Remove Ad, Sign Up
Register to Remove Ad
Register to Remove Ad
Remove Ad, Sign Up
Register to Remove Ad
Register to Remove Ad
Signup for Free!
-More Features-
-Far Less Ads-
About   Users   Help
Users & Guests Online
On Page: 3
Directory: 34
Entire Site: 4 & 2077
Page Staff: tgags123,
09-28-25 12:08 PM

2,459 Posts Found by epic-san

Guests get no special search functionality

01-28-14 03:23 PM
| ID: 969720 | 326 Words

epic-san
Level: 96


POSTS: 2399/2459
POST EXP: 76050
LVL EXP: 8921290
CP: 880.4
VIZ: 47989

Sakura Pryde: Your claim has long since been debunked by actual geologists, instead of people who want it to be true.

From Wikipedia, I bolded notable things:

"Near Dinosaur Valley State Park, in the limestone deposits along the Paluxy River, "twin sets" tracks were found in the Glen Rose Formation as early as 1908. These footprints have been cited by young-Earth creationists as evidence against evolutionary theory. However, at least one major proponent of this claim, John D. Morris, of the Institute for Creation Research, now admits the claim
is not well supported by the evidence, that the alleged human tracks may in fact be dinosaurian, and that the tracks near Glen Rose do not support the claim that humans and non-avian dinosaurs coexisted. John Morris and other young-Earth creationists continue to believe that humans and non-avian dinosaurs lived at the same time, a notion that is contrary to the standard view of the geological time scale. This view is the basis for displays at the Creation Evidence Museum in nearby Glen Rose. However, in a rebuttal, biologist Massimo Pigliucci has noted that geologists in the 1980s "clearly demonstrated that no human being left those prints," but rather "they were in fact metatarsal dinosaur tracks, together with a few pure and simple fakes."


"The family of George Adams, the man who originally made the claims, later admitted it was a hoax. "My grandfather was a very good sculptor," said Zana Douglas, from the Adams family who found many of Glen Rose’s real dinosaur tracks. She explained that in the 1930s and the Depression, Glen Rose residents made money by making moonshine and selling dinosaur fossils.[6]The fossils brought $15 to $30 and when the supply ran low, George Adams, Zana's grandfather "just carved more, some with human footprints thrown in."

-en.wikipedia.org "Glen Rose Formation"

And here's a link to the article in the New York Times at the time of its official proclamation as a hoax:
http://www.nytimes.com/1986/06/17/science/fossils-of-man-tracks-shown-to-be-dinosaurian.html
Sakura Pryde: Your claim has long since been debunked by actual geologists, instead of people who want it to be true.

From Wikipedia, I bolded notable things:

"Near Dinosaur Valley State Park, in the limestone deposits along the Paluxy River, "twin sets" tracks were found in the Glen Rose Formation as early as 1908. These footprints have been cited by young-Earth creationists as evidence against evolutionary theory. However, at least one major proponent of this claim, John D. Morris, of the Institute for Creation Research, now admits the claim
is not well supported by the evidence, that the alleged human tracks may in fact be dinosaurian, and that the tracks near Glen Rose do not support the claim that humans and non-avian dinosaurs coexisted. John Morris and other young-Earth creationists continue to believe that humans and non-avian dinosaurs lived at the same time, a notion that is contrary to the standard view of the geological time scale. This view is the basis for displays at the Creation Evidence Museum in nearby Glen Rose. However, in a rebuttal, biologist Massimo Pigliucci has noted that geologists in the 1980s "clearly demonstrated that no human being left those prints," but rather "they were in fact metatarsal dinosaur tracks, together with a few pure and simple fakes."


"The family of George Adams, the man who originally made the claims, later admitted it was a hoax. "My grandfather was a very good sculptor," said Zana Douglas, from the Adams family who found many of Glen Rose’s real dinosaur tracks. She explained that in the 1930s and the Depression, Glen Rose residents made money by making moonshine and selling dinosaur fossils.[6]The fossils brought $15 to $30 and when the supply ran low, George Adams, Zana's grandfather "just carved more, some with human footprints thrown in."

-en.wikipedia.org "Glen Rose Formation"

And here's a link to the article in the New York Times at the time of its official proclamation as a hoax:
http://www.nytimes.com/1986/06/17/science/fossils-of-man-tracks-shown-to-be-dinosaurian.html
Trusted Member
Hit O.P.S. syndrome on 4/2/11 at 5:14 p.m.


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 02-01-11
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow, where Hydreigons fly
Last Post: 2394 days
Last Active: 2388 days

01-27-14 08:17 PM
| ID: 969289 | 19 Words

epic-san
Level: 96


POSTS: 2398/2459
POST EXP: 76050
LVL EXP: 8921290
CP: 880.4
VIZ: 47989

Nintendo Wii - 59
Nintendo Wii U - 46 (+1) 
Nintendo DSiXL - 29 (-3)
Nintendo 3DS - 59 
Nintendo Wii - 59
Nintendo Wii U - 46 (+1) 
Nintendo DSiXL - 29 (-3)
Nintendo 3DS - 59 
Trusted Member
Hit O.P.S. syndrome on 4/2/11 at 5:14 p.m.


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 02-01-11
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow, where Hydreigons fly
Last Post: 2394 days
Last Active: 2388 days

01-27-14 07:39 PM
| ID: 969262 | 302 Words

epic-san
Level: 96


POSTS: 2397/2459
POST EXP: 76050
LVL EXP: 8921290
CP: 880.4
VIZ: 47989

Sword legion : No one knows what came before. Realistically, it could be anything, so it is my error to try and argue my point. What my point is is that these scientific theories are appropriate to be taught in science because they were formed from a hypothesis and evidence was found and the research is done and over. That's evidence based reasoning and it is science. What i'm saying is that spiritual belief is not evidence based reasoning. It's by no means a wrong way to think, but it's not science-y. That was the original point of this thread. Spiritual belief is a beautiful thing. Strong communities are formed. It has a rich history and culture. Science isn't all great though. Like anything, science can be used for good or bad. E=MC^2 was a great equation. The A-bomb was formed from it. Most of the principles of religious beliefs are to do good. But, people have perverted and abused old texts to justify horrors. Each side has its ups and downs and each has a place on earth. But they're not related. 

I have my reasons for thinking what I think, and they're not unfounded. But, you bring up a good point. Although that's not going to make me believe you, I can see now why you think that. Sometimes all it takes is understanding, and what you said helped me a great deal to understand you.

Also, a parting shot - about accepting things from the experts... you do that too. If you believe that the Bible is true, then you just accept it. Many people just take information from authority figures and that's a problem with our society. I didn't just accept things, I looked it over myself and came to my own conclusion. You came to yours. The end.
Sword legion : No one knows what came before. Realistically, it could be anything, so it is my error to try and argue my point. What my point is is that these scientific theories are appropriate to be taught in science because they were formed from a hypothesis and evidence was found and the research is done and over. That's evidence based reasoning and it is science. What i'm saying is that spiritual belief is not evidence based reasoning. It's by no means a wrong way to think, but it's not science-y. That was the original point of this thread. Spiritual belief is a beautiful thing. Strong communities are formed. It has a rich history and culture. Science isn't all great though. Like anything, science can be used for good or bad. E=MC^2 was a great equation. The A-bomb was formed from it. Most of the principles of religious beliefs are to do good. But, people have perverted and abused old texts to justify horrors. Each side has its ups and downs and each has a place on earth. But they're not related. 

I have my reasons for thinking what I think, and they're not unfounded. But, you bring up a good point. Although that's not going to make me believe you, I can see now why you think that. Sometimes all it takes is understanding, and what you said helped me a great deal to understand you.

Also, a parting shot - about accepting things from the experts... you do that too. If you believe that the Bible is true, then you just accept it. Many people just take information from authority figures and that's a problem with our society. I didn't just accept things, I looked it over myself and came to my own conclusion. You came to yours. The end.
Trusted Member
Hit O.P.S. syndrome on 4/2/11 at 5:14 p.m.


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 02-01-11
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow, where Hydreigons fly
Last Post: 2394 days
Last Active: 2388 days

01-27-14 07:22 PM
| ID: 969242 | 10 Words

epic-san
Level: 96


POSTS: 2396/2459
POST EXP: 76050
LVL EXP: 8921290
CP: 880.4
VIZ: 47989

Razor-987 : Go ahead and add me. I added you already.
Razor-987 : Go ahead and add me. I added you already.
Trusted Member
Hit O.P.S. syndrome on 4/2/11 at 5:14 p.m.


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 02-01-11
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow, where Hydreigons fly
Last Post: 2394 days
Last Active: 2388 days

01-27-14 03:11 PM
| ID: 969076 | 11 Words

epic-san
Level: 96


POSTS: 2395/2459
POST EXP: 76050
LVL EXP: 8921290
CP: 880.4
VIZ: 47989

The Pokemon in my Friend Safari are Butterfree, Beautifly, and Heracross. 
The Pokemon in my Friend Safari are Butterfree, Beautifly, and Heracross. 
Trusted Member
Hit O.P.S. syndrome on 4/2/11 at 5:14 p.m.


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 02-01-11
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow, where Hydreigons fly
Last Post: 2394 days
Last Active: 2388 days

01-27-14 03:09 PM
| ID: 969071 | 577 Words

epic-san
Level: 96


POSTS: 2394/2459
POST EXP: 76050
LVL EXP: 8921290
CP: 880.4
VIZ: 47989

Sword legion:

So we both agree that more knowledgeable people should be arguing this. I really feel that we're not going to get anywhere by just parroting what the experts of both sides say. 

Also, about saying we have no idea about what came before the big bang... we don't. We have no idea, you have no idea. Some people say there's a god. some people wish to find out for themselves. But, logically, if a void in our understanding of the universe can be filled with the idea of a god, then it can be filled with any other number of claims. Without having solid evidence (which I would love to see you present, by the way), why should I believe that there is a god? When making a claim, the burden of presenting proof lies on the claimer. The burden of proof lies with someone who is making a claim, and is not upon anyone else to disprove. The inability, or disinclination, to disprove a claim does not render that claim valid, nor give it any credence whatsoever. 
The fossil record has been painstakingly combed through time and time again and proven true. Science has advanced greatly since 1913.

Oh, and the wikipedia article on the hominid man also stated your argument. I bolded some interesting things.

"Although the identity of
You need a lot more faith to believe something for which there is no good evidence than to say that you don't know. So before I go jumping to conclusions and making an ass of myself, do you personally think the big bang is true? Keep in mind that the concept as a whole is not scientifically in dispute, I just want to know what you think. Also, if you look at any debate between experts, no creation scientist has ever proven evolution false.

You presented two hoaxes based on idiots grafting bones together.  In the same articles, it is stated that they were scientifically investigated and quickly proven false. The fossil record isn't a bunch of hoaxes, as bones are easily identified by professionals and they can tell when something is not right. It was quickly shown as false back then, and any new hoaxes are proven false even quicker.

"As early as 1913, David Waterston of King's College London published in Nature his conclusion that the sample consisted of an ape mandible and human skull. Likewise, French paleontologist Marcellin Boule concluded the same thing in 1915. A third opinion from American zoologist Gerrit Smith Miller concluded Piltdown's jaw came from a fossil ape. In 1923, Franz Weidenreich examined the remains and correctly reported that they consisted of a modern human cranium and an orangutan jaw with filed-down teeth."
H. haroldcookii did not achieve general acceptance in the scientific community, and the purported species was retracted half a decade after the original article had been published by Osborn, creationists have promoted the episode as an example of the scientific errors that can undermine the credibility of paleontology and hominid evolution theories, and how such information is peer reviewed or accepted as mainstream knowledge. These arguments often exaggerate the wide acceptance of Nebraska man as a hominid fossil."

Any errors today would be caught, and the fossil record has been checked time and time again.

All I'm doing is providing logical, evidence based arguments, and you provide hoaxes. A hoax is not a piece of evidence for evolution, it is a hoax and was proven false.




 
Sword legion:

So we both agree that more knowledgeable people should be arguing this. I really feel that we're not going to get anywhere by just parroting what the experts of both sides say. 

Also, about saying we have no idea about what came before the big bang... we don't. We have no idea, you have no idea. Some people say there's a god. some people wish to find out for themselves. But, logically, if a void in our understanding of the universe can be filled with the idea of a god, then it can be filled with any other number of claims. Without having solid evidence (which I would love to see you present, by the way), why should I believe that there is a god? When making a claim, the burden of presenting proof lies on the claimer. The burden of proof lies with someone who is making a claim, and is not upon anyone else to disprove. The inability, or disinclination, to disprove a claim does not render that claim valid, nor give it any credence whatsoever. 
The fossil record has been painstakingly combed through time and time again and proven true. Science has advanced greatly since 1913.

Oh, and the wikipedia article on the hominid man also stated your argument. I bolded some interesting things.

"Although the identity of
You need a lot more faith to believe something for which there is no good evidence than to say that you don't know. So before I go jumping to conclusions and making an ass of myself, do you personally think the big bang is true? Keep in mind that the concept as a whole is not scientifically in dispute, I just want to know what you think. Also, if you look at any debate between experts, no creation scientist has ever proven evolution false.

You presented two hoaxes based on idiots grafting bones together.  In the same articles, it is stated that they were scientifically investigated and quickly proven false. The fossil record isn't a bunch of hoaxes, as bones are easily identified by professionals and they can tell when something is not right. It was quickly shown as false back then, and any new hoaxes are proven false even quicker.

"As early as 1913, David Waterston of King's College London published in Nature his conclusion that the sample consisted of an ape mandible and human skull. Likewise, French paleontologist Marcellin Boule concluded the same thing in 1915. A third opinion from American zoologist Gerrit Smith Miller concluded Piltdown's jaw came from a fossil ape. In 1923, Franz Weidenreich examined the remains and correctly reported that they consisted of a modern human cranium and an orangutan jaw with filed-down teeth."
H. haroldcookii did not achieve general acceptance in the scientific community, and the purported species was retracted half a decade after the original article had been published by Osborn, creationists have promoted the episode as an example of the scientific errors that can undermine the credibility of paleontology and hominid evolution theories, and how such information is peer reviewed or accepted as mainstream knowledge. These arguments often exaggerate the wide acceptance of Nebraska man as a hominid fossil."

Any errors today would be caught, and the fossil record has been checked time and time again.

All I'm doing is providing logical, evidence based arguments, and you provide hoaxes. A hoax is not a piece of evidence for evolution, it is a hoax and was proven false.




 
Trusted Member
Hit O.P.S. syndrome on 4/2/11 at 5:14 p.m.


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 02-01-11
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow, where Hydreigons fly
Last Post: 2394 days
Last Active: 2388 days

01-26-14 11:41 PM
| ID: 968855 | 566 Words

epic-san
Level: 96


POSTS: 2393/2459
POST EXP: 76050
LVL EXP: 8921290
CP: 880.4
VIZ: 47989

Sword legion : All I'm saying is tat I'm arguing on behalf of science, and I am not myself an expert in the field.


Let's say we're learning about India in social studies. We learn about the caste system, but we want to learn about the culture of India. You can't do that without learning a bit about hinduism, from an objective?standpoint. "They believe this, this, and this". It's a part of the culture and would be a missed learning opportunity about the culture of India if hinduism was ignored. That's just from an objective, cultural standpoint, hence why it's social studies. For instance, schools do units on greek mythology. Kids are taught about the greek gods and what the ancient greeks believed, but they aren't told that it's definitely true. Also, the school might skip over Norse mythology, but it doesn't cause riots, because it doesn't have a place in the curriculum. In a social studies curriculum, if a bit of learning about mythologies about any religion would help the class understand better what was or is going on in those countries, then teach it. Just don't tell them that it is the truth. THAT is the government respecting an establishment of religion, telling kids that their unfounded claims are true. Teaching from a nonbiased standpoint is mythology education. There's a difference between education and indoctrination.

rcarter2 stated perfectly why I didn't want to present a "strongest evidence". I'm also arguing on behalf of separation of church and state, as well as science. I'll tell you right now that I'm not a scientist. But, I can think logically and produce a brilliant argument of the basic ideas. I didn't say that there was no evidence. I said that there is a lot of evidence. Go ask an evolutionary scientist, go talk to an archaeologist. I'm not a scientist, but I can direct you to people who have evidence. If I tried to present all the evidence for evolution, I would drown in all of it. But by all means, present your evidence for creationism, and I will smash it into pieces.

Also, it sees that you've been going to rcarter2 a lot in order to debate. I have no one that I go to, and I'm presenting a pretty good argument on my own. If you need to rely on outside support to help you argue your point, then it seems that you might not be fit for arguing it.

Also, about the universe forming from nothing.


We don't know where it came from, but we know how it came to be. Instead of making a claim with no evidence to back it up, we can stand up and honestly, proudly say that we have no idea. A god that fills in the gaps of knowledge becomes a smaller god as the years pass by.


Also, it's really pathetic that you're resorting to the kindergarten method of effectively calling me a chicken. I can stand up and say that I'm not an expert on the subject, but I have the basic concepts down and can argue them. I'm telling you that there are many more qualified people who can completely smash your claims, and that you should try and debate who really knows evolution and science inside out. You'll end up learning a lot, because it seems that you really don't know a lot.?
Sword legion : All I'm saying is tat I'm arguing on behalf of science, and I am not myself an expert in the field.


Let's say we're learning about India in social studies. We learn about the caste system, but we want to learn about the culture of India. You can't do that without learning a bit about hinduism, from an objective?standpoint. "They believe this, this, and this". It's a part of the culture and would be a missed learning opportunity about the culture of India if hinduism was ignored. That's just from an objective, cultural standpoint, hence why it's social studies. For instance, schools do units on greek mythology. Kids are taught about the greek gods and what the ancient greeks believed, but they aren't told that it's definitely true. Also, the school might skip over Norse mythology, but it doesn't cause riots, because it doesn't have a place in the curriculum. In a social studies curriculum, if a bit of learning about mythologies about any religion would help the class understand better what was or is going on in those countries, then teach it. Just don't tell them that it is the truth. THAT is the government respecting an establishment of religion, telling kids that their unfounded claims are true. Teaching from a nonbiased standpoint is mythology education. There's a difference between education and indoctrination.

rcarter2 stated perfectly why I didn't want to present a "strongest evidence". I'm also arguing on behalf of separation of church and state, as well as science. I'll tell you right now that I'm not a scientist. But, I can think logically and produce a brilliant argument of the basic ideas. I didn't say that there was no evidence. I said that there is a lot of evidence. Go ask an evolutionary scientist, go talk to an archaeologist. I'm not a scientist, but I can direct you to people who have evidence. If I tried to present all the evidence for evolution, I would drown in all of it. But by all means, present your evidence for creationism, and I will smash it into pieces.

Also, it sees that you've been going to rcarter2 a lot in order to debate. I have no one that I go to, and I'm presenting a pretty good argument on my own. If you need to rely on outside support to help you argue your point, then it seems that you might not be fit for arguing it.

Also, about the universe forming from nothing.


We don't know where it came from, but we know how it came to be. Instead of making a claim with no evidence to back it up, we can stand up and honestly, proudly say that we have no idea. A god that fills in the gaps of knowledge becomes a smaller god as the years pass by.


Also, it's really pathetic that you're resorting to the kindergarten method of effectively calling me a chicken. I can stand up and say that I'm not an expert on the subject, but I have the basic concepts down and can argue them. I'm telling you that there are many more qualified people who can completely smash your claims, and that you should try and debate who really knows evolution and science inside out. You'll end up learning a lot, because it seems that you really don't know a lot.?
Trusted Member
Hit O.P.S. syndrome on 4/2/11 at 5:14 p.m.


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 02-01-11
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow, where Hydreigons fly
Last Post: 2394 days
Last Active: 2388 days

01-25-14 04:32 PM
| ID: 967877 | 6 Words

epic-san
Level: 96


POSTS: 2392/2459
POST EXP: 76050
LVL EXP: 8921290
CP: 880.4
VIZ: 47989

epicsomeguysan279. A mouthful, but certainly memorable.
epicsomeguysan279. A mouthful, but certainly memorable.
Trusted Member
Hit O.P.S. syndrome on 4/2/11 at 5:14 p.m.


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 02-01-11
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow, where Hydreigons fly
Last Post: 2394 days
Last Active: 2388 days

01-25-14 04:28 PM
| ID: 967875 | 41 Words

epic-san
Level: 96


POSTS: 2391/2459
POST EXP: 76050
LVL EXP: 8921290
CP: 880.4
VIZ: 47989

Hoenn was my first region, so I'm a bit biased. Even with all the surfing, it really was a unique and creative region that was tons of fun to play. It also had arguably the best soundtrack of any Pokémon game.
Hoenn was my first region, so I'm a bit biased. Even with all the surfing, it really was a unique and creative region that was tons of fun to play. It also had arguably the best soundtrack of any Pokémon game.
Trusted Member
Hit O.P.S. syndrome on 4/2/11 at 5:14 p.m.


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 02-01-11
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow, where Hydreigons fly
Last Post: 2394 days
Last Active: 2388 days

01-25-14 04:26 PM
| ID: 967873 | 27 Words

epic-san
Level: 96


POSTS: 2390/2459
POST EXP: 76050
LVL EXP: 8921290
CP: 880.4
VIZ: 47989

When replying to a thread, I only care about the topic, and not the maker's current status. If it's a good thread, I will reply to it.
When replying to a thread, I only care about the topic, and not the maker's current status. If it's a good thread, I will reply to it.
Trusted Member
Hit O.P.S. syndrome on 4/2/11 at 5:14 p.m.


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 02-01-11
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow, where Hydreigons fly
Last Post: 2394 days
Last Active: 2388 days

01-25-14 04:24 PM
| ID: 967871 | 119 Words

epic-san
Level: 96


POSTS: 2389/2459
POST EXP: 76050
LVL EXP: 8921290
CP: 880.4
VIZ: 47989

Motley Crue - 6
Velvet Revolver - 4
Guns N Roses - 12
Slayer - 9
Iron Maiden - 9
Judas Priest - 12
Avenged Sevenfold - 9
Deep Purple - 13 (+1)
Audioslave - 12
R.E.M. - 10
The White Stripes - 16
The Killers - 7
Tenacious D - 28 
Bastille - 4
30 Seconds to Mars - 10
The Jimi Hendrix Experience - 12
Santana - 12
Twisted Sister - 12
3 Doors Down - 12
Theory of a Dead Man - 12
The Offspring - 12
Green Day - 6 (-3)
Beck - 8  
Nirvana - 15
Coldplay - 12
Slipknot - 12
Queens of the Stone Age - 13
All American Rejects - 12
Motley Crue - 6
Velvet Revolver - 4
Guns N Roses - 12
Slayer - 9
Iron Maiden - 9
Judas Priest - 12
Avenged Sevenfold - 9
Deep Purple - 13 (+1)
Audioslave - 12
R.E.M. - 10
The White Stripes - 16
The Killers - 7
Tenacious D - 28 
Bastille - 4
30 Seconds to Mars - 10
The Jimi Hendrix Experience - 12
Santana - 12
Twisted Sister - 12
3 Doors Down - 12
Theory of a Dead Man - 12
The Offspring - 12
Green Day - 6 (-3)
Beck - 8  
Nirvana - 15
Coldplay - 12
Slipknot - 12
Queens of the Stone Age - 13
All American Rejects - 12
Trusted Member
Hit O.P.S. syndrome on 4/2/11 at 5:14 p.m.


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 02-01-11
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow, where Hydreigons fly
Last Post: 2394 days
Last Active: 2388 days

01-25-14 04:23 PM
| ID: 967870 | 23 Words

epic-san
Level: 96


POSTS: 2388/2459
POST EXP: 76050
LVL EXP: 8921290
CP: 880.4
VIZ: 47989

They're usually very distracting, with either the ad flashing or shaking to get your attention. I use adblock, however, so they don't matter.
They're usually very distracting, with either the ad flashing or shaking to get your attention. I use adblock, however, so they don't matter.
Trusted Member
Hit O.P.S. syndrome on 4/2/11 at 5:14 p.m.


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 02-01-11
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow, where Hydreigons fly
Last Post: 2394 days
Last Active: 2388 days

01-25-14 04:22 PM
| ID: 967869 | 96 Words

epic-san
Level: 96


POSTS: 2387/2459
POST EXP: 76050
LVL EXP: 8921290
CP: 880.4
VIZ: 47989

Likes: 1  Dislikes: 0
Acura - 12
Audi - 13
BMW - 12
Buick - 12
Cadillac - 10
Chevrolet - 9 (-3)
Chrysler - 12
Dodge - 12
Fiat - 4 
Ford - 13
General Motors - 10
GMC - 12
Honda - 9
Hyundai - 12
Jaguar - 12
Jeep - 9 
Kia - 6
Lexus - 12
Lincoln - 13
Mazda - 12
Mitsubishi - 7 
Nissan - 12
Porsche - 13
Plymouth - 14
Renault - 12
Scion - 12
Subaru - 12
Suzuki - 6 
Toyota - 13 (+1)
Volkswagen - 12
Volvo - 10
Acura - 12
Audi - 13
BMW - 12
Buick - 12
Cadillac - 10
Chevrolet - 9 (-3)
Chrysler - 12
Dodge - 12
Fiat - 4 
Ford - 13
General Motors - 10
GMC - 12
Honda - 9
Hyundai - 12
Jaguar - 12
Jeep - 9 
Kia - 6
Lexus - 12
Lincoln - 13
Mazda - 12
Mitsubishi - 7 
Nissan - 12
Porsche - 13
Plymouth - 14
Renault - 12
Scion - 12
Subaru - 12
Suzuki - 6 
Toyota - 13 (+1)
Volkswagen - 12
Volvo - 10
Trusted Member
Hit O.P.S. syndrome on 4/2/11 at 5:14 p.m.


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 02-01-11
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow, where Hydreigons fly
Last Post: 2394 days
Last Active: 2388 days

01-25-14 04:20 PM
| ID: 967868 | 15 Words

epic-san
Level: 96


POSTS: 2386/2459
POST EXP: 76050
LVL EXP: 8921290
CP: 880.4
VIZ: 47989

1 month isn't a very long time.

The person below me has no pants on.
1 month isn't a very long time.

The person below me has no pants on.
Trusted Member
Hit O.P.S. syndrome on 4/2/11 at 5:14 p.m.


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 02-01-11
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow, where Hydreigons fly
Last Post: 2394 days
Last Active: 2388 days

01-25-14 04:20 PM
| ID: 967866 | 29 Words

epic-san
Level: 96


POSTS: 2385/2459
POST EXP: 76050
LVL EXP: 8921290
CP: 880.4
VIZ: 47989

I have 10 friends I usually hang out with. Some of them I hang out with less often, and some are always in the room we claim for lunch.
I have 10 friends I usually hang out with. Some of them I hang out with less often, and some are always in the room we claim for lunch.
Trusted Member
Hit O.P.S. syndrome on 4/2/11 at 5:14 p.m.


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 02-01-11
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow, where Hydreigons fly
Last Post: 2394 days
Last Active: 2388 days

01-25-14 04:18 PM
| ID: 967865 | 18 Words

epic-san
Level: 96


POSTS: 2384/2459
POST EXP: 76050
LVL EXP: 8921290
CP: 880.4
VIZ: 47989

Mission Impossible - 11 (+1)
The Hangover - 11 
Rush Hour - 10
National Treasure - 11 (-3)
Mission Impossible - 11 (+1)
The Hangover - 11 
Rush Hour - 10
National Treasure - 11 (-3)
Trusted Member
Hit O.P.S. syndrome on 4/2/11 at 5:14 p.m.


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 02-01-11
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow, where Hydreigons fly
Last Post: 2394 days
Last Active: 2388 days

01-25-14 04:17 PM
| ID: 967864 | 57 Words

epic-san
Level: 96


POSTS: 2383/2459
POST EXP: 76050
LVL EXP: 8921290
CP: 880.4
VIZ: 47989

I bring:
-A binder for each class
-A folder for important miscellaneous things
-A lot of pencils
-A joke book (you never know when the opportune time for a joke might pop up)
-Extra paper
-My 3ds
-My phone
-Earbuds
-Wallet (for loans, people often need money to buy lunch, and the interest is a good profit)
I bring:
-A binder for each class
-A folder for important miscellaneous things
-A lot of pencils
-A joke book (you never know when the opportune time for a joke might pop up)
-Extra paper
-My 3ds
-My phone
-Earbuds
-Wallet (for loans, people often need money to buy lunch, and the interest is a good profit)
Trusted Member
Hit O.P.S. syndrome on 4/2/11 at 5:14 p.m.


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 02-01-11
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow, where Hydreigons fly
Last Post: 2394 days
Last Active: 2388 days

01-25-14 04:14 PM
| ID: 967862 | 30 Words

epic-san
Level: 96


POSTS: 2382/2459
POST EXP: 76050
LVL EXP: 8921290
CP: 880.4
VIZ: 47989

Kirby's Dream Land: 13 
Kirby's Adventure: 19 
Kirby's Dream Land 2: 6
Kirby Super Star: 10 (+1)
Kirby's Dream Land 3: 9 (-3)
Kirby's Avalanche: 9
Kirby Air Ride: 9
Kirby's Dream Land: 13 
Kirby's Adventure: 19 
Kirby's Dream Land 2: 6
Kirby Super Star: 10 (+1)
Kirby's Dream Land 3: 9 (-3)
Kirby's Avalanche: 9
Kirby Air Ride: 9
Trusted Member
Hit O.P.S. syndrome on 4/2/11 at 5:14 p.m.


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 02-01-11
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow, where Hydreigons fly
Last Post: 2394 days
Last Active: 2388 days

01-25-14 04:12 PM
| ID: 967861 | 19 Words

epic-san
Level: 96


POSTS: 2381/2459
POST EXP: 76050
LVL EXP: 8921290
CP: 880.4
VIZ: 47989

Nintendo Wii - 61
Nintendo Wii U - 45 (+1)
Nintendo DSiXL - 37 (-3)
Nintendo 3DS - 66 
Nintendo Wii - 61
Nintendo Wii U - 45 (+1)
Nintendo DSiXL - 37 (-3)
Nintendo 3DS - 66 
Trusted Member
Hit O.P.S. syndrome on 4/2/11 at 5:14 p.m.


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 02-01-11
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow, where Hydreigons fly
Last Post: 2394 days
Last Active: 2388 days

01-25-14 04:11 PM
| ID: 967860 | 18 Words

epic-san
Level: 96


POSTS: 2380/2459
POST EXP: 76050
LVL EXP: 8921290
CP: 880.4
VIZ: 47989

PacmanandMariofan :
Reaction to the 2010 Copiapó mining accident.
What is the answer to life, the universe, and everything?
PacmanandMariofan :
Reaction to the 2010 Copiapó mining accident.
What is the answer to life, the universe, and everything?
Trusted Member
Hit O.P.S. syndrome on 4/2/11 at 5:14 p.m.


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 02-01-11
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow, where Hydreigons fly
Last Post: 2394 days
Last Active: 2388 days

Links

Page Comments


This page has no comments

Adblocker detected!

Vizzed.com is very expensive to keep alive! The Ads pay for the servers.

Vizzed has 3 TB worth of games and 1 TB worth of music.  This site is free to use but the ads barely pay for the monthly server fees.  If too many more people use ad block, the site cannot survive.

We prioritize the community over the site profits.  This is why we avoid using annoying (but high paying) ads like most other sites which include popups, obnoxious sounds and animations, malware, and other forms of intrusiveness.  We'll do our part to never resort to these types of ads, please do your part by helping support this site by adding Vizzed.com to your ad blocking whitelist.

×