

the difference in speed of an object, and speed of its atoms movement is a very large thing. im sorry that i have to be 100% specific with you since you see to not understand otherwise. the faster an object is moving through space, and the heavier it is (thats mass in case you dont now what that actually is.), the more of a gravitational force it will have. i couldnt tell you the exact formulea to figure this out, and i doubt any other human could yet either. rotation also helps to increase gravitational forces. im not sourcing anything for you. i have no need to as i dont honestly care what you believe. do some research if youre genuinely interested and open minded to the idea that you ight not know anywhere near what you think you do.


science's very purpose is to prove and disprove. it has done so time and time again. we have proved for a fact that you can run a piece of metal on rubber at 50 miles an hour, with 4 people sitting safely inside. weve proved that gravity exists, that there isnt some magical creature in some cloud city holding us down on the ground. we have also proved that creatures change every generation, by small amounts or huge leaps depending on what they breed with. im sure you put great store into your artificial knowledge gleamed from facebook posts and discovery channel specials, but some of us actually know what were talking about. 

Light Knight :

i understand fully what you are saying. but the people who are arguing it are arguing essentially that it is an unproven idea, and that is their reasoning for saying it shouldnt be taught. they have no REAL argument, so lacking an understanding in the object of discussion they chime in with generic googled answers. i know that it is a scientific theory, which is the same thing as a theory just in the science universe. while tese things are theory, they are also fact. i suppose i should be more clear and say that they arent ONLY theory, but were talking to kids who dont understand the meanings of the words they are using, and thin a theory means its just an idea and has nothing to back it up nor can it be fact. so i just dumb it down a bit for them and feed their ignorance in the proper usage of the english language.

Traduweise : wrong again. the reason i said rotating bodies with large mass, is because that is what is generally thought of as gravity. the large forces of it that hold planets in place, and things on planets. its understood to an extent where it is fro, it comes from mass and movement. without movement, there is no gravity, and with lesser mass or movement, there is lesser gravity. we dont have to understand exactly what it is to know where it comes from, but it sees the extent of your knowledge is that which is taught to grade school students, on this subject. you are making statements that rely on heavily outdated ways of thought, that obviously discount or refuse to look for, the research that has been done extensively into this subject. gravity is not a theory. exactly what it is as an energy form is up to great debate, but it is a proven fact that gravity exists, to an extent what it does, and where it comes from. 

as for evolution, it is not a theory. you people need to stop listening to everything you hear on tv. evolution is a proven fact. how it happens is also proven, though there is always the possibility that it could happen in more ways. procreation is evolution. if you cannot wrap your head around this simple fact, you have no business making any judgments on evolution since you are clearly discounting the fact that everything that is defined as evolution, happens from breeding.

we know exactly where gravity comes from. it comes from large bodies which rotate. the rotation of a large amount of mass is what causes gravity. this is proven fact. it is not unprovable theory. 

@ thenumberone  there was no context to take your statement from. it was just a statement out of nowhere to mae the appearance you know what a theory is, when you just chose to use one of the several definitions for theory. you dont get to pick and choose, and its already been discussed by someone else on this page WHAT KIND of theories these are. they are not regular theories like you make about the world around you based on singular observation. these are excepted "theories" which have been proven by fact, time and time again. including gravity. and yes, a child IS evolution. do you think that animals just randomly grow genetic changes? some do, a very few, but not many. most evolution happens because the creation of new genes by the combination of differing genes during breeding. evolution dosent happen like in pokemon, where after eating enough other animals and being old enough they magically transform into a new creature.

i a personally against war. but there are times when it is necessary to survive. there are people out there who want nothing more then to take everything you have, regardless of its value, simply to take it. going to war because you dont agree with what someone is doing to people who have nothing to do with you, is wrong, unless they as for your aid. you have no right to force your ideals upon other people, and if they want to deal with it themselves, or cannot do so enough to as for help, then they get whats coming to them. the weak die, its the law of nature. 


as for "terrorism" that is nothing more than a mask with no true face beneath, thrown at anyone who our governments deem to be a threat in some way. these governments are of course manipulated into doing so by certain people who rule the world from Isreal, because a government isnt an entity. its just a group of people who you listen to.  they tell you there are terrorists in afganistan, and youre all gung ho for them to go over and slaughter a million people just trying to live their lives. they tell you the syrians are terrorists, and youre fine with us helping the jews next door continue to bomb peoples houses like weve been doing for over a decade. war is acceptable only to bring down countries like ours. we are ruled by evil people, who for some reason being very few, control everything you do and say, through debt.

it depends more on the person than the religion. if one realizes that their teachings from ancient times are nothing more then a guide to tell them how to live, then perhaps it could coincide with science. theres nothing wrong with believing you should do good to others, or whatever your morals are, and if it took a religion to teach you them than whats the problem?

oh wait. most religions teach you to murder people and enslave them, where as science teaches you to disect already dead people, and try to cure their diseases. no. they cannot possibly coincide.

well it depends. if youre talking about how we feel about other people committing suicide, it dosent mater. its not our lives, and how we feel about life has nothing to do with anything.

as for myself, i have no inherent desire to die right now, but when i do, it will be by jumping off a nice tall cliff with a beautiful view of an ocean, forest, or both if possible.

there is no reincarnation. the fact is that our consciousness is nothing more then electrical signals traveling through our body and brain, and the brain turning those signals into something we can understand. when you die, you die. its done. your energy will remain, but its not really energy in the sense of some magical floating aura. the energy, that gets broken down and built up into and with electricity's help, is your body. the muscles tissue, bones, blood, etc. that gets broken down by various factors like animals and the elements, and your energy converts into something else, but that energy will never be "you" again.

there is no "you" once you die. so live your life now, and when you have regrets, cast them aside. there is nothing waiting for you after this.

this sittuation is not a matter of lying. by not answering the question, thats what you did. you didnt answer. you have no obligation to tell anyone anything, and some jelly beans you ate from the kitchen isnt exactly stealing. you live there, the food is for you too, so theres no problem.

as for lying without saying anything, the only way you could do so was if you conveyed something in sign language, writing it down, etc. you would have to give some form of answer, and it be untruthful. that is the only way to lie.

as an insane person i can only answer this question from the first point of view, but its not that bad being insane. sure it depends on exactly WHAT is wrong wth you, and i dont mean the diagnoses. a diagnoses is meaningless, its just used to bill a patient. without one, they cannot do so. the truth of the matter is, that being insane is no different from being "sane".

one lives life, and experiences various facets of it. this does not change by being "insane". take me for example, for years i struggled with reality as a child. i heard, and sometimes saw things i didnt understand. i felt things that couldnt be explained, and would sometimes spell various scents or taste something, when there would be no reason to. i forced my way through that to come to an equilibrium that gives me a sort of lucid yet blurred state of mind. 

insanity is nothing more than a term deemed upon those who do not conform to what we consider a "normal" person. its not a real term, its a loose term that has no true definition. crazy, insane, mad, nuts, wacko, whatever. they have no meaning. if you wish to as a question like this you need to FIRST define what you mean. dont use a loose term that has no meaning and leave it up to the interpretation of those reading it. what is your definition? people who are so dangerous that they have to be locked up in a padded room? murderers? rapists? the homeless guy sitting downtown with a cardboard sign that dosent say anything, mumbling to himself?