The question is answered!

Question; Have I played Tony Hawk games before

Answer; Yes, I have.

Who is it? Vote on who you think it could be by the 20th.

Furret :
Zlinqx :
zanderlex :
NovemberJoy :
deg2000 :
Barathemos :
Popeye116 :
ZeroTails :
supernerd117 :
Kuti_Kat :
kirbmanboggle :
Surgiac :
TornadoMudkip :
A user of this :
mvhupsel :
Tyrian Delirium :
geeogree :
Snowdeath :

pacman1755 : just to clarify - the person we pick dies correct...

I just want to make sure I understand. Or is the person we pick revealed to not be the murderer and nothing happens to them. Obviously the murderer gets to kill someone but I'm checking if our vote kills someone as well.

I feel strongly that we shouldn't judge who did it simply by their game profile this early in the game.  If it comes down to it, we can come back and review this question.  But the murderer chose this question for a reason.  If they're a murderer worth their salt, and if there are only a few people with Tony Hawk games in their profile, they probably wouldn't have chosen this question.  It would be an extremely risky move.

And guys...plz don't kill me...

geeogree : Whoever receives the most votes gets lynched aka removed from the game.... Unless the majority is that there is no lynch... 

My Internet is finally fixed, so I can be more active from now on.

Now for the matters at hand I think we shouldn't have a lynch. Judging from these 3 questions I get the feeling we won't be seeing slip ups from the murderer, which (if it's true) would mean it's unlikely we'll be getting very helpful leads from the questions we're allowed to pick. If we can buy time and extend the game duration, we'll probably have a better chance to catch the murderer later on. It'd be best to kill someone only when we actually think the clues we have are good enough.

Of course, there's always the chance that there'll be a random lynch if we choose not to lynch anyone, but in any case I think the sooner we find out about it the better anyways.

VOTE: No Kill

Okay, good to know. I thought that was how it worked. I'm going to go with mvhupsel in this first round. I can't see any reason to assume based on someones profile that having (or not having) a Tony Hawk game is proof of anything.

Vote: No Kill.

Yeah as i stated when mentioning the question choice, it was one of the challenges for Vizzed Survivor.. so a lof of members should have that in their library.... 

Whether or not that means anything shall remain to be seen.... but it seems strange to mention a tony hawks game as they've not precisely been good for a while.... 

Vote: No Kill

Random Fos'es

Bara: Posted once... when posted just basically voting for a question already in the majority. I see bara as someone that usually would have posted more than this by now
zander: Same as above.. especially considering it's a tdv month
mvhupsel : Because you was my first hunch with these three questions...

Now i'm well aware that chances are it's not these three... and i don't want this to randomly make people accuse them... but... everyone should be looking out for uncharacteristic actions... because honestly the best way in my opinion to play the murderer is to simply act like yourself 

i swear i've been getting these far more often that usual...

Baka double posts.

I might be jumping on the bandwagon but I did want to wait for most posts to give me like more evidence or something but it seems we're all kind of going in the same direction. And that previously stated that this question isn't a good source for us to blindly call out someone. I don't exactly find some people suspicious but I also don't want to FoS just because I feel suspicious of them.

VOTE: NO KILL

For now anyway if someone gives me a good reason or I do find something strange someone said I might change this later.

I agree that it's too early to send someone to their doom, especially with little evidence.  Their response is hardly conclusive evidence.  Therefore, my vote is for

VOTE: NO KILL

Like I said, those questions aren't that good, so I'll join the bandwagon and say...

Vote: no kill

The only people I know of who play the games aren't even playing this so.

VOTE: NO KILL

A n00b question: if we decide not to kill anyone, does that mean the murderer kills two users instead of one? Or is something else going to happen?

I agree with everyone. We simply don't know enough about the murderer right now. My vote is also ''No Kill''.

I'm voting NO KILL as well.
This answer doesn't put suspicion on anyone besides the few who played it on Survivor (and even then it's a vague lead at best).

Hopefully the next question will give us some better info, though it seems like the murderer knows what they're doing.

*hops on bandwagon*
Vote: No kill

Also, I have a question. Will somebody be murdered, and question options given, on the same update? Or will those be two separate occasions?

Popeye116 : I guess it really depends on two things

1) If pacman feels two posts is easier for people not to miss anything and gives the murderer time to actually think of decent questions
2) the murderer already has 3 solid questions to ask. 

No kill I guess we dont wanna kill any innocent people right iff the bat.

It's too early to decide anything if you ask me. I think the best thing to do would be to wait for a better question to come around.

Vote: No Kill

It's too early to lynch anyone. We'd more than likely lose 2 people, one to the vote, & one to the killer & there's not enough evidence I think. 


Vote: No Kill

Wow, looks like we're going NO VOTE for the night! The survivors decide not to kill anyone at this time. However, this will not prevent the murderer from taking the next turn to kill one of you. So when the next update comes when the murderer decides who they want to kill, one of you will be dead, and 3 more questions will be asked.


Furret :
Zlinqx :
zanderlex :
NovemberJoy :
deg2000 :
Barathemos :
Popeye116 :
ZeroTails :
supernerd117 :
Kuti_Kat :
kirbmanboggle :
Surgiac :
TornadoMudkip :
A user of this :
mvhupsel :
Tyrian Delirium :
geeogree :
Snowdeath :