I think they should have to serve them if it's day to day service. After all if every food establishment place in your city refused to serve you then you'd starve to death. Serving them if they walk into the store has nothing to do with their sexual preferences(unless they want them to bake a gay themed cake). However, they shouldn't be made to do things like cater weddings which can clearly be said to be against their beliefs because you're forcing them to participate in a gay wedding. A wedding service is a luxury.

That doesn't make them the real villains. It just means that they're not ideal heroes. They're not the people creating the problems. They just solve them on their own flawed terms.

Well, there are some problems with the Electoral Collage but the winner of the popular vote losing isn't really something I consider a problem since we're not a democracy. It's not like this is a new system. You know how the rules work. If you settle down in a high population state then your voting power is weaker in the national election. On the other hand states have a large amount of autonomy to run themselves so it's not like the president is the absolute ruler.

Saying what is and isn't feminism seems like a waste of time since everyone seems to have their own definition of it and practice it differently. There is no real feminism

I don't think pregnancy itself is viewed as bad so much as unplanned pregnancy.

Hey folks. Do you have a crush who's a fat*** and you can't figure out how to get their attention? Good news! We have the perfect thing for you!

Recommended use instructions: Use near bug zapper or have a fly swatter or RAID within arms' reach .

legacyme3 : On the other hand it can be said that those are the people who actually built the nation into what it is. A 18 year old who hasn't done anything at all for the country should have more say than a 65 year old who has spent 40+ years working and such? They could just counter it by saying that young people who haven't spent a certain amount of time in the workforce or military shouldn't be allowed to vote either.

How dramatic. I don't think a hatred of immigrants is anything new. They come in and take the low paying jobs and get hated by the people who's jobs they're taking. The Irish, Chinese, Mexicans, etc. have all gotten some of that. The sky isn't suddenly fallen. America will be fine. If anything I wouldn't be opposed to changing some of the laws we have in regards to immigrants. The fact is people have been blatantly taking advantage of some of our laws. If I recall correctly the criteria of being born in America makes you a citizen was made to give ex slaves citizenship. Now people from all over come here to give birth. It accomplished its purpose, it's pretty outdated, and should be gotten rid of.

I think I probably could. It's in our blood. Randomly stabbing a person to death just to see if you can might not be possible but put them in a warlike situation and history has shown that people will find the resolve. I also think some ways of killing people are easier than others. Stabbing them to death is probably harder than detonating a bomb from down the street.

One Piece easily takes it for me. The amount of work and creativity put into One Piece far outstrips the other two.

1. Setting? Dragon Ball and Naruto both manage to move their characters around and show off different locations but it pales in comparison to One Piece where every arc is a new unique location.

2. Fights? All three have good fights. Naruto and One Piece pull ahead because of the unique abilities of the characters though. Dragon Ball slowed down on having unique abilities and moved towards who can throw more energy at the other. In the end One Piece also takes the cake here though. Devil Fruits give everybody completely different fighting styles even if they practice the same martial arts like CP9.

3. Build up period? Basically how entertaining is it when they're not fighting? One Piece is hilarious and so it gets a lot of points there. Naruto and DBZ have a lot of training arcs in comparison.

Anyway I think the fact that people say things like Naruto and DBZ should have ended after Pain and Freeza show that overall One Piece is stronger. Those two hit a high point and then kind of dragged on while One Piece is becoming increasingly more interesting.

awesomeguy279 : Probably cut off our trade agreements with Mexico which would cost them more money than it would take to build a wall. America has enough economy influence in the Americas to put pressure on them.

Also there is a clear reason to build a wall. Immigrants coming from the southern border have been a huge problem for the country. Democrats don't really care because they tend to vote for Democrats but it really hurts the poor people and teens in the country when people who will work for very little money take the low paying jobs. They also have a habit of sending money they earn out of the country to their families back home which drains money out of the economy that would have otherwise been spent in America. The question is whether building a wall will stop the problem. I think it's better than doing nothing.

I don't plan on voting but from my perspective Trump is more of a symbol that represents everything that people are tired of seeing in politicians and society. That's why he's popular. He's speaks his mind even if what he's saying is unpopular. Thus he's anti political correctness. He has his own money and can't be bought by businesses like most politicians are so he's anti money in politics. He doesn't really have a great amount of allies in the republican party so he's anti establishment. He's the grenade that you throw into the water when you're tired of not catching any fish. Our government has reached the point where businesses run everything. They buy the politicians and so it doesn't really matter what the voters want. Trump is the ultimate FU to the politicians who have largely been ignoring and manipulating them for years. Because he's the grenade If he wins he'll basically force the political establishment to change how they operate or risk another grenade being thrown in. People who support him aren't really worried about him being president anyway because he won't be able to get anything too crazy passed into law anyway.

In contrast Clinton is the ultimate establishment choice.

I'd go with Manga. The lack of filler puts it over the top. Plus every anime episode is like 20 minutes where you can read a chapter much faster than that.

I don't think you're likely to find many normal looking main characters in games for the same reason you won't find them in movies(except comedies). Good looking people draw more people in.. It's also why Barbies and Bratz look the way they do despite being targeted at little girls. Besides most game characters are highly athletic to start with so it makes sense for them to be in good shape.

Is it even possible to dislike rice? It seems like saying that you dislike bread.

ghostfishy : I'm not saying there's anything wrong with having different perspectives. I'm saying that it shouldn't be thought of as a primary purpose of games and shouldn't be shoehorned into them. I'm not interested in games being a tool for propaganda. That sort of thinking opens the doors for people like Anita Sarkeesian to come in and say that this or that kind of game is bad. People should make the games they want to make. If they're good then they'll sell.

ghostfishy : Just like there's no evidence that video games make people violent, there's no evidence that video games make people sexist. Video games are a form of entertainment. I don't really want to see people making video games with the intention of changing people's perspectives. I want a fun game not propaganda.

From what I've heard when they say that females are half of gamers they're fudging the truth. Basically they're including things like Facebook games and mobile games. My mother has a few games on her phone that she plays and I've never seen her with the slightest will to pick up a controller.

bobq : The fundamental problem with that is that guns are not only incredibly useful survival tools but they're necessary to be "independent." The notion that if someone is attacking your home or family, and the only option available to you is to wait for the police to arrive and save you is terrifying to many people. Not too long ago I remember hearing about a woman calling the police because her ex boyfriend was trying to break into her house. The police operator woman told her that there were no officers available and the guy ended up breaking in and raping her. Having a gun gives one the power to protect themselves in a proactive manner instead of reactively having to rely on others. Sure, gun laws could be better but I don't think getting rid of them is the answer.

dcpenguin : Our country already has a problem with frivolous lawsuits where everybody is trying to sue somebody for a quick buck. Did you know a company that sells gasoline canisters went out of business because they kept getting sued by idiots who got hurt playing with them and fire? The only people who were affected by this are the little girl and the family of the guy who died. The blame for the incident falls on the guy who died because he's the safety guy there. The dead guy's family has no room to sue because he knew what the job was and took it voluntarily. The girls family might be able to sue the restaurant claiming the girl was traumatized and the instructor they hired is to blame for incompetence but that seems greedy if she's not all that bad.