Guess what outcome I'd bet my entire daytrading account on.

When the person with the Doge memes starts standing up against "spam".

Nope. You failed English.

ZeroTails :

You are not getting a free copy of my book when it comes out.

What could paw-sibly go wrong?

Rival groups are always trying to do that too each other. It's like how they claim that:

1. Homosexuality is mentally healthy.
2. Abortion does not take the life of a real human being. It just dismantles a cluster of developing cells.
3. This complex world is the result of a series of events with no intelligent design or divine influence.
4. Disliking my post is going to do something other than give me the pleasure of knowing I made someone mad cause they're a snowflake, and probably a cissgender, white male at that.

Then there are tons of little sub ideologies that may be common with atheists, or not. The first two are subject to personal opinion. There was a time when racism was quite common in evolutionist thinking. You can read about some proponents of evolution talking about how they didn't emphasize with black people starving during the great depression ect.

EX Palen is right though. There are tons of people with different beleifs who don't believe that. I mean, Christians, can really hate other Christians for misrepresenting Yahovah. Some atheists really hate others for destroying the ideology behind a traditional family, the role of women, men, children ect when they feel it is vital to our survival that we understand our evolutionary roots and make the best of it. One of my best friends is an agnostic in France. He's really cool and I love talking to him. He's smart, not controlled by the system, and we agree on a lot except for evolution and a few political values. (As expected, I'm far more "right" leaning as an individual american. He's an honorable and mature individual. The type of friend I'd have over a lot of "Christians" I could keep company with.

Jesus said that the world would hate you for His name's sake. So don't be surprised when a system of different ideology tries to impose that it's better than your people. Be open minded, because I think that atheists do pick on Christians for some good reasons at times. Always seek to better yourself. Enjoy it when you find people who may not agree with you, but of who's judgement you can take more friendly, and of whom seem to be looking for the truth. Not that you or I always have it.

Eniitan :

I love Amazing world of Gumball- if you watch the right episodes. Mostly because it reminded me of the awkwardness that is life when turning 13, since you're still a kid, but your mind is maturing a lot. And dealing with hormones. (Sorry. XD)

Oh, and the fact that families actually ARE like that in real life. It's kindof cringey and sweet. XD

Teen Titans Go was funny for a while, however, it's really horrible that it uses the Teen Titans cast. As someone who hates Sonic Boom (outside of like. . . 2-3 episodes?) . . . I can emphasize with all the hate that the original Teen Titans fans give to Teen Titans Go. Also, the same scheme is getting old. The only reason it's as popular as it is, is because it's advertised all the time.


Anyways, for my questions.

1. What's your favorite meme?
2. Will Shadow ever be happy?
3. What do you think of Sonic himself?
4. Will Amy ever grow up?
5. Have you ever seen Cowboy Bebop?
6. What did you think of the Madoka Magica Rebellion Movie?

Yeah.

I've had to tear shingles off, come back the next day in heavy rain and put new shingles back on. I've roofed in rain and wind so bad that when the rain fell off the roof, the wind just blew it back on- literally.

I've worked in temperatures hot enough to melt the tar based shingles if you step on them too hard. It's been so hot that I've gotten dizzy and had to get off the roof. It's at about that same temperature that you have to quite shingling because there's no way you aren't ruining just by stepping on them.

I've worked 9, no, 11 IIRC days in a row just to make ends meet because we have to beat the rain before we get to far into autumn. Otherwise it will rain for to many days in a row and we'll never have enough time tear shingles off and get a new roof.

I've set forms, run the rod on concrete, and spent hours doing touch up after the fact so that the surface doesn't look ugly with nothing but a trough.

I've done it all with an overbearing boss who expects too much of us and had way to much stuff done for him at an early age. A guy with a short temper and who's terrible at communicating. Every employee will tell you about that with him. Some find his temper tolerable mostly because it doesn't last. But he outbursts easily.

I hate my job.

I make 35$ an hour in the summer doing government jobs and get almost five months off just from rain. That's when I work on my book series and other things.

That's why I still do my job.

Whatever the hell life want's from me, I can dish it. I call in sick maybe 2 days out of the year. After a week of roofing, I hardly move on Saturdays because my muscles are so sore from walking on an incline and carrying the fiberglass filled stuff back and forth over the course of 20 feet again and again and again.

I'm proud of my job. I don't want to do it forever, but I'm proud that I can do it.

That's all I have to say.

Two Users.

1. Eniitan
2. A user of this

That's as far as active members go anyways. If I were honest there are four people registered on this site I'd love to meet, and two of them I probably will someday, it's just a matter of time.

Oh, I finally found this thread! Time for some questions!

1. Have you every drawn anything you would consider decent or good?
2. What's your favorite work which you have written?
3. Do you enjoy making jewelry?
4. Are there any games you are looking forward to coming out lately?

Glad you're still drawing. You have this happy- cartoony style that could bring a stone's face to smile. Well done as always kimmy, we'll be cheering for ya.

Here, have a special Legion- like.

Ghostbear1111 :

"Saying that, I think, "Is it necessary?" is a simple question with a simple answer: Yes. It's meeting a need that people are obviously willing to pay money to enjoy."

You mean like drugs, right?

I get the feeling we are known for being "a very behind the curve" country.

A user of this :

If you ask me all Obama did was Blame Bush every time reporters asked him about the shape of the economy for the first six years, and when Osama was finally "killed" he took credit for it that wasn't totally owed to him. Bush is definitely part of the reason that this even became a reality.

And in case people are asking, no, I'm not a real fan of George Bush, but that's because I don't know much about him period. He was president during the fairly early years of my life.

I hate Obama for one reason. Obamacare. The creation of it completely misunderstands how drug companies actually work to keep several Americans under their thumb and merely transfer's the hand to another party. They didn't fix our problem with drugs and patents, and it seems to me that it's only young people who are saving money with Obamacare while older folks with already existing conditions have to pay huge fees after their first operation. The amount of money some of the older people I've known have had to pay ridiculous amounts.

Technically, a social healthcare act could have been better then the messed up pyramid we had beforehand where a pill that takes 15$ to manufacture is sold for 800$, but that's not the case. I'm going to suggest to you that it's because politicians are not interested in protecting us from careless companies, but rather they purchase us with lies and merely shift who's taking the abuse and what companies are in control.

The bad thing is if you don't have Obamacare you had to get a religious exemption or sign up for Obamacare itself. I didn't want to sign up for Obamacare because I feared what the expenses would become later in my life as it became for some other people I knew. My other option was a 40$ a month membership to the Christian Brotherhood, which I also really did not want to pay, but it was still better than a 400$ fine that doubles every year. I was being forced into this, and maybe, just maybe. . .

I don't want healthcare? Like, I don't care if it's better for me. As a free citizen, I have the right to choose what's best for myself and I don't want to pay into a system for others, and hope it pays me back more in the long run. I always thought the arguments for people who justify porn, or sleeping around and other sexual acts was it was their life and their risk. But for some reason that's not the case for healthcare? *shrug*

At any rate, I believe it's our responsibility in a free market first and foremost to take said responsibility for ourselves, eat healthy and refuse business to those who offer bad deal. However, thanks to the monopolization of some drugs, and the general unity of such companies, we can't do that.

On the other side of things, I'm a big fan of eating naturally and looking natural cures (which are actually illegal at times in the U.S.) to cure disease. So hopefully I wouldn't need to be part of a system. I don't want to have to pay into a system for other people's health however. That's one thing that worries me about socialism in the long run. That eventually everyone is going to be forced to be charitable and soon we won't even get to choose where to put our charity. The power to take so many people's money and decide what it's best spent on also scares me regarding the government. Ours certainly has proven it can't count it's own cash straight. What are they doing handling more of ours? I think we have a number of other issues that are important for us to fix first. We need to count the programs that are actually necessary and slowly reintegrate what's most important as we get our deficit under control. Britain was the leading economical superpower in the world before World War II. But then the U.S. had to bail them out and we've generally been on top since. Not today though.

Edit: It's nice to see that this post will actually show up unlike somewhere else I would be posting.

I only get revenge when it's convenient. In fact, I find the best way to get revenge is to keep living your life normally till one day suddenly you realize the other person finally got what they deserve, while you sitting in their place. I've gotten revenge against most people who moved against me merely by doing what I do best and not searching for it, and it's always very satisfying to see Karma do it's work for me. Focusing on revenge your entire life is too negative though, and I wouldn't recommend it. Self defense in the moment of something is one thing, or even standing up for yourself and walking away. But a wider, more long term and loathsome concept of revenge is not exactly healthy. At least not if you are focusing on it all day.

Zlinqx :

Homosexuality is still inherently more dangerous because of their use of buttsex to simulate the vagina, more likelihood of anal fissures, I would go as far as to say that lust is a generally large issue with them as well. It seems the very ideology that most of them have makes them more ignorant about STDs and more likely to transmit them. That's what the last 40 years of statistics have suggested anyways. I want an explanation for this other than "We're still getting the word out" Because honestly. The people who campaigned for gay rights were not only some of the loudest people on social media. . . supposedly all into the scientific facts, should be the same community in places like San Francisco showing a heavy majority of the STDs come from them. If a person already suspects that such people were just doing it for easy sex or because they can't control themselves, or even that it's a by product of abuse? It only goes further to confirm their suspicions.

"You cannot change a person's sexuality, you can only suppress it. That's more likely to drive people to inflict self harm and just overall be far more damaging to their health and development than letting them be who they are."

Perhaps you would change your mind if you were too look at pedophilia, bestiality or mechanophilia? I believe that some mental issues can be grounded quite deep, and other things are almost unturnable if they happen during a person's development, but a person can still be happy functioning properly. Isn't that were we wish to bring all people who suffer from any such issue? Some people are the way that they are because they themselves choose to try something that they never should have. As you know your first sexual experience can be very directive and impacting in a persons life.

The reason I focus on homosexuality is because it's a hot issue that everyone was talking about in my lifetime. Looking backwards? Yeah, we have TONS of problems that, in my opinion actually laid down the foundations for homosexual acceptance. People eat too much. We are a consumptive and impulsive nation. 50% of Americans are divorced, and we abort 300,000 babies in the U.S. and Canada every year. Not to mention much of our media is incredibly sexualized. I'm aware there are other problems, and there are worse ones. In fact, it would be unfair to just target homosexuality, so I wouldn't.


Our medical companies are protected by patents on drugs that they can place a 600$ markup on. No one can compete with it, and people just. . . buy it because they aren't educated on natural remedies in life. Doctors aren't even taught about human consumption and how it affects their health. Instead their classes are funded by pharmaceutical companies who are mostly concerned with teaching them what drug to prescribe.

Our food companies basically get away with selling stuff that simply isn't food. Processed material linked to causing cancer, and loading up sugar in just about everything. The sugar I don't think I would legally do anything about, as it is a civilian's responsibility to decide how much sugar they can eat on that day. However, some forms of preservation I'm really not a big fan of. I will fully admit, I am parroting my mom here, who did spend months researching this topic so that she could cure her cancer naturally. She should have died two years ago, but she refused to go with the crowd. She did her research. She avoided chemo therapy, which does terrible things to the human body, she changed her diet, and even tried laterile, which for some reason has a 20% success rate in curing cancer, but is illegal in the U.S. (Because drug companies don't like it when chemo therapy makes them millions already.)


I think something does need to be done about that, but the problem is rooted in how much power the companies have in the shaping of our laws in the first place. They make it very hard for anyone to compete against them who is new, and they like the control that they have. It's definitely an issue.

I do agree that we should look at people for who they are as people and judge them accordingly- but, being ignorant of their biological gender will not help anyone trying to find out what they should do. In fact, even in a more "liberated" society, I notice male still doing the hardest work around town, which takes place outside, ect, where as women are accountants, cashiers and otherwise working indoors. I don't mean to sound rude, and I do not approve of things simply because society accepts it. (This includes falling into traditional gender roles). But. . . I think that if you are a man, and you don't take into account that you are a man, then you are not considering something important about yourself, that will let you make a more educated decision for the rest of your life. I don't think that career choices are too important when it comes to gender in a. . . broad sense. But I do believe your gender will impact your strengths in certain aspects of that career. Yes, all people are different, but all men and women are also similar at the core. Their sexual body parts all fuction the same most certainly, and only a woman is capable of carrying a child inside her womb for 9 months before giving birth- a very special ability, and something employers do have the right to consider when hiring women too I might add.

Yes, I do consider them selfish. As selfish as. . . people who evade taxes or the draft, even people who get a free pass on Obamacare while the rest of us pay up. But you are a socialist, am I right Zlinqx? Surely you understand the need for all people to be accountable on a base level in order to assure that the system does not collapse on account of slackers. I will admit, scocialism detests me in the modern form, but in an ancient Biblical format, we do see commands from Yahovah to treat strangers with respect and even set aside extra food in our fields for foregners, widows and orphans.

When one person begins to feel like they don't have to contribute. . . soon other people feel the same. After all, why do they have to put into something if other people are not, when they are perfectly able too? It dwindles from there, and this basic lack of care for individuals who are less fortunate. . . I really do believe causes the destruction of a modern society. Some children would gladly never steal if they were raised with plenty as opposed to not enough. And that's why I think a welfare system of sorts is a good safeguard against this kind of chaos, however, those who are capable of contributing should not be given a free pass.

People who are capable of working, but don't look for a job, aren't just given welfare. Why should it be any different for gays who won't have children simply because they would rather have sex with other guys?

I'm not so sure that gay parents are better than no parents. I worry that the lack of a parent in one gender would hurt that child's development. Just look at the challenges kids face who lack a mom or a dad. I won't deny that good people have come from gay parents, but good people have come from all sorts of terrible parents. It's less likely to happen, and it robs the child of something they are somewhat owed. This sounds crazy (don't I always? XD) But I was taking a look at the Torah again, and I have been wondering if orphanages are actually an unbiblical system. At least as a government institute. I mean, if someone wants to take in a child as their own? I don't have a problem with that, but the child must have a say in it too. It seems to me that children were just supposed to live of the welfare system, and find ways to support themselves. I'm beginning to come to the opinion that government orphanages are actually a bad idea.

I am glad you have been fortunate with your mom.

Yeah, I do get angry with people who have kids, but don't take care of them. But no. . . my reasons for saying men and women compliment each other is actually because of. . .what I have seen in many people's lives. I mean, believe it or not, I make observations, and I state things based of those observations from a technical standpoint, as much as it would be based off my own experiences. If you do not have as much faith in me, then you should write me off and discontinue the debate, because I cannot be reasoned with. However, from a scientific standpoint, I think you will agree that there are many things that men and women compliment eachother on. Yes, all men and women are different, but they are simultaneously the same.

Children are not stopped by abortion. They are terminated by it. If two humans having sex doesn't create human offspring, then I don't know what does. I know I've met human beings on a daily basis who are more worthy of termination than they are.


kirbmanboggle :

Yes, yes I did.

And I am more than welcoming of your opinion here, because this is an ongoing study for me. I am pretty hard against homosexuality, but I have been wrong before and I hope I don't stay that way if it is the case. I know that males can be empthatic, and I would even classify myself as one of those males capable of doing so at a higher than average level. However, I am not totally convinced that is something people are just born with. Perhaps I could research specifically what you have just stated more deeply later, but here are my initial problems with such a theory.

For one, I will agree that there are chemical imbalances in the brain, and the human body can be aroused by strange things, but, this is something almost every person experiences. In fact some people have even been aroused by inanimate objects that look nothing like a human. In fact we have a group of people find cars literally sexy today, as well as other people who like animals. . . underage children ect. Your estrogen example may hold weight, but a lot of homosexuals have also come out and said that their lifestyle was a choice, and it couldn't be anything less. I mean no offense kirb, but I know you have not had the best life growing up at all. I don't mean to belittle you, but you did have some problems even with your interaction with people on Vizzed, although other people like me and Singeli did try to help, and I'm glad that we could become friends. What I am saying, is not an uncommon situation, but is it possible your bisexuality is part trauma induced? That's not always the cause, and indeed, every case is different. I hope not to make you upset by suggesting as much, but it's a hard for me to believe that people are just born this way.

I fear that it's just a ruse made to justify something that ought not be justified, and in the end won't make people truly happy. In fact, I know what you mean when you speak about feeling great passion, and a wonderful thing is when love is felt or accomplish. However, I have also seen that feeling be swept away, leaving behind the shadow of an illusion to what I thought was coming. Just because a person has feelings, does not make them justified. In fact, following our heart and desires can be the worst thing that we've ever chosen to do. Even in straight marriages as women let themselves be used, or a husband picks a wife who emotionally abuses and nags him to death. Just because you feel something in the moment does mean happiness overall. We must gaurd ourselves from our own hearts at times sadly.

Society will always hate you if you're different. Not because you're right and they know it. . . and they won't even hate you because you are wrong. They'll just hate you because they aren't used to it and they fear what the long term consequences could be to their order structure. That's why many people hate me, and I keep a lot of my political views to myself when I'm in "dangerous territory."

Yeah, males can be nurturing. It's not the same as a girl, but it can be. . . mimicked or done in a fatherly way. I still would have to say by experience it's different in some ways. Genders can mimic one another temporarily and even do decently at some things, however, the base programming and biological structure is still there, and most times people will revert back to that.


Even if a person is born with such preferences, that doesn't make them a good thing, and that doesn't mean it's unchangeable. Out of curiosity, have you looked at. . . soy and homosexuality?

I have an interesting story for you. I had a piano teacher who owned chickens, and like most chicken owners, when she had compost, she would throw the compost out to their pen and the chickens would eat it up. However one day, she threw something out to her birds that had a large amount testosterone in it. Realizing her mistake too late, she went out to retrieve the material, but it was all gone. Days later her female chickens had grown large spurs, and started crowing like roosters. The worst fact of all was that they quit laying eggs. . . This made them. . . effectively nothing but a money sink to her. She had to kill them, and it was very unfortunate.

It wouldn't surprise me if what you said was somewhat true, in fact, I would go even further to suggest a diet of large amounts of estrogen could have a negative effect on a person's sexuality. But I don't think it's a good thing to have, you know?

Anyways, thanks for stopping by, and being polite as you have been. I whole heartedly appreciate it and hope for the best for you. No- seriously, I wish I had more people talking about this like you have. I mean you not only explained your own story and why you think it is this way, but you were kind and humbler. Attitudes like that will help change the world. ^^


imamonster :

Yeah, I know what you mean. A record of STDs being rampant for over 40 years in a community that is supposedly the most scientifically, sexually, educated group of people in the world. I totally got rekt that day.

"I'd comment on the STD discussion you keep bringing up but Zlinq already rekt you on that so I'm not gonna bother."

Which. . . you did just comment on it. But hey, it sucks losing, so I can't blame you. Could spell your champion's name right rather than making a short little post as fast as you can regarding your thoughts on the issue. He's a nice guy, just saying. The fact that he doesn't have an ego and. . . I dunno, push it on people too much? That makes him actually desirable to talk too. I'm glad I don't let you be the example for most of my more liberal friends out there. That's for sure. :3


sonicthehedgehog57 :

Yeah, that's not far from how I feel on a lot of those issues. People don't have a right to move to another country. We need to think about our own countries future, and besides that. If. . . gays or ANYONE wants to use their "oppressed identity" to get certain rights higher than ours, or manipulate the courts, then we've traded one set of oppressed people for another, and that's what angers me. Why do people become the monsters they want to destroy!?


Txgangsta :

I had always suspected that was the cause. I think that they can be healed though as sexuality is a very mental thing to begin with. I think of how Song of Solomon se

I don't like gays or homosexuals. Not them so much as what they do, in fact I even sympathize with them a little because I would hate to feel like I needed to do something that only got me an evil glare from half the U.S. populace, but at the same time I do that anyways. I've looked across the internet up and down, gathered facts, checked out statistics, and yes, gay people DO suffer tremendously from STDs, and even though these diseases do not STEM from homosexuality, it says a great deal about them as a community when they keep getting them, and they are supposed to be a lot more educated than that and even leading the psychological revolution. But that's not the real issue. The reason I don't like them is actually more along the lines of this.

It's that they have sex without having children. Oh! I know what you're going to say! "What about adoption!?!? Huh? Don't you think they should be able to raise children?"

And for me the answer is "Nope!" And do you know why?

Well, mentally, the first reason is women are automatically more capable in areas that men are not. (They tend to be more perceptive of other's emotions for example, and also more nurturing.) Yes, not all women are the same, and guys and girls DO act a lot more like the other gender than their own at times, but THAT'S OKAY because back at the core they still fall into their original categories, and are great a the jobs they are best equipped to handle. What I don't get is how people can attack the male and female identity without getting in huge trouble for. . . telling guys and girls that they are actually pretty much the same. . . in fact, I think that years of history, culture and (if you believe in it) evolution would go against that. I mean yeah, if men and women were not different, I'm sure at least half the cultures out there would treat it that way, but we consistently see a running theme 9 out of ten times where women are raising children, not as adept for combat, ect. And these really aren't bad things (I. . . hope the people who support women's rights and enlightenment wouldn't tell them that traditional gender roles are not only somehow lies, but also holding them back or actually negative in finding who they should be!) I mean, as an author, I can tell you that writing men and women is lot's different. Same for drawing them too actually. (Shoulder placement. . . breasts. . . average height. . . even head shape.) And voicebox wise they certainly sound different. Anyone want to explain to me why this is a. . . bad thing?

But yeah, I don't EVER see gay parents being as good natural parents as two straight parents are. And yeah, with as crappy as parents have become nowadays? It wouldn't surprise me if you could find really dedicated gay parents WHO WERE BETTER than two bad straight ones. But that still doesn't mean gay parents are automatically better or even that they are the solution. Anyone who has a real mom knows. The same is true if you have a real dad, and yes, we do need to do something about how little parents care about their children nowadays.

For another reason I don't really like or respect gays. . . it's that I see them as kindof selfish.

"What!??! they can't help it! How DARE you suggest such a thing!"

Well I'm sorry! But when your body is. . . designed to work a certain way. . . and you kindof. . . use it the opposite. . . and then the fact that the rest of us will likely have at least one or two kids to push on society and a gay person will have none (and skip the 9 month pregnancy process and breastfeeding, which I would say is important in establishing the bond between mother and child.) It's not only a cop out in the hardest starting part, but the guys don't even have to worry about getting pregnant or anything. True, birch control does exist, ect, but for the most part about half of Americans do have children, to where as the other half do want to have kids some day between the ages of 18 and 40. (only about 6% don't want to have kids at any time in their life, and yes, I don't think of them in the best of light, but I can understand financial hurdles and other reasons that people should consider.)

So like. . . my parents worked hard to raise me. Same for their parents and onward. When you have children you establish a community legacy and your memory lives on in a way that even famous people who are childless cannot do so. It's kindof a pet peeve of mine, or a very legitimate reason to feel slightly angry towards an entire group of people that. . . claims they can't help the way they feel, but also cut out of the HARDEST CONTRIBUTION TO THE FUTURE OF YOUR OWN PEOPLE!

I mean. . wow! Think about that! It's a heavy responsibility, and. . . I'm supposed to not even bat an eye when two men are just going to have sex the rest of their life. . . not make more money to support other mouths ect? No. . . I find it suspicious and just like in war and the draft. . . I do not like to see other people getting off for free. Should the next generation be all of our responsibilities, and shouldn't our children get everything they need? (Parents of two genders?)

The last thing I don't like about homosexuality is. . . I really doubt that they could be truly happy. I call it psychology. Writing and looking into how men and women compliment each other has really made me appreciate it. Yes, some people are different, but we still have the same organs and general makeup. I've never heard anyone try to say that some kids like having sex underage just because they are "different". If you're not in Pakistan you'd probably be pretty horrified by it. How can people in such an unnatural union be healthy and happy. . . psychologically!?!? It just doesn't make sense to me, so that's my thoughts on the topic, now I want to hear yours.

Post away~

Drop the hatchet.

Some people need to learn the hard way in life that they can't depend on others to not only validated their existence, but also give them hope. If he had a two year head start, is that immature, and he depends on you for meaning in life. . . you need to let him go.

It can hurt to lose friends, and honestly, I've had "friends" hate me for the strangest of reasons. I just let bad friends go, and make less of an effort to speak to them. This topic genuinely upsets me because I want the best for everyone, but I know it's not reality.

People have to learn the hard way. Real life is often the best educator. That having been said, I don't think that you need to just completely let him go, but I would limit the time that you are willing to spend with him. If he's taking up your time. . . or ruining your mentality, then cut back the amount of time that you spend with him, and don't let him be clingy. He will eventually get the message and realize his life is a wreck. I know it's hard to give people what they deserve, but nothing is worse than hanging in a twisted limbo that isn't good in the long run for either of you. That's what I recommend. I'll wish you the best of luck.