I personally do like MW2, but I'm waiting to play Battlefield 2 before I say it's my favorite.

Yes it has it's fair share of problem and yes the 7 year old kids are annoying, which is why making the angry them off by hunting them down is still hilarious XD

You just heart their little high pitched voices scream into the mic like morons and EVERYONE gets a laugh

I liked DKC2 because of the awesome roller coaster level and the glide ability, those were awesome, plus it was a darker game and more fun and challengin than the first

Still Got to give props to the original

Thank you, I'll be sure to do that

I like all 3, but not Yu-Gi-Oh as much as I used to

I thought Bioshock was a fun game with a rally interesting storyline, but Dead Space had hard to aim controls, and it took a while for the storyline to actually take off.

It's not the fact that there are too many of them, if a company can actually manage to make 13 sequels to a game that are all good, then good for them, but what usually happens is that they try to do something the same way but better, so they work on the faults of the last game, but forget about the parts that made it shine and the faults of fixing that faults, which more often than not leads to a bad sequel.

For example, Starfox's 1, 2 & 64 were all good games because they stuck to their guns and didn't try to be innovative. Then along came command with it's new style of play and where is Starfox now?

In the end, the only reason people want a sequel is they want to play more of the original, which is what a sequel should be, not like what Mario is trying to do (Trust me, at this point they are only getting by on namesake alone, with the exception of the New Super Mario Bros. Wii, which if you noticed went back to the original format and was AWESOME).

Now I'm not saying that you should just slap a new storyline on the same game and ship it out, because that's also boring, but if you notice, the only things that changed in the original Mario games and the New Super Mario Bros Wii were things that didn't effect the CORE of the game, they just made it more fun to play.

Wow. Sorry for ranting

I'd say it would have to be in FF4 when you beat the guy you think is the final boos and some dude comes out of nowhere and is the final boss. I don't have a problem with the Aerith's death because it's an important part of the story, and FF7 wouldn't be as good of game without it.

I'd have to say Yellow because it's the only one where you can easily own all 3 starter Pokemon of the originals. Which is freakin' awesome.

Blue devil without question, it's like the nintendog, but with the bility to actually KILL you.

I like the Xbox 360, it has a decent range of games (althoguh a little heavy on the FPS side), and with project Natal coming out soon, it will have motion control to rival the Wii's (Hopefully)

The PS3 is too expensive and for the price they charge, it might as well be bulletproof, in addition to the lack of unique games, doesn't make for a good purchase, except if you want God of War 3 (which I do ).

And the Wii is a system for csual gamers, with few games for hardcore gamers (Although they are admittedly coming out with a lot more than in the beginning).

So in the end I would have to say Xbox 360

I'm Nick and I'm new here, anything I should know before I jump into this forum?