Overall 8.6 Graphics 8 Sound 8.2 Addictive 4.7 Story 6.2 Depth 5.5 Difficulty 5.3
3.8
I don't know what I expected SQman
How would I call this hack? Unbalanced, unfinished, unoriginal, un... Ok, let's start this.
First
of all, I don't think it's actually finished. I mean, nothing is
changed but the first two routes and gym leaders. I don't see any note
about this game being a beta version so I assume the hacker just got
lazy and left it like this. Second thing, this game is glitchy as hell!
Wally encountered a ralts but because it's a starter it was overpowered
and knocked zigzagoon out. Wally sent bad egg and things got weird. What
was the author thinking? They knew Wally would be fighting ralts and
they failed to foresee what could happen? What's this thing with
ridiculously powerful starters anyway? [sarcasm] It's not like games are
supposed to be challenging! Oh, wait! It's balanced, because you can't
win your first battle with poochyena if you choose ralts![/sarcasm]. If
they could give ralts sacred fire, then why not pound?
Have I
mentioned that only the first three routes and towns are changed? They
actually look pretty well, but most of the players want to play for
longer than 5 minutes.
Let's go back to balance for a while, ok? What
pokemon do you expect to meet on the first two routes? Rattata? Starly?
Are you insane? Tauros, miltank and kangaskhan are the only reasonable
answers! 'Course you can meet the basic ones, but they aren't any less
common than these mentioned before. Oh, and the Petalburg woods also
have changed pokemon, even though it looks exactly the same as in normal
games, but the route before is completely untouched. Why would
you catch a ziggy or lotad when you can have kangaskhans, politoeds and
scyther already (not to mention that your starter is broken)?
I could as well...
Graphics - 7
I must admit that the new grass looks nice, although I'm sure I've seen it in some well known, much better but still bad hack. I don't think anything else is changed.
Sound - 5
Nothing changed
Addictiveness - 3
Most of us expected something new, not an exact copy of pokemon ruby, but with OP spheal that makes it even easier.
Story - 2
Universal type stuff... I don't like this idea, but what is much worse, there was nothing about it in game. Beating up Team Magma again *sigh*
Depth - 2
I could rate it 8, but I'm not gonna rate Pokemon Ruby. I think I'm more generous than I should for nothing.
Difficulty - 4
Ralts starts with psychic, rock head aron learns volt tackle, middle- to end-game pokemon at the very start. It's only hard if you nuzlocke it blind. If you know about hax leaders, you can plow through the game with your earthquaking aron.
Overall - 3,8
It's not Cheetahmen, but it's not worth playing.
Graphics 7 Sound 5 Addictive 3 Story 2 Depth 2 Difficulty 4
Review Rating: 4/5
Submitted: 06-27-13
Review Replies: 0
8
same old poke ruby derrick
well hey thought this game was going to be a blast..custom starters =D and from reading the description a whole lot of things coming along deeper in the game =D. NOPE!!! >:o...the person that made this basically copy almost everything from ruby like 98.9% of the stuff..you can't catch all of the pokes =/, no islands he/she was talking about..stupidly changed potion and poke ball name. Only thing that was change like i had said was starters, some gym and elite pokes and that was it. Wanted to give it a lower rating but since it's almost a absolute copy of ruby i had to give it a 8. Don't play if u played ruby already!!!!!!
Sound 8 Addictive 4 Story 4 Depth 3 Difficulty 3
Review Rating: 3.6/5
Submitted: 07-11-11
Review Replies: 0
1
Big fail to this person Lightning Fang07
I'm sorry to the person who made this but it is an epic fail! There wasn't enough changes made to the code I mean Natu used peck! It's super effective to Ralts?! WHAT THE HECK! That means the starters don't match the actual Pokémon type and I can't even beat May, Heck can't even beat the first Pokémon you battle. Sure give Ralts Pyshic instead of something reasonable like starting with Secret or Hidden power because the thought of a fair attack to use on a dark type makes no sense at all... Now ranting aside (Or so) time to get a bit more in depth with my review.
Overall is a 1
Because overall I CAN'T PLAY THE GAME! I want to play with a Ralts as my starter but give it all the weakness of Grass types makes everything go south faster then any bird in migration.
Graphics get a fair 8
They match up to the game the hack is made from and admitably the grass looks cool but some trees can be walked through while some grass can't even be touched by the player sprite.
Sound gets a fair 8
I will say the sound is great but I heard a strange beep at times... Maybe it's just my laptop though.
Addictiveness 1
I was thinking I'm going to love this game I can have a Ralts to start the game but then... FAIL! All the fails I kept getting and my wallet the Poke I have going down to Zip faster then I could heat up a Hot Pocket.
Story - 0
Because I can't even beat May in the first match and my Ralts owned by a level 2 Natu using Peck.
Depth 1
Do to the point I can reach is barely the start.
Difficulty 10
Needs to be worked on and improved.
Suggestions, Remake this game and fix chunks of the coding.
Graphics 8 Sound 8 Addictive 1 Depth 1 Difficulty 10
Review Rating: 3.5/5
Submitted: 07-29-13
Review Replies: 3
9
very glitchy whilst very good xphoenix
This game is a hack of either Pokémon ruby or emerald I believe, the maps have all been completely remade and the story kind of follows the same one that emerald follows.so why don't I like the game well the glitches if you have seen my screen shots you will see things like walking into trees and becoming invisible or bad egg in the how to catch a Pokémon tutorial.any how moving away from the bad side you do get to pick ralts as a starter which learns PSYCHIC very early on if you like glitches or just plainly don't mind them then this is the game for you, the sound follows the original and so does the textures sadly theirs no new Pokémon which I would have loved to see from this game.Again though if you play it beware and enjoy!
Graphics 8 Sound 8 Addictive 6 Story 6 Depth 9 Difficulty 5
Review Rating: 3/5
Submitted: 05-10-13
Review Replies: 1
5.1
Not what I expected Nyan_Wolf
Well, I expected an EPIC GAME! But all I got was a Pokémon game with different starters and a changed map until you get to your Dad's gym..... Then every thing's the same. I really don't recommend this and the only reason it got 7 in graphics was that it was Ruby's and the first edited part of the map was still glitch! Since I've played this game so much, I can't really say it was addicting.... At all.... I recommend not wasting VIZ on this.... Unless you haven't played Pokémon Ruby, or just want to change up your starter Pokémon, don't play this game....
Graphics 7 Sound 10 Addictive 4 Story 9 Depth 8 Difficulty 4
Review Rating: 2.7/5
Submitted: 04-10-13
Updated: 04-10-13
Review Replies: 4